WIN, WIN, WIN! Trump Unleashes Plan to Cut Two Existing Regulations for Every New Regulation.

[Norman]

Last week was full of win, some people are feeling tired already.

But the serving God-Emperor is confident, it's a new week and what better way to start it than by winning some more.


"President Trump on Monday signed an executive order aimed at rolling back regulations, fulfilling one of his campaign pledges.

Federal agencies will need to revoke two regulations for every new regulation they request."
Trump's Two Out One In Regulatory Rule Could Be His Most Significant Act Yet

Snowflakes will be in tears, this makes far too much common sense, their logic centers will be overloaded. They said Trump wouldn't keep his promises... now they are complaining that he indeed lives up to the hype.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

 

[Norman]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

 

[sartre play]

Would like to see list of regulations being cut, and who they benefit .

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

It's very flummoxing... for a moron.

 

[Smedley VonBuren]

Last week was full of win, some people are feeling tired already.

But the serving God-Emperor is confident, it's a new week and what better way to start it than by winning some more.


"President Trump on Monday signed an executive order aimed at rolling back regulations, fulfilling one of his campaign pledges.

Federal agencies will need to revoke two regulations for every new regulation they request."
Trump's Two Out One In Regulatory Rule Could Be His Most Significant Act Yet

Snowflakes will be in tears, this makes far too much common sense, their logic centers will be overloaded. They said Trump wouldn't keep his promises... now they are complaining that he indeed lives up to the hype.

TRUMP is playing 3 D chess while Dems cry at the podium.

 

[Timmy]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

 

[WillReadmore]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

Do you think congress will be unable to find easy ways to ignore that kind of childishness?

 

[Norman]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

There is nothing arbitrary about it. For every new regulations two existing ones have to be removed. I told you that this would short-circuit the logic centers.

By the end of Trump's term, you will not have committed five felonies by breakfast!

 

[buckeye45_73]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

Oh we can get rid if most of them...thats the point.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The first two regulations he'll want to cut will probably involve financial conflicts of interest regulations for officeholders.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

When do you guys care about wife beating and child porn.. you slap em on the wrist and rehabilitate those degenerates.

But again regulations and laws are different, but we have too many of both.

 

[OldLady]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Try reading some government regs sometime, Norman. I think it's WONDERFUL that he's trying this, but I agree with Boo that the devil is truly in the details. They're ghastly and interwoven like a house of cards.
.

 

[Norman]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Try reading some government regs sometime, Norman. I think it's WONDERFUL that he's trying this, but I agree with Boo that the devil is truly in the details. They're ghastly and interwoven like a house of cards.
.

To think that Trump administration will ignore those details is to think of the insane. Everyone who tries to slip in a new regulation that is two times the size or any other silliness. will be made a laughing stock.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

Do you think congress will be unable to find easy ways to ignore that kind of childishness?

EO's effect Federal Agencies not Congress. Congress can block an EO.

 

[BlindBoo]

Last week was full of win, some people are feeling tired already.

But the serving God-Emperor is confident, it's a new week and what better way to start it than by winning some more.


"President Trump on Monday signed an executive order aimed at rolling back regulations, fulfilling one of his campaign pledges.

Federal agencies will need to revoke two regulations for every new regulation they request."
Trump's Two Out One In Regulatory Rule Could Be His Most Significant Act Yet

Snowflakes will be in tears, this makes far too much common sense, their logic centers will be overloaded. They said Trump wouldn't keep his promises... now they are complaining that he indeed lives up to the hype.

TRUMP is playing 3 D chess while Dems cry at the podium.

BS, The Grabber is stomping though a China shop, with a shotgun.

Too many regulations, Kaboom!

 

[martybegan]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

There are plenty of old laws on the books that could be gotten rid of, like dirgible-jacking, or skipping on the left side of the street.

Same thing with regulations.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Simpy just awesome.

 

[Meathead]

Last week was full of win, some people are feeling tired already.

But the serving God-Emperor is confident, it's a new week and what better way to start it than by winning some more.


"President Trump on Monday signed an executive order aimed at rolling back regulations, fulfilling one of his campaign pledges.

Federal agencies will need to revoke two regulations for every new regulation they request."
Trump's Two Out One In Regulatory Rule Could Be His Most Significant Act Yet

Snowflakes will be in tears, this makes far too much common sense, their logic centers will be overloaded. They said Trump wouldn't keep his promises... now they are complaining that he indeed lives up to the hype.

No one's noticed. Their outrage is focus elsewhere.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Nice as a talking point. But as we've seen, the devil is in the detail. The Grabber is big on talking points, implementation seem to be a bit of an issue. I guess that's the risk you take when you go straight for the prize, huh?

Here is how it's implemented:

Every agency needs to cut two regulations for every new one added.


Exactly what will be problematic about implementing this?

Because it's arbitrary and kind of stupid .

Imagine we did that wh our laws too.

"Hmmm we want to make assaulting police officers a felony . But we'll have to get rid of child pornography and wife beating . "

We have too many useless laws. Thats a very good idea.