Wikileaks...hilary doesn't care that muslim refugees can't be vetted, she wants democrat voters...

[2aguy]

hilary states in the latest Wikileaks leak.......which is why they the democrats dumped the Trump tape Friday.......that muslim refugees cannot be screened for terrorists, and that terrorists are in those groups......

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Said Jordan 'Can't Possibly Vet All Those Refugees' from Syria

The WikiLeaks document dump of Hillary Clinton’s paid speeches revealed the Democratic nominee told a private group in 2013 that the country of Jordan “can’t possibly vet all those [Syrian] refugees … so they don’t know if … jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees.”


Clinton’s remarks, made in an October 28, 2013, speech to the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago’s Vanguard Luncheon, for which she was paid $400,000, according to the Citizen Uprising website, are in stark contrast to the public position she has taken during her current campaign for president.

 

[depotoo]

It won't matter to at least a 3rd of the Dems, progressives- a vote, however they get it is more important than the safety of the US.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

hilary states in the latest Wikileaks leak.......which is why they the democrats dumped the Trump tape Friday.......that muslim refugees cannot be screened for terrorists, and that terrorists are in those groups......

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Said Jordan 'Can't Possibly Vet All Those Refugees' from Syria

The WikiLeaks document dump of Hillary Clinton’s paid speeches revealed the Democratic nominee told a private group in 2013 that the country of Jordan “can’t possibly vet all those [Syrian] refugees … so they don’t know if … jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees.”


Clinton’s remarks, made in an October 28, 2013, speech to the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago’s Vanguard Luncheon, for which she was paid $400,000, according to the Citizen Uprising website, are in stark contrast to the public position she has taken during her current campaign for president.

Sadly, this will go virtually unexamined because of a recording that has been sitting on a shelf for 10 years is suddenly made public. The Dems are the masters of politics, there is NO DOUBT.

 

[gipper]

How is it that Jews, gays, and anti-religion liberals will vote for Hillary, when they see this?

 

[Nia88]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

 

[2aguy]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

 

[Hossfly]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

There would be terrorists among the refugees. Vetting simply means if people can't provide proof of their past history then they can't get in. What's so confusing about that?

 

[Nia88]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

There would be terrorists among the refugees. Vetting simply means if people can't provide proof of their past history then they can't get in. What's so confusing about that?

So what about their past they must prove? And how would they collect this evidence?

 

[Nia88]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

 

[2aguy]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

Because you can't vet them...that is the point.....there are no viable records they can produce because the government there has ceased to function...that is the problem........that is why we need to keep them there, and not here...we can provide aid to them closer to their actual homes and culture.........but the democrats want votes....they don't care about who is coming in with the refugees....

 

[Nia88]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

Because you can't vet them...that is the point.....there are no viable records they can produce because the government there has ceased to function...that is the problem........that is why we need to keep them there, and not here...we can provide aid to them closer to their actual homes and culture.........but the democrats want votes....they don't care about who is coming in with the refugees....

So we leave them there and let them die?

 

[Roudy]

Since when did democrats care about America? They're good at pretending to care for everything they accuse republicans of not caring about.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

The thing is, most of these Syrians just want to get away, and that is why it is a perfect way for the terrorist to come in. Isn't that the whole point? Do you not understand that fact? We know they are not all terrorist, and they know we know they are not all terrorist. Yes, that is the whole point!

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

Because you can't vet them...that is the point.....there are no viable records they can produce because the government there has ceased to function...that is the problem........that is why we need to keep them there, and not here...we can provide aid to them closer to their actual homes and culture.........but the democrats want votes....they don't care about who is coming in with the refugees....

Hey 2aguy, do you ever feel like you are trying to explain astrophysicis to a third grader with these people. Are they really that obtuse or are they just screwing with us?

 

[Hossfly]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

There would be terrorists among the refugees. Vetting simply means if people can't provide proof of their past history then they can't get in. What's so confusing about that?

So what about their past they must prove? And how would they collect this evidence?

Passports are the best way. No passport, no entry. Send them to friendly Arab countries. Why don't you try getting into Canada, Mexico or any other country and see what happens.

 

[mudwhistle]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

You're an idiot.

Watching these people when they travel removes the threat. If they go to a country that is on a watch list as a terrorist sponsor you simply revoke their passport and refuse entry.

 

[airplanemechanic]

So we leave them there and let them die?

If my choices are leave them there and let them die or bring them here and let us die, I'd choose the first one every time.

This isn't simple like it used to be. We USED to have a moral obligation to help refugees of a nation like Syria. However, once we learn that terrorists are embedded within the refugee population only an idiot (i.e. a liberal) would ignore this and continue to let these people in. It's not the refugees fault that the terrorists are embedding themselves, but it sure the shit aint our fault either.

I want to know exactly who we are letting in. Why liberals don't is beyond the realm of sanity.

 

[B. Kidd]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

Because you can't vet them...that is the point.....there are no viable records they can produce because the government there has ceased to function...that is the problem........that is why we need to keep them there, and not here...we can provide aid to them closer to their actual homes and culture.........but the democrats want votes....they don't care about who is coming in with the refugees....

Right you are!

The Soros funded 'Open Society Foundation' exchanges e-mails with Podesta (thanks again, Wikileaks!). This foundation has a plan to enlarge the electorate by 10 million voters registering Democrat. Podesta and the Hill-Beast have their marching orders............

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The thing is, the attacks committed by Muslims in the past years were committed by citizens and not immigrants or refugees. Most of these Syrians refugees just want to get away from ISIS and Assad's slaughter.

And conservatives keep throwing that word vetting around. But with no real solution or way to vet them. Ideological test won't work because people can just lie on them.

Sorry......letting in unvetted muslims is not going to help prevent attacks....and why would you want to increase the chances that well trained terrorists will come in with the refugees.......killers who have experience and are trained vs. untrained American muslims who launch attacks by themselves...these guys will be embedded in a supportive community........it makes no sense to do this....

We could help the people who need help by keeping them over there and providing aid to them there......instead of bringing them here to vote for the democrats.

Ok fine. Vet them. But how? This is my point. People keep saying vetting no real solution or plan. The

Because you can't vet them...that is the point.....there are no viable records they can produce because the government there has ceased to function...that is the problem........that is why we need to keep them there, and not here...we can provide aid to them closer to their actual homes and culture.........but the democrats want votes....they don't care about who is coming in with the refugees....

Right you are!

The Soros funded 'Open Society Foundation' exchanges e-mails with Podesta (thanks again, Wikileaks!). This foundation has a plan to enlarge the electorate by 10 million voters registering Democrat. Podesta and the Hill-Beast have their marching orders............

That would end the United States as we know it.