Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?

[BlindBoo]

my friend you are without doubt lost
If you think for one minute that this country is going to defend its borders only when the UN says we can you are badly mistaken
No where in our constitution will you find "and if the UN approves"

Look I hate to say this, but are you nuts?
The UN has nothing to do with how this country will ever defend it self

Iraq was not at our borders threatening an invasion, and they were not a significant threat to the worlds remaining super power. Nor were they involved with the 9-11 attacks, both are pre-requisites for authorization for military force in the act passed by congress. Granted either one was good enough but neither one was satisfied.

NO THAT WAS NOT NOR DID HAVE ANY THING TO DO WITH A PRE INVASION
DO YOUR DD DAMN IT

DD? Did you ever read the resolution that passed? Here's the meat.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq ; and
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq .


(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq ; and
acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.


The US had agreed to 1441, which was being enforced and proving Iraq was no significant threat. Iraq was not involved in 9-11.

 

[BlindBoo]

NOTHING HAS BEEN DE BUNKED
HOW DO YOU DE BUNK A VOTE IN THE SENATE?
HOW DO YOU DE-BUNK A SPEECH MADE IN JAN OF 2003 BY HANS BLIX?
HOW DO YOU DE-BUNK THE 500 MUNITIONS FOUND THAT MET THE DEFICITION OF WMD?
HOW DO YOU DE-BUNK THE YELLOW CAKE FOUND AFTER THE INVASION?

HERE TRY
Evidence of WMDs presence in Iraq. - a knol by Luis T. Puig
DOD: Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria « Sister Toldjah
UN weapons inspectors criticise Iraq - 27 January 2003 - New Scientist
Senate approves Iraq war resolution - CNN
YOU DEBUNK ANY OF THAT? THERE IT IS FOR YOU
SENATE VOTES
BLIX STATES IRAQ IS NOT COOPERATING AND HAS 1000S OF WMDS MISSING
WE INVADE 8 WEEKS LATER
DOD TELLS US SENATE, THEY LIED,, WE FOUND THEM, THEY ARE WMDS
WE FIND 550 METRIC TONS OF YELLOW CAKE
DEBUNK IT BUD OR SHUT UP
I AM TIRED OF YOUR LYING

All of this and more has been clearly and soundly debunked, just reread some of the posts you've overlooked.

You will find your answers if you look at instead of ignore the facts.

Here's an idea, why don't you try to address some of those points instead of repeating your debunked points?

So yoUr STATING FOR THE RECORD THAT YOU Nic_Driver;4101248 HAS DE-BUNKED THOSE THREADS ABOVE?
THAT THE SENATE NEVER VOTED TO GIVE THE ADMIN PERMISSION TO ATTACK IF IRAQ FAILED TO MEET THE UN MANDATES SUCH AS 1442?
THAT VOTE NEVER TOOK PLACE? THEN PROVIDE A LINK TO PROVE IT

AND THAT BLIX NEVER MADE THESE STATEMENTS?
Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix remarked in January 2003 that "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance—not even today—of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."[117] Among other things he noted that 1,000 short tons (910 t) of chemical agent were unaccounted for, information on Iraq's VX nerve agent program was missing, and that "no convincing evidence" was presented for the destruction of 8,500 litres (1,900 imp gal; 2,200 US gal) of anthrax that had been declared.[117]
Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

THE THE DOD NEVER WENT BEFORE CONGRESS WITH THIS?
he 500 munitions discovered throughout Iraq since 2003 and discussed in a National Ground Intelligence Center report meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction, the center's commander said here today.
"These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee
DOD: Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria « Sister Toldjah
Defense.gov News Article: Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
I AM NOT GOING TO ADD THE YELLOW CAKE THAT WAS FOUND ALSO
NOW FOR THE RECORD YOUR STATING THAT EACH OF THESE EVENTS ARE FALSE, THE PEOPLE ARE LYING, THE LINKS ARE LIES AND YOU HAVE PROOF TO PROVE THAT Nic_Driver;4101248

There never was a SCR 1442. There was a 1441 but it was not Iraq that did not abide by it, it was the USA that disregarded it and launched an illegal aggressive war.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

We shouldn't have intervened in Iraq or Libya. That's the reality. The Left and Neocons are just playing games and arguing over petty semantics. They actually agree on so much. So it is funny watching them pretend they disagree with each other. Our current President should have gone to our Congress for approval of the Libyan War though. I firmly stand behind my feelings on that. It's time for a truly humble Foreign Policy. No more awful Foreign Interventions. Time to fix our own broken Nation.

 

[Kevinthedog]

We shouldn't have intervened in Iraq or Libya. That's the reality. The Left and Neocons are just playing games and arguing over petty semantics. They actually agree on so much. So it is funny watching them pretend they disagree with each other. Our current President should have gone to our Congress for approval of the Libyan War though. I firmly stand behind my feelings on that. It's time for a truly humble Foreign Policy. No more awful Foreign Interventions. Time to fix our own broken Nation.

Neocons are tea partiers are republicans. same players, same voters. They dont fool me.

I am an isolationist. The middle east is crazy. We should NOT be involved with them, much less have our forces over there.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

We shouldn't have intervened in Iraq or Libya. That's the reality. The Left and Neocons are just playing games and arguing over petty semantics. They actually agree on so much. So it is funny watching them pretend they disagree with each other. Our current President should have gone to our Congress for approval of the Libyan War though. I firmly stand behind my feelings on that. It's time for a truly humble Foreign Policy. No more awful Foreign Interventions. Time to fix our own broken Nation.

Neocons are tea partiers are republicans. same players, same voters. They dont fool me.

I am an isolationist. The middle east is crazy. We should NOT be involved with them, much less have our forces over there.

There is very little difference between a Socialist/Progressive and a Neocon. They're both Big Government Nanny Staters in the end. And they both love all these Foreign Interventions. They like to pretend they disagree so much but they really do agree on most issues. So who will be bombing & killing next? Stay tuned.

 

[JRK]

JRK, just read the information in this link and post on its content please.

snopes.com: Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq

I'm still waiting JRK.

Still waiting...

No your not, nor have you been

Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn’t fit the media’s neat story line that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It’s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian company for further processing into nuclear fuel—thus keeping it from potential use by terrorists or unsavory regimes in the region. This has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as the AP reported, this marks a ‘significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.’ Seems to us this should be big news. After all, much of the early opposition to the war in Iraq involved claims that President Bush ‘lied’ about weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam posed little if any nuclear threat to the U.S. This more or less proves Saddam in 2003 had a program on hold for building WMD and that he planned to boot it up again soon…Saddam acquired most of his uranium before 1991, but still had it in 2003, when invading U.S. troops found the stuff… That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush’s decision to invade.” —Investor’s Business Daily
No WMD in Iraq Huh? | Pundit Review

 

[JRK]

Iraq was not at our borders threatening an invasion, and they were not a significant threat to the worlds remaining super power. Nor were they involved with the 9-11 attacks, both are pre-requisites for authorization for military force in the act passed by congress. Granted either one was good enough but neither one was satisfied.

NO THAT WAS NOT NOR DID HAVE ANY THING TO DO WITH A PRE INVASION
DO YOUR DD DAMN IT

DD? Did you ever read the resolution that passed? Here's the meat.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq ; and
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq .


(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq ; and
acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.


The US had agreed to 1441, which was being enforced and proving Iraq was no significant threat. Iraq was not involved in 9-11.

If you think that the Un has any bearing on this your nuts
simple, nuts
The UN will never dictate who and how we protect our selves

when congress gave him the green flag in 02 and we found WMDs and yellow cake after we invaded it all became null and void
TO the fact any resolution signed with the UN had to be no good, it was all based on lies, from the UN
There the ones who claimed there was no yellow cake in Iraq, No WMDS
are you nuts?
why the desperation?
LET I9T GO
GWB WAS RIGHT
WE WON

 

[JRK]

people CAN ANY OF YOU PRODUCE A DOCUMENT FROM OUR CONSTITUTION THAT STATES THE UN HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE US SENATE OR THE PRESIDENT?

LET ME ADD
ANY AND ALL RESOLUTIONS WITH THE UN AS IT PERTAINS TO IRAQ CANNOT EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUS AS IT WAS SIGNED ON FALSE AND IN- ACCURATE INFORAMTION
jAN 2003 THE UN CLAIMED THAT IRAQ HAD NO "YELLOW CAKE"
Current stockpile None; programme was infiltrated, abandoned, destroyed by Israel and Iran in 1989. Officially program ended in 1990.
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
YET WE4 KNOW NOW THAT SADDAM HAD 550 TONS STOCKPILED
IN FATC IF ANY-ONE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR LYING IT SHOULD BE THE UN.

