Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would trust the EPA ( Pre Orange Dork) over Corporations.
LMFAO!!!!
Corporations get audited.
The EPA just lies and makes money vanish.
Guess which one the LEFT "trusts..."
You got it, the left wing liars who make taxpayer money vanish....
ROFL! I'm sure the EPA could come up with a solution that would bankrupt every farmer in the country.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?
Do you propose to outlaw farming?
No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
Good question. Probably one for the EPA to address. Oh, that's right. No one's home.
You’re wrong, but that’s not the point. Ethonal is very unfriendly to the environment.Ethanol was not used because of emissions. It was done to reduce the use of imported oil.Yes, the ethanol fad must be ended quickly. More energy is required to produce the corn than you obtain, and then there is all of the water and chemicals used. A display of stupid leftist agendas.
Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?
Do you propose to outlaw farming?
No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
Ethanol was used because all that taxpayer subsidies to the farmers bought farmer votes...
There are no Ethanol taxpayer subsidies to the farmers.
ROFL! I'm sure the EPA could come up with a solution that would bankrupt every farmer in the country.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?
Do you propose to outlaw farming?
No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
Good question. Probably one for the EPA to address. Oh, that's right. No one's home.
Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?
Do you propose to outlaw farming?
No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?Do you propose to outlaw farming?
No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
We didn't have this problem fifty years ago.
It's come with the over-use and often indiscriminate application of chemicals.
Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?No, dope.
Obviously the regulations regarding run off are not sufficient. Gutting the EPA does not help.
There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
We didn't have this problem fifty years ago.
It's come with the over-use and often indiscriminate application of chemicals.
How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?
I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.So where do you imagine the water is supposed to go when it rains?
There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
We didn't have this problem fifty years ago.
It's come with the over-use and often indiscriminate application of chemicals.
How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?
Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.
I gaurentee you that farmers were using plenty of chemical fertilizer 50 years ago and agricultural runoff was just as big a problem then as it is now - maybe even worse. You just weren't aware of it because you were some dumb punk kid who didn't know jack shit about anything.Those are for erosion control. Water has to go somewhere. Eventually it ends up in a stream and then a river and then a lake or ocean.There are measures to take to reduce run off from fertilizers, Manures, etc.
Riparian barriers for one.
We didn't have this problem fifty years ago.
It's come with the over-use and often indiscriminate application of chemicals.
How do you know we didn't have the problem 50 years ago? Do you imagine we didn't have fertilizer then? How do you propose to prevent fertilizer from getting into the ground water?
Because I grew up in the region. It's not as much a problem with fertilizer as it is when, how and in what quantity it's applied.
furthermore, no one cared about it 50 years ago. We had more serious things to be concerned about.
Here's the obama river!EPA = waste, fraud and abuse.
EPA has been one of the most successful agencies . How soon we forget the environmental distaster the USA was back in the 70s .
You hate them because they dare to stop your big biz masters from literally destroying the country .
Here's the obama river!EPA = waste, fraud and abuse.
EPA has been one of the most successful agencies . How soon we forget the environmental distaster the USA was back in the 70s .
You hate them because they dare to stop your big biz masters from literally destroying the country .
View attachment 166839
Your obama EPA caused that.Here's the obama river!EPA = waste, fraud and abuse.
EPA has been one of the most successful agencies . How soon we forget the environmental distaster the USA was back in the 70s .
You hate them because they dare to stop your big biz masters from literally destroying the country .
View attachment 166839
Exactly ! Some company caused all that pollution . But hey, you are cool with that.
Your obama EPA caused that.Here's the obama river!EPA = waste, fraud and abuse.
EPA has been one of the most successful agencies . How soon we forget the environmental distaster the USA was back in the 70s .
You hate them because they dare to stop your big biz masters from literally destroying the country .
View attachment 166839
Exactly ! Some company caused all that pollution . But hey, you are cool with that.
Too many regulations, and obama screwed the pooch. The yellow river of barry.Your obama EPA caused that.Here's the obama river!EPA = waste, fraud and abuse.
EPA has been one of the most successful agencies . How soon we forget the environmental distaster the USA was back in the 70s .
You hate them because they dare to stop your big biz masters from literally destroying the country .
View attachment 166839
Exactly ! Some company caused all that pollution . But hey, you are cool with that.
No. They were cleaning up pollution .
Yeah the company they hired screwed up, but let’s not forget how a private company created that pollution to begin with . But you crap on the epa ?