Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One more liberal judge that will get slapped down on appeal...ho hum!The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”
'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request
The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...www.rawstory.com
The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”
“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.
Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.
But this IS election interference, she’s doing this to influence people. That is the only reason she would want to release this information, knowing it’s probably going to result in a mistrial.Haha, you dummies think any negative facts about the orange rapist are "election interference".
Amateur gaslighters, preparing to try to steal an election.
Of course because the dems really don’t care about the lawI'm sure you and the rest of the cult are wishing that no one is paying attention, but it looks like you won't get your wish.
You only mentioned one.More than one. The lawfare has backfired.
Not until proven so in court, which may not happen nowHe so very fucking guilty.
Dems don't care, so they are paying attention? Are you confused there buddy?Of course because the dems really don’t care about the law
Because a prosecutor is not going to release anything that could exonerate the defendant, they would only release information that helps their own case.I will repeat. He is blocking the release of Jack Smith's evidence. Diaper Don keeps proclaiming his innocence. IF there is evidence of that innocence, why is he continuing to block it?
They don’t care that smith was illegally appointed.Dems don't care, so they are paying attention? Are you confused there buddy?
You keep saying that, but fail to say which court, or what ruling they made to remedy the situation. You're starting to sound like you are just making up shit again.They don’t care that smith was illegally appointed.
There was no evidence from that release. It was an old report we already knew about, a giant nothing burger.The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”
'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request
The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...
The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”
“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.
Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.
Not sure how more specific I can be.You need to be more specific about your point, if you have one.
Tough shit, he gets to play by the same rules as everyone else.I don’t blame him, they are releasing the evidence that has not been tested in court.
The new information the release -- especially his comments about Pence -- really looked bad for him.There was no evidence from that release. It was an old report we already knew about, a giant nothing burger.
It’s just hilarious that Trump fights the release so you guys get all giddy when it does come out, as if it is some big deal. Then….womp womp….there is nothing there anyway.
As an African American you disgust me.Because he knows there is evidence there that the public doesn't yet know about.
We tried throwing his fat ass out with 81 million votes.You tried slander. That didn't work.
You tried lawfare. That didn't work.
You tried assassination. That didn't work.
Vote Trump. Vote for America first for a change...
You're insane, and your posts are worthless.As an African American you disgust me.
And apparently every other judge that has ruled on the matter, including one since Cannon's decision.They don’t care that smith was illegally appointed.
Ohhhhh it's big secret, I see......Because he knows there is evidence there that the public doesn't yet know about.
The orange rapist wants it to be. Go mock him.Ohhhhh it's big secret, I see......