IN ADDITION THERE WERE OVER 500 MUNITIONS FOUND THAT WERE SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN DECLARED AND DESTROYED YEARS AGO

 

[JakeStarkey]

We shouldn't have intervened in Iraq or Libya. That's the reality. The Left and Neocons are just playing games and arguing over petty semantics. They actually agree on so much. So it is funny watching them pretend they disagree with each other. Our current President should have gone to our Congress for approval of the Libyan War though. I firmly stand behind my feelings on that. It's time for a truly humble Foreign Policy. No more awful Foreign Interventions. Time to fix our own broken Nation.

Neocons are tea partiers are republicans. same players, same voters. They dont fool me.

I am an isolationist. The middle east is crazy. We should NOT be involved with them, much less have our forces over there.

There is very little difference between a Socialist/Progressive and a Neocon. They're both Big Government Nanny Staters in the end. And they both love all these Foreign Interventions. They like to pretend they disagree so much but they really do agree on most issues. So who will be bombing & killing next? Stay tuned.

The progressives come in Big Government Left Wing and Big Government Right Wing, whether Clinton or the Bushes or Obama. American progressives are not commies or socialists, and the Hard Right is not conservative only reactionary.

Come on, guys, you have to get your terms and definitions right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

people CAN ANY OF YOU PRODUCE A DOCUMENT FROM OUR CONSTITUTION THAT STATES THE UN HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE US SENATE OR THE PRESIDENT?

LET ME ADD
ANY AND ALL RESOLUTIONS WITH THE UN AS IT PERTAINS TO IRAQ CANNOT EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUS AS IT WAS SIGNED ON FALSE AND IN- ACCURATE INFORAMTION
jAN 2003 THE UN CLAIMED THAT IRAQ HAD NO "YELLOW CAKE"
Current stockpile None; programme was infiltrated, abandoned, destroyed by Israel and Iran in 1989. Officially program ended in 1990.
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
YET WE4 KNOW NOW THAT SADDAM HAD 550 TONS STOCKPILED
IN FATC IF ANY-ONE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR LYING IT SHOULD BE THE UN.

IN ADDITION THERE WERE OVER 500 MUNITIONS FOUND THAT WERE SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN DECLARED AND DESTROYED YEARS AGO

JRK, the modern nations have signed international agreements about war crimes. Bush's regime tried to renege on some of them, but that does not not make a war crime something else.

We were in violation of international law. Our leaders can be tried as war criminals. Those who defend them can be tried as members of an illegal war-crimes organization.

 

[BlindBoo]

NO THAT WAS NOT NOR DID HAVE ANY THING TO DO WITH A PRE INVASION
DO YOUR DD DAMN IT

DD? Did you ever read the resolution that passed? Here's the meat.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq ; and
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq .


(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq ; and
acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.


The US had agreed to 1441, which was being enforced and proving Iraq was no significant threat. Iraq was not involved in 9-11.

If you think that the Un has any bearing on this your nuts
simple, nuts
The UN will never dictate who and how we protect our selves

when congress gave him the green flag in 02 and we found WMDs and yellow cake after we invaded it all became null and void
TO the fact any resolution signed with the UN had to be no good, it was all based on lies, from the UN
There the ones who claimed there was no yellow cake in Iraq, No WMDS
are you nuts?
why the desperation?
LET I9T GO
GWB WAS RIGHT
WE WON

The joint resolution passed by congress did in fact mention the UN. and it's resolutions.

snopes.com: Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq

Again no one claimed Iraq had no Yellow cake. The site and it's content were accounted for by the wepons inspectors. It did not represent anything new.

 

[Nic_Driver]

JRK, just read the information in this link and post on its content please.

snopes.com: Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq

I'm still waiting JRK.

Still waiting...

No your not, nor have you been

Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn’t fit the media’s neat story line that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It’s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian company for further processing into nuclear fuel—thus keeping it from potential use by terrorists or unsavory regimes in the region. This has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as the AP reported, this marks a ‘significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.’ Seems to us this should be big news. After all, much of the early opposition to the war in Iraq involved claims that President Bush ‘lied’ about weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam posed little if any nuclear threat to the U.S. This more or less proves Saddam in 2003 had a program on hold for building WMD and that he planned to boot it up again soon…Saddam acquired most of his uranium before 1991, but still had it in 2003, when invading U.S. troops found the stuff… That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush’s decision to invade.” —Investor’s Business Daily
No WMD in Iraq Huh? | Pundit Review

Yes, and I'm still waiting.

The yellow cake was identified, labeled and stored back in 1991 and was legally in Iraq when Bush invaded.

You seem to keep skipping over this important detail.



Is that because you are being dishonest or is it because you simply don't understand?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Gaddafi "Evil". Had to go. Hussein "Evil". Had to go. Socialists/Progressives and Neocons really are just arguing over petty semantics. They both love aggressive Foreign Interventionism. Now they're both just stuck in "Defending their guy" Mode. Neither Iraq or Libya should have happened. So what are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons really arguing about? They both love bombing & killing around the World. They're both wrong.

 

[Nic_Driver]

Gaddafi "Evil". Had to go. Hussein "Evil". Had to go. Socialists/Progressives and Neocons really are just arguing over petty semantics. They both love aggressive Foreign Interventionism. Now they're both just stuck in "Defending their guy" Mode. Neither Iraq or Libya should have happened. So what are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons really arguing about? They both love bombing & killing around the World. They're both wrong.

‘Support of a popular rebellion’ and ‘invasion to overthrow’ are two completely different things.

Stop trying to compare them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gaddafi "Evil". Had to go. Hussein "Evil". Had to go. Socialists/Progressives and Neocons really are just arguing over petty semantics. They both love aggressive Foreign Interventionism. Now they're both just stuck in "Defending their guy" Mode. Neither Iraq or Libya should have happened. So what are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons really arguing about? They both love bombing & killing around the World. They're both wrong.

‘Support of a popular rebellion’ and ‘invasion to overthrow’ are two completely different things.

Stop trying to compare them.

LibocalypseNow understands the difference, just won't admit it.

 

[Contumacious]

NO THAT WAS NOT NOR DID HAVE ANY THING TO DO WITH A PRE INVASION
DO YOUR DD DAMN IT

DD? Did you ever read the resolution that passed? Here's the meat.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq ; and
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq .


(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq ; and
acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.


The US had agreed to 1441, which was being enforced and proving Iraq was no significant threat. Iraq was not involved in 9-11.

If you think that the Un has any bearing on this your nuts
simple, nuts
The UN will never dictate who and how we protect our selves

when congress gave him the green flag in 02 and we found WMDs and yellow cake after we invaded it all became null and void
TO the fact any resolution signed with the UN had to be no good, it was all based on lies, from the UN
There the ones who claimed there was no yellow cake in Iraq, No WMDS
are you nuts?
why the desperation?
LET I9T GO
GWB WAS RIGHT
WE WON

Level with me Vern.

Are you related to GWB?

Or were you dropped on your head when you were a baby?

.

 

[JRK]

Still waiting...

No your not, nor have you been

Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn’t fit the media’s neat story line that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It’s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian company for further processing into nuclear fuel—thus keeping it from potential use by terrorists or unsavory regimes in the region. This has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as the AP reported, this marks a ‘significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.’ Seems to us this should be big news. After all, much of the early opposition to the war in Iraq involved claims that President Bush ‘lied’ about weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam posed little if any nuclear threat to the U.S. This more or less proves Saddam in 2003 had a program on hold for building WMD and that he planned to boot it up again soon…Saddam acquired most of his uranium before 1991, but still had it in 2003, when invading U.S. troops found the stuff… That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush’s decision to invade.” —Investor’s Business Daily
No WMD in Iraq Huh? | Pundit Review

Yes, and I'm still waiting.

The yellow cake was identified, labeled and stored back in 1991 and was legally in Iraq when Bush invaded.

You seem to keep skipping over this important detail.



Is that because you are being dishonest or is it because you simply don't understand?

You have no link that proves that
There is not documentation that states that
IN FACT THIS IS FROM Wikipedia WHO CLAIMS PRIOR TO THE 2003 INVASIO IRAQ NEVER HAD ANY STOCKPILED AND AT NO TIME DOES THIS ENTIRE LINK TALK TO THERE BEING EVER YELLOW CAKE URTANIUM IN IRAQ
Nuclear program start date 1959
First nuclear weapon test None
First fusion weapon test None
Last nuclear test None
Largest yield test None
Total tests None
Peak stockpile None
Current stockpile None; programme was infiltrated, abandoned, destroyed by Israel and Iran in 1989. Officially program ended in 1990.
Maximum missile range Al-Hussein (400km)
NPT signatory Yes
NC your out of your leauge
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[BlindBoo]

people CAN ANY OF YOU PRODUCE A DOCUMENT FROM OUR CONSTITUTION THAT STATES THE UN HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE US SENATE OR THE PRESIDENT?

