EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
The Census Bureau has not yet reported how many were on welfare in 2013 or the first two quarters of 2014.
But the 109,631,000 living in households taking federal welfare benefits as of the end of 2012, according to the Census Bureau, equaled 35.4 percent of all 309,467,000 people living in the United States at that time.
The 35.4 Percent 109 631 000 on Welfare CNS News
I told you that some ultra partisan sources claim percentages like that, but that they do it by counting things like social security, not real welfare. So then you post a link to an ultra partisan source giving those numbers that explicitly admits that it is counting social security and whatnot... So I guess you're just confirming what I said?
dear, Barry just put 13 million people on Medicaid giving another 13 million people more incentive than ever not to work and contribute to society. Deadly, crippling, family destroying, liberal progams are Barry's stock in trade even though when he took office govt was far bigger than ever!! Read "never enough" if you think there is any logical end to liberalism short of communism. Are you a fellow traveler, comrade?
Norman Thomas quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]
C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium
Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”
"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin