With poll numbers plummeting, Obama returns to bashing Bush

[LibocalypseNow]

"It's all Bush's fault! It's all Bush's fault!" Yea i think most people are getting pretty sick of that tired chit.

 

[MaggieMae]

No quotes to support your post?

Just the accusation?

Typical rightest nonsense.

I saw Obama's comments, he treid to claim Bush was a bigger spender then he is and that people have selective memory about it, a farce considering Obama has spent over a Trillion in just over 6 months.

In short, Obama is again campaigning and not governing, he doesn't show any interest or ability in running things, but he sure loves the camera and crowds.

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

And make sure you pay for that war separately and not out of your own annual defense budget.

 

[MaggieMae]

"It's all Bush's fault! It's all Bush's fault!" Yea i think most people are getting pretty sick of that tired chit.

Of course you can't be bothered researching why that is. Yup. Gotcha. You betcha.

 

[007]

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Looks like we've got someone here that advises obama on what to say... or someone who just regurgitates partisan hack bull shit. You decided.

 

[chanel]

Someone suggested that the WH is going to serve Busch beer today at the Beer Summit. Just in case it doesn't go well they can blame "Busch"

 

[HUGGY]

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Looks like we've got someone here that advises obama on what to say... or someone who just regurgitates partisan hack bull shit. You decided.

Find that elusive BC yet?

 

[Xenophon]

No quotes to support your post?

Just the accusation?

Typical rightest nonsense.

I saw Obama's comments, he treid to claim Bush was a bigger spender then he is and that people have selective memory about it, a farce considering Obama has spent over a Trillion in just over 6 months.

In short, Obama is again campaigning and not governing, he doesn't show any interest or ability in running things, but he sure loves the camera and crowds.

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Take your Meds Huggy and get back to us.
Congress can spend NOTHING without the president's approval unless they pass it was 3/4 majority in both houses.

 

[HUGGY]

I saw Obama's comments, he treid to claim Bush was a bigger spender then he is and that people have selective memory about it, a farce considering Obama has spent over a Trillion in just over 6 months.

In short, Obama is again campaigning and not governing, he doesn't show any interest or ability in running things, but he sure loves the camera and crowds.

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Take your Meds Huggy and get back to us.
Congress can spend NOTHING without the president's approval unless they pass it was 3/4 majority in both houses.

Oh did I forget to mention that congress also writes the legislation for appropriating money?

So after all that work by both houses you blame Obama for doing the will of the peoples representatives by signing off on it. OOOOOOO you smaht. I don't know how you can see so clearly with your head up your ass...astounding!

 

[Xenophon]

Oh did I forget to mention that congress also writes the legislation for appropriating money?

So after all that work by both houses you blame Obama for doing the will of the peoples representatives by signing off on it. OOOOOOO you smaht. I don't know how you can see so clearly with your head up your ass...astounding!

So you now blame the democrats for Bush?

Seeing as they controlled both houses since 2006.

You aern't very good with this whole 'politics' thing Huggems, a few civics lessons are in order for you.

 

[justmarius]

It's still to early for polls to matter. It's simple really. If people perceive that things are actually getting better when the next election cycle rolls around the dems will gain seats. If things get worse, or appear stagnant, then the dems lose seats. As for 2012, Obama has yet to deal with a crises he can call all his own. In otherwords he's yet to be really tested.

 

[MadDog]

No quotes to support your post?

Just the accusation?

Typical rightest nonsense.

I saw Obama's comments, he treid to claim Bush was a bigger spender then he is and that people have selective memory about it, a farce considering Obama has spent over a Trillion in just over 6 months.

In short, Obama is again campaigning and not governing, he doesn't show any interest or ability in running things, but he sure loves the camera and crowds.

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Time for you take a remedial Civics course. The Executive Branch does the spending (except for the budgets given for the day-to-day operations of the Judicial and Legislative Branches).

 

[Jay Canuck]

Obama, the Great Wealth Creator?
by Robert Parry



Excerpt:
In early March, as the Dow sank to about 6,500, CNBC stock analyst Jim Cramer blamed Obama for “the greatest wealth destruction” ever, citing declines in “all indices, since the inauguration of the President,” an attack theme that resonated across the right-wing and much of the mainstream U.S. news media. The numbers were hard to refute. When Obama became President a little over one month earlier, the Dow was at about 8,000, meaning Obama had presided over a decline of nearly 20 percent. But Cramer’s analysis was unfair and – from the perspective of only four months later – clearly wrong. Indeed, if one wanted to label Obama a “great wealth destroyer” for the stock market slide early in his presidency, it would only seem fair to call him now a “great wealth creator,” because the Dow passed the 9,000 mark last week, representing almost a 40 percent rise from the March lows.

 

[007]

Obama spent what? The president doesn't spend anything..congress does. Unless you are a neo con christian fascist like Bush then you start a phoney war and even then you wouldn't put it on the books because you are a liar and a thief and thats just how you roll.

Looks like we've got someone here that advises obama on what to say... or someone who just regurgitates partisan hack bull shit. You decided.

Find that elusive BC yet?

Whether you realize it or not, you've just admitted that obama is still hiding his real birth certificate...

 

[007]

Obama, the Great Wealth Creator?
by Robert Parry



Excerpt:
In early March, as the Dow sank to about 6,500, CNBC stock analyst Jim Cramer blamed Obama for “the greatest wealth destruction” ever, citing declines in “all indices, since the inauguration of the President,” an attack theme that resonated across the right-wing and much of the mainstream U.S. news media. The numbers were hard to refute. When Obama became President a little over one month earlier, the Dow was at about 8,000, meaning Obama had presided over a decline of nearly 20 percent. But Cramer’s analysis was unfair and – from the perspective of only four months later – clearly wrong. Indeed, if one wanted to label Obama a “great wealth destroyer” for the stock market slide early in his presidency, it would only seem fair to call him now a “great wealth creator,” because the Dow passed the 9,000 mark last week, representing almost a 40 percent rise from the March lows.

He had to spend $787,000,000.00 along with countless other bail outs to do it, and strap the country with the largest, single, dollar busting, crippling taxes, debt in the history of America. Now tell me that's wealth...

 

[PixieStix]

the more dirt he throws the more ground he loses

Yep, that is all he is doing

 

[Jay Canuck]

another Birther nut weighs in about cleaning up the mess the Repubs left after 8 years of "governing"

 

[007]

another Birther nut weighs in about cleaning up the mess the Repubs left after 8 years of "governing"

You gotta do better than that if you think you're going to convince anybody of anything around here shit for brains, and insult me, well, you gotta do better than that too cherry. You're a fucking wet behind the ears little faggot with a lot to learn about this place boy.

Get a life or get the fuck going ya dumbass little twat.

 

[Jay Canuck]

great comeback......very sane indeed.

 

[Lycurgus]

another Birther nut weighs in about cleaning up the mess the Repubs left after 8 years of "governing"

What the fuck is a "birther" ?????

 

[007]

great comeback......very sane indeed.

You asked for it. Stay on topic and everything is fine. Start shit and you get shit back. Understand? Good. Remember it.