LET ME ADD
ANY AND ALL RESOLUTIONS WITH THE UN AS IT PERTAINS TO IRAQ CANNOT EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUS AS IT WAS SIGNED ON FALSE AND IN- ACCURATE INFORAMTION
jAN 2003 THE UN CLAIMED THAT IRAQ HAD NO "YELLOW CAKE"
Current stockpile None; programme was infiltrated, abandoned, destroyed by Israel and Iran in 1989. Officially program ended in 1990.
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
YET WE4 KNOW NOW THAT SADDAM HAD 550 TONS STOCKPILED
IN FATC IF ANY-ONE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR LYING IT SHOULD BE THE UN.

IN ADDITION THERE WERE OVER 500 MUNITIONS FOUND THAT WERE SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN DECLARED AND DESTROYED YEARS AGO

Please show us where the UN published that. Ever heard of the IAEA?

INVO - Factsheet

No matter how much you lie about it, it was not worth the life of one American, not one.

 

[Contumacious]

No your not, nor have you been

Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn’t fit the media’s neat story line that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It’s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian company for further processing into nuclear fuel—thus keeping it from potential use by terrorists or unsavory regimes in the region. This has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as the AP reported, this marks a ‘significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.’ Seems to us this should be big news. After all, much of the early opposition to the war in Iraq involved claims that President Bush ‘lied’ about weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam posed little if any nuclear threat to the U.S. This more or less proves Saddam in 2003 had a program on hold for building WMD and that he planned to boot it up again soon…Saddam acquired most of his uranium before 1991, but still had it in 2003, when invading U.S. troops found the stuff… That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush’s decision to invade.” —Investor’s Business Daily
No WMD in Iraq Huh? | Pundit Review

Yes, and I'm still waiting.

The yellow cake was identified, labeled and stored back in 1991 and was legally in Iraq when Bush invaded.

You seem to keep skipping over this important detail.



Is that because you are being dishonest or is it because you simply don't understand?

You have no link that proves that
There is not documentation that states that.....

.......Saddam was suicidal?

.

So are you a relative or just brain damaged?

.

 

[Nic_Driver]

No your not, nor have you been

Hear about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium found in Iraq? No? Why should you? It doesn’t fit the media’s neat story line that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no nuclear threat when we invaded in 2003. It’s a little known fact that, after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. found massive amounts of uranium yellowcake, the stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel, at a facility in Tuwaitha outside of Baghdad. In recent weeks, the U.S. secretly has helped the Iraqi government ship it all to Canada, where it was bought by a Canadian company for further processing into nuclear fuel—thus keeping it from potential use by terrorists or unsavory regimes in the region. This has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Yet, as the AP reported, this marks a ‘significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.’ Seems to us this should be big news. After all, much of the early opposition to the war in Iraq involved claims that President Bush ‘lied’ about weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam posed little if any nuclear threat to the U.S. This more or less proves Saddam in 2003 had a program on hold for building WMD and that he planned to boot it up again soon…Saddam acquired most of his uranium before 1991, but still had it in 2003, when invading U.S. troops found the stuff… That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush’s decision to invade.” —Investor’s Business Daily
No WMD in Iraq Huh? | Pundit Review

Yes, and I'm still waiting.

The yellow cake was identified, labeled and stored back in 1991 and was legally in Iraq when Bush invaded.

You seem to keep skipping over this important detail.



Is that because you are being dishonest or is it because you simply don't understand?

You have no link that proves that
There is not documentation that states that
IN FACT THIS IS FROM Wikipedia WHO CLAIMS PRIOR TO THE 2003 INVASIO IRAQ NEVER HAD ANY STOCKPILED AND AT NO TIME DOES THIS ENTIRE LINK TALK TO THERE BEING EVER YELLOW CAKE URTANIUM IN IRAQ
Nuclear program start date 1959
First nuclear weapon test None
First fusion weapon test None
Last nuclear test None
Largest yield test None
Total tests None
Peak stockpile None
Current stockpile None; programme was infiltrated, abandoned, destroyed by Israel and Iran in 1989. Officially program ended in 1990.
Maximum missile range Al-Hussein (400km)
NPT signatory Yes
NC your out of your leauge
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Every link is clear, there was no new yellow cake discovered after Bush invaded. The yellow cake that was found was from as far back as 1981, none later than 1991.

It was known to the UN which was the organization that found, identified, barreled and labeled it a decade before Bush invaded.

It's like talking with a child, seriously...

It's like talking with a child.