Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
in other words, all you really have, is walls of text.That's not ad homemin. Cultural Marxists are filthy. There is nothing good about them.nothing but the fallacy of ad hominem? how critical is that.Not the way that filthy cultural Marxists practice it.no, they are not. critique of self and government, is worth while.You don't know what you are talking about. Critical theory and critical thinking are the antithesis of of each other.critical, is the operative term. and, i am suggesting improvements to our Republic.
It's a little more complicated than that.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
I have the most detailed examination of socialism ever undertake. I have quite a lot. What do you have?in other words, all you really have, is walls of text.That's not ad homemin. Cultural Marxists are filthy. There is nothing good about them.nothing but the fallacy of ad hominem? how critical is that.Not the way that filthy cultural Marxists practice it.no, they are not. critique of self and government, is worth while.You don't know what you are talking about. Critical theory and critical thinking are the antithesis of of each other.
I don't believe that social security will lead us to socialism. I believe materialism will lead us to socialism. I believe that socialism is like a narcotic; it is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. FDR said something similar.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
no. Only your, convoluted logic is that complicated; par for the course, from the national socialist right wing.It's a little more complicated than that.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Socialism worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
Solzhenitsyn stated it thusly, "Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity."
all you have is a fallacy of false Cause through a fallacy of composition. Our form of Socialism, is limited to the express Terms found in our social Contract.I have the most detailed examination of socialism ever undertake. I have quite a lot. What do you have?in other words, all you really have, is walls of text.That's not ad homemin. Cultural Marxists are filthy. There is nothing good about them.nothing but the fallacy of ad hominem? how critical is that.Not the way that filthy cultural Marxists practice it.no, they are not. critique of self and government, is worth while.
The Socialist Phenomenon by Igor Shafarevich
We had outright communism during WWII; it was for propaganda purposes, a "joke". Only the national socialist right wing, takes it seriously in modern times.I don't believe that social security will lead us to socialism. I believe materialism will lead us to socialism. I believe that socialism is like a narcotic; it is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. FDR said something similar.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Bull fucking shit. Liberal socialist protect their wealthy friends and screw the poor.no. Only your, convoluted logic is that complicated; par for the course, from the national socialist right wing.It's a little more complicated than that.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Socialism worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
Solzhenitsyn stated it thusly, "Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity."
the liberal socialist left wing knows, socialism starts with a social contract.
That's funny because it is you who has constructed a meaningless fallacy of composition which explains and justifies nothing. Your form of socialism cannot be trusted because you cannot be trusted because socialists cannot be trusted. Socialism intentionally denies examination. Cultural Marxists seek to subordinate family, religion, God and country. They even have a set formula for doing so. In fact, it is what you are doing by defending socialism. The funny thing is that you don't really come out and expound on the virtues of socialism. That too is explainable, you are practicing the ideological subversion of critical theory where you criticize what you don't believe to justify what you do believe without out ever critically examining what you do believe. Which is BTW what critical thinking is. Critical thinking is the critical challenge of what you do believe to test the validity of what you believe.all you have is a fallacy of false Cause through a fallacy of composition. Our form of Socialism, is limited to the express Terms found in our social Contract.I have the most detailed examination of socialism ever undertake. I have quite a lot. What do you have?in other words, all you really have, is walls of text.That's not ad homemin. Cultural Marxists are filthy. There is nothing good about them.nothing but the fallacy of ad hominem? how critical is that.Not the way that filthy cultural Marxists practice it.
The Socialist Phenomenon by Igor Shafarevich
Bull fucking shit. We just had a fucking socialist almost win the Democratic presidential nomination. And he would have won it too if not for the DNC which conspired against him which is what was in all of those fucking emails. So your "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" argument is bull fucking shit. What's next, Ivan?We had outright communism during WWII; it was for propaganda purposes, a "joke". Only the national socialist right wing, takes it seriously in modern times.I don't believe that social security will lead us to socialism. I believe materialism will lead us to socialism. I believe that socialism is like a narcotic; it is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. FDR said something similar.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
That's a strong yes.Is it possible to love socialism and be a business owner?
And yet, here you are claiming that a fictional movie has shown you the light.Not afraid, just never interested in fulfilling myself through fiction. I prefer to live in a non-fiction reality and focus my energy on that instead. But to each his own, I suppose.
I think what you don't want to admit is that capitalism is not a perfect economic system. The inherent inequities in the capitalist system is what keeps Socialism alive.
Mistakenly attributed NASA spinoffsThe following is a list of technologies sometimes mistakenly attributed directly to NASA. In many cases, NASA popularized technology or aided its development, which ultimately resulted in the technology's creation.
If you will go back and re-read what I posted, this is exactly what I argued. Trying to change my argument into something you can defeat is an intellectually dishonest game. I never claimed NASA invented or developed these things, I merely pointed out their development (and/or improvement) was largely the result of knowledge and technology gained through the space program. You simply CONFIRMED my argument... Thank you!
you are the dishonest one, you said I simply would not have the microchip and that is patently false
One form of socialism is called Christian socialism.Bull fucking shit. We just had a fucking socialist almost win the Democratic presidential nomination. And he would have won it too if not for the DNC which conspired against him which is what was in all of those fucking emails. So your "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" argument is bull fucking shit. What's next, Ivan?We had outright communism during WWII; it was for propaganda purposes, a "joke". Only the national socialist right wing, takes it seriously in modern times.I don't believe that social security will lead us to socialism. I believe materialism will lead us to socialism. I believe that socialism is like a narcotic; it is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. FDR said something similar.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Sure. The Gnostics are a good example of that, and others too.One form of socialism is called Christian socialism.Bull fucking shit. We just had a fucking socialist almost win the Democratic presidential nomination. And he would have won it too if not for the DNC which conspired against him which is what was in all of those fucking emails. So your "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" argument is bull fucking shit. What's next, Ivan?We had outright communism during WWII; it was for propaganda purposes, a "joke". Only the national socialist right wing, takes it seriously in modern times.I don't believe that social security will lead us to socialism. I believe materialism will lead us to socialism. I believe that socialism is like a narcotic; it is a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. FDR said something similar.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Who won the Moon Race; the socialism of Government or capitalists with private property?
like right wing socialists don't?Bull fucking shit. Liberal socialist protect their wealthy friends and screw the poor.no. Only your, convoluted logic is that complicated; par for the course, from the national socialist right wing.It's a little more complicated than that.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Socialism worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
Solzhenitsyn stated it thusly, "Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity."
the liberal socialist left wing knows, socialism starts with a social contract.
Right wing socialists? I never wanted the bailouts. I would have let them fail and sent the people to jail that deserved to go to jail. That way everyone could learn a lesson together. Good Lord, you have just admitted to socialism owning the bailouts. Yes, that is the stupid shit that socialism does. Socialist protect their wealthy friends and screw the poor.
There are no right wing socialists, amigo. There are only left wing socialists. Why else do you think they paid Hillary more than a nurse makes in 10 years for giving a 20 minute speech?like right wing socialists don't?Bull fucking shit. Liberal socialist protect their wealthy friends and screw the poor.no. Only your, convoluted logic is that complicated; par for the course, from the national socialist right wing.It's a little more complicated than that.Since there must be fifty types of socialism it's good that posters do not have to name the type of socialism they are referring to in their posts. In the Thirties when FDR pushed Social Security it was named Marxian by Republicans and we were on our way to communism. Do any Republicans still hold to that premise that Social Security will lead America to communism?
Socialism worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
Solzhenitsyn stated it thusly, "Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity."
the liberal socialist left wing knows, socialism starts with a social contract.
Right wing socialists? I never wanted the bailouts. I would have let them fail and sent the people to jail that deserved to go to jail. That way everyone could learn a lesson together. Good Lord, you have just admitted to socialism owning the bailouts. Yes, that is the stupid shit that socialism does. Socialist protect their wealthy friends and screw the poor.
Nice try, but that Only works in elementary school. Government is socialism. SpaceX needs to go to the Moon and make a profit.Who won the Moon Race; the socialism of Government or capitalists with private property?
Well, since the USSR was the Socialist system and the USA was the free market Capitalist system, I will go with the Capitalist system. You can keep up this falsehood that all governments are socialist but that argument has already been debunked and I won't continue to point it out. All government is not socialist. Sorry.
