drsmith1072
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 6,031
- 250
You have no class, cracker?
do your DD
I hate to use this link, it has so much information
but you leave me no choice
read it or shut up
Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror - by Deroy Murdock
It was irrelevant the first two times that you spammed it as a response and it does nothing to address the actual content of my post.
Furthermore you do realize that you further prove what a parrot you are as you continue to only cut, paste and spam other peoples opinions as a response to anything and everything even though they have NOTHING to do with what was actually said, don't you?
NOW, how about you go back to my post and answer the questions posed to you based on your spin and stop spamming the board with your irrelevant nonresponsive parroting?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3580982-post559.html
question?
what question
That would be QUESTIONS that you failed to answer and now pretend don't exist. SO are you really this ignorant or are you just playing that way so you can try to justify avoiding questions of your arguments.
We did when GWB was president
we did what?? What are you claiming and care to prove it??
and
I just wonder why you choose to cherry pick a time in the past even as you ignore facts from a more recent time that tend to counter your spin and have MORE to do with the current conversationTo start with I am 100% against all violence
These events went on from 1991 till 2003
Hell Saddam had kicked out the inspectors in 1998, oh I know here comes they choose to leave them selves argument
and
Thats 1998, not 2003
re write history?
What does 1998 have to do with W's CHOICE to kick out the inspectors BEFORE they had completed their jobseven as W chose to invade in 2003? Furthermore, wasn't their job in accordance with the UN and wasn't W's decision at least partially based on the claim that iraq violated a UN resolution??
How can you honestly use the violation of UN resolutions as a justification when W went against the UN to invade???
and
AGAIN since you are prone to ignoring facts that counter your spin i guess I will have to repeat them to you. If you want to look at a root cause look to reagan who helped saddam in the iran-iraq war inspite of his use of WMDs. Do you actually believe saddam's reign began in 1991?If Saddam does the right thing in 1991, why the hell is there even a history?
This is why a liberal fails so many times in a free market environment
They do not understand a root cause analysis
and
Iraq is an event that had a 63% in favor of invading in 2003
Nearly two-thirds of respondents, 63 percent, favor sending ground troops to remove Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein from power
Poll: Bush gaining support on invading Iraq - CNN
Uh and you don't think that has anything to do with how W and the right talked up the imminent threat that iraq posed to the US and how if we don't intercede we could see mushroom clouds over our cities??
those are SOME of the questions that you avoided. Care to take answer them??
and let me add
spam?
yes you added spam. I hope that answers your question.
Your ignoring it makes it allot more than spam
Not ignoring it just calling it what it is, and it is Biased rigthwing opinion based propaganda. Any reader with any common sense would tell you that the guy is presenting his OPINIONS laced with out of context quotes and baseless assumptions.
Here is an example. The author goes into a rant about iraq and alqaeda and yet he presents a chart that shows iraq support of different terrorist groups but al qaeda is NOT in the chart. So why present that in an argument trying to link alqaeda to saddam when it does not show a link?? It's obvious that the auther is trying to claim that saddam is linked to al qaeda because saddam provided support to other terrorists in the past.
In other words the author of your link is being dishonest.
look you liberals kept claiming Saddam was everything but a bad person
I provide information to prove otherwise and you want to change the subject
not a chance
Please explain the words that you are trying to put in my mouth. What are you trying to claim that I said about saddam?? Please provide something of substance to support your claims. Furthermore, how is asking YOU to provide a real source and not some rightwing propaganda changing the subject??
Do you just make shite up as you go along??
Now let's see if you will actually answer the questions and address the actual content of my post or will you just spam some more nonresponsive bs??
Last edited: