Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you admitting these appointments haven't been done 'by the book'?Okay, and when they make a ruling, let me know, but no Special Prosecutor has ever been appointed by Congress before.
Partisan DOJ? It is my understanding that DOJ personnel put their politics in their back pockets, so to speak. God forbid anything different.The problem here is that you will just leave prosecution of high officials to a partisan DOJ.
So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?Juries don't convict, they determine innocence or guilt. The power to convict lies with the state. How else would plea bargains work? I get it though, you folks have hit a rough patch, you must cling to something as your dreams of a 2024 victory circle the drain.
Being factually makes me feel better. One should not wallow in ignorance.So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?
Due to a recent SCOTUS ruling, He may get a new trial, or, for the left, worse, totally get off, then that would put your 'theory' out the window.So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?
The judge has to accept that verdict.So he’s guilty.
Are you admitting these appointments haven't been done 'by the book'?
Partisan DOJ? It is my understanding that DOJ personnel put their politics in their back pockets, so to speak. God forbid anything different.
Any comment on, say , DOJ created policy regarding prosecuting a sitting president, for example, and the recent Chevron ruling?
I can't find anything in COTUS supporting that, for instance.
Looking more and more like a violation of the SP&P manual.Nope, they've been done exactly by the book. We've been doing it this way since Watergate, and it has mostly worked out okay.
Crap?The recent Chevron ruling was crap... pretty much giving big business a right to pollute your water.
Well that happened already and little Hunter was thrown under the bus...........didn't get the memo?or had given Hunter a sweetheart deal on his gun charge.
Juries don't convict............only find guilt..........a judge has to accept or reject their verdict.trump has been convicted by a jury of his peers, he is a convicted felon.
Kicked the administrative right in the balls for creating and enforcing all types of 'law'.
There's no issue with that, the issue is them creating and enforcing law. Last I checked, that was congresses job."Dun, der, Cleetus, I don't want no administrative state telling me that I can't drink polluted water!!!"
Challenges? Tell that dope, most go where this one is going -- nowhere.Okay, and when they make a ruling, let me know, but no Special Prosecutor has ever been appointed by Congress before.
The problem here is that you will just leave prosecution of high officials to a partisan DOJ. Frankly, I would have been fine with that, rather than appointing a Special Prosecutor, just hand the prosecution of Trump to DOJ prosecutors, he had no immunity at that point not being president anymore.
Challenges? Tell that dope, most go where this one is going -- nowhere.
Trump isn't a criminal, the Insurrection wasn't the Insurrection, COVID was just the flu, the election was rigged, and everyone is corrupt but Trump and his Trumpsters.So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?
2020?U.S. Supreme Court defied Trump at key moments in blockbuster term
By Lawrence Hurley and Jan Wolfe
July 10, 20206:16 AM PDTUpdated 4 years ago
2020?
Triggered again?
