Woman Lied About Sex With Senator Menendez

[rightwinger]

Which Republican paid a prostitute to lie about Sen Menendez?

Is this the only way Republicans can win elections these days?

Interesting accusation since he wasnt up for reelection. Why would a Republican do that outside of an election year when they cant use it against him?

Yes he was

Now, which slimeball Republican would pay off a prostitute to smear an opponent?

I'm guessing Rush Limbaugh hired the hooker
Karl Rove?

 

[wihosa]

"The woman said a local lawyer had approached her and a fellow escort and asked them to help frame Menendez and a top donor, Salomon Melgen, according to affidavits obtained by The Washington Post."

Why do I suspect that this local lawyer was paid by right wing operatives?

 

[rightwinger]

"The woman said a local lawyer had approached her and a fellow escort and asked them to help frame Menendez and a top donor, Salomon Melgen, according to affidavits obtained by The Washington Post."

Why do I suspect that this local lawyer was paid by right wing operatives?

Very true

Now which Republican paid off the hooker?

1. Rush
2. Hannity
3. Rove
4. McConnell

So many sleazy Republicans to choose from

 

[Avatar4321]

Which Republican paid a prostitute to lie about Sen Menendez?

Is this the only way Republicans can win elections these days?

Interesting accusation since he wasnt up for reelection. Why would a Republican do that outside of an election year when they cant use it against him?

Yes he was

Now, which slimeball Republican would pay off a prostitute to smear an opponent?

I'm guessing Rush Limbaugh hired the hooker
Karl Rove?

So he was. which is odd, never heard of his campaign at all. Nor any opponent.

You seriously think Republicans are going to waste time paying off people in a state they cant win?

 

[Avatar4321]

"The woman said a local lawyer had approached her and a fellow escort and asked them to help frame Menendez and a top donor, Salomon Melgen, according to affidavits obtained by The Washington Post."

Why do I suspect that this local lawyer was paid by right wing operatives?

Very true

Now which Republican paid off the hooker?

1. Rush
2. Hannity
3. Rove
4. McConnell

So many sleazy Republicans to choose from

The question is which story is correct and who's actually paying. We may never know. But you better find some evidence if you think you are going to successfullly accuse any of them.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

If you lie about sex, for money, is that prostitution?

 

[rightwinger]

"The woman said a local lawyer had approached her and a fellow escort and asked them to help frame Menendez and a top donor, Salomon Melgen, according to affidavits obtained by The Washington Post."

Why do I suspect that this local lawyer was paid by right wing operatives?

Very true

Now which Republican paid off the hooker?

1. Rush
2. Hannity
3. Rove
4. McConnell

So many sleazy Republicans to choose from

The question is which story is correct and who's actually paying. We may never know. But you better find some evidence if you think you are going to successfullly accuse any of them.

I need evidence before I can accuse someone?

Who says?

Maybe I just hire a hooker to say Rush did it

 

[wihosa]

"The woman said a local lawyer had approached her and a fellow escort and asked them to help frame Menendez and a top donor, Salomon Melgen, according to affidavits obtained by The Washington Post."

Why do I suspect that this local lawyer was paid by right wing operatives?

Very true

Now which Republican paid off the hooker?

1. Rush
2. Hannity
3. Rove
4. McConnell

So many sleazy Republicans to choose from

Very true

Now which Republican paid off the hooker?

1. Rush
2. Hannity
3. Rove
4. McConnell

So many sleazy Republicans to choose from

The question is which story is correct and who's actually paying. We may never know. But you better find some evidence if you think you are going to successfullly accuse any of them.

I need evidence before I can accuse someone?

Who says?

Maybe I just hire a hooker to say Rush did it[/

Why would a "local lawyer" want to set up a US senator unless someone made it worth his while, and why would anyone but the radical right want to make it worth his while?
Deductive reasoning my dear Watson!

 

[Avatar4321]

I need evidence before I can accuse someone?

Who says?

Maybe I just hire a hooker to say Rush did it

Well, you could always be a complete @$$ and accuse people without evidence.

Or you could just not accuse people of anything whatsoever. Everyone's looking to accuse others of something rather than taking care of their own responsibilities.

 

[Avatar4321]

Why would a "local lawyer" want to set up a US senator unless someone made it worth his while, and why would anyone but the radical right want to make it worth his while?
Deductive reasoning my dear Watson!

Perhaps a Democrat wanted to set it up so the accusation would be exposed as a lie to blame Republicans. Perhaps the local lawyer just has some personal issues with the Senator. Who the heck knows? This is specifically why it helps to have evidence before jumping to conclusions.

 

[Mustang]

.
Woman Lied About Sex With Senator Menendez, Her Lawyer Says - NYTimes.com

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 4, 2013


SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic (AP) — A Dominican woman who said in a video that she had had sex with Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey for money is acknowledging that the story is false, according to her sworn statement released by a lawyer enmeshed in the scandal.

The lawyer, Vinicio Castillo Semán, said at a news conference on Monday that the woman, identified as Nexis de los Santos, 23, had said in a sworn statement not only that she had never gone “to bed with” Mr. Menendez, but also that she had never met him.


<snip>

.

Actually, what >I<heard is that she said she was PAID to lie about Menendez.

 

[wihosa]

Why would a "local lawyer" want to set up a US senator unless someone made it worth his while, and why would anyone but the radical right want to make it worth his while?
Deductive reasoning my dear Watson!

Perhaps a Democrat wanted to set it up so the accusation would be exposed as a lie to blame Republicans. Perhaps the local lawyer just has some personal issues with the Senator. Who the heck knows? This is specifically why it helps to have evidence before jumping to conclusions.

So you think it more likely that this local lawyer has a personal issue with the senator than that this was a "Rovian" dirty trick. Your bending so far over backwards you're looking upside down.

 

[g5000]

I think many of the rubes who drank the Daily Caller's piss about Menendez without evidence are now going to convince themselves it was all a Democratic setup, again without evidence.

People will go to great mental lengths to deny they were conned by their own team.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Was she lying for pay then or is she lying for pay now?

 

[g5000]

Was she lying for pay then or is she lying for pay now?

The claim was that Menendez has been seeing child hookers for years. There should be a lot of corroborating evidence if that is true.

Since no such evidence has been produced, it does not look good for those making the claim.

That won't stop some people from repeating the claim as fact, though. The desire to believe overrides their low voltage parrot brains.

 

[Mustang]

I think many of the rubes who drank the Daily Caller's piss about Menendez without evidence are now going to convince themselves it was all a Democratic setup, again without evidence.

People will go to great mental lengths to deny they were conned by their own team.

Pete Seeger's lyrics in "Where Have All The Flowers Gone" comes to mind, yet again.

 

[wihosa]

Was she lying for pay then or is she lying for pay now?

The claim was that Menendez has been seeing child hookers for years. There should be a lot of corroborating evidence if that is true.

Since no such evidence has been produced, it does not look good for those making the claim.

That won't stop some people from repeating the claim as fact, though. The desire to believe overrides their low voltage parrot brains.

Why stop repeating it, look at how the other right wing stories (lies) have panned out. I mean with the death panels now operating all over the country and ...

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Was she lying for pay then or is she lying for pay now?

The claim was that Menendez has been seeing child hookers for years. There should be a lot of corroborating evidence if that is true.

Yes. I am sure that child prostitutes keep excellent records.

Since no such evidence has been produced, it does not look good for those making the claim.

But a prostitute SAID so! Well, yeah. She MIGHT have been paid to SAY so. Or, perhaps, she's merely getting paid to deny the truth of what she said before.

I'm getting dizzy.

That won't stop some people from repeating the claim as fact, though. The desire to believe overrides their low voltage parrot brains.

Which claim? The claim that he paid for sex? The claim that the prostitute he paid to have sex with was a minor? The claim that the allegation was paid for? Or the claim that the recantation was paid for?


Personally, I have no idea if Sen. Bob the blob Menendez even has a dick. So, who the hell knows if he fucked a child in the DR?

 

[rightwinger]

I need evidence before I can accuse someone?

Who says?

Maybe I just hire a hooker to say Rush did it

Well, you could always be a complete @$$ and accuse people without evidence.

Or you could just not accuse people of anything whatsoever. Everyone's looking to accuse others of something rather than taking care of their own responsibilities.

You mean have actuial facts and evidence before I start blindly accusing someone of a crime like child molesting?

Nah.............I'd rather just hire a hooker to say Rush Limbaugh hired her

More fun that way

 

[g5000]

Was she lying for pay then or is she lying for pay now?

The claim was that Menendez has been seeing child hookers for years. There should be a lot of corroborating evidence if that is true.

Yes. I am sure that child prostitutes keep excellent records.

You probably think you are being clever, but tell us, dumbass, on what basis was the claim of Menendez paying for sex with children over a period of years made then? Since child hookers don't keep records, then where did this claim arise from?