Would a President Hillary enact Australia-style gun confiscation as she recommended last October?

[CrusaderFrank]

We are one gun-grabbing Progressive Fascist SCOTUS away from losing the 2nd Amendment, we already lost 1st, 4th and 5th

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

If you think the Obama gun confiscations were bad......wait till you see Hillary

The rubes are going to go bankrupt buying more guns for Hillary to confiscate.

These fucking idiots have caused the prices of weapons to skyrocket. I have a special hatred for them.

I remember getting this in an email in 2009 after Obama took office. Knew it was horse shit then and has been proven to be horse shit now.

Here is the Brady Gun Violence Prevention Report Card for Obama:

NA President Barack Obama II Democratic F
The Voter's Self Defense System

But the wing nuts didn't let that stop them from stocking up.

 

[g5000]

He didn't because he never intended to. He never made any effort at all to grab your guns.

But the American gun industry sure does appreciate all of the fear mongering of the Right Wing- it was great for gun sales!

Why were gun businesses on the hit list of Operation Choke Point if Obama isn't anti-gun?

Do you think a fraud and money laundering operation should be excluded from a program to stop fraud and money laundering just because they sell guns?

Man, that would be seriously retarded. You aren't seriously retarded, are you? Please tell us you are just a parroting creduloid who doesn't investigate the facts and not a seriously retarded person.

If business is part of illegal fraud and money laundering, the the people involved should be arrested and prosecuted.

In like, say, an operation? Like, say, an operation called Operation Choke Point?

Hmmm...that's brilliant!

Selling guns does not make a business a money laundering operation,but selling guns does make it a target for Operation Choke Point.

Nope. Money laundering makes it a target for Operation Choke Point.

Duh!

You don't know what operation choke point did.

Not all gun sellers were targeted, and not all those targeted were gun sellers. In fact, most of them were payday lenders and companies that process credit and debit card transactions.

So I guess we're going to have to come down on the "seriously retarded" verdict in your case. That's a damn shame.

 

[rightwinger]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

 

[martybegan]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

The only reason more stringent laws have not happened is because any increase is fought tooth and nail. That you have only mockery as a response is telling.

If Heller is overturned Places like NYC, Chicago and other big cities would impose bans in a second. and they would also either not renew existing permits or demand turnover or removal from the jurisdictions.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

I see these special idiots at gun shows. Buying bogus survivalist shit, spending fortunes on body armor, ranting about darkies in the wire, zapping each other with stun guns.

Fucking herd mentality dumbasses.

Otherwise known as Trump's base.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Right. At the same time he was making sure we could keep our doctors and health plans.

 

[Rustic]

Even if Clinton wanted to confiscate our guns in a mandatory buyback program, she'd never be able to get such a plan passed in the US. Not matter how much she wanted to, and no matter how many more schoolkids get slaughtered.

If a so called "buyback program" was to be tried, millions would die on all sides. Because anyone knows a buyback program absolutely would never work, it would just bring more death just like more laws equal more crime…

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

 

[g5000]

Even if Clinton wanted to confiscate our guns in a mandatory buyback program, she'd never be able to get such a plan passed in the US. Not matter how much she wanted to, and no matter how many more schoolkids get slaughtered.

If a so called "buyback program" was to be tried, millions would die on all sides. Because anyone knows a buyback program absolutely would never work, it would just bring more death just like more laws equal more crime…

The mandatory buyback program in Australia was very effective.

It will never happen here.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Right. At the same time he was making sure we could keep our doctors and health plans.

I wanted to keep mine until I got a better one under his plan.
Otherwise, do you realize what you are actually saying here? Funny as shit.

 

[Preacher]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Would be fascinating she would be first woman president and then first president executed for treason

 

[Rustic]

Even if Clinton wanted to confiscate our guns in a mandatory buyback program, she'd never be able to get such a plan passed in the US. Not matter how much she wanted to, and no matter how many more schoolkids get slaughtered.

If a so called "buyback program" was to be tried, millions would die on all sides. Because anyone knows a buyback program absolutely would never work, it would just bring more death just like more laws equal more crime…

The mandatory buyback program in Australia was very effective.

It will never happen here.

It's delusional to think that it would work here, there would be literally would be millions of dead people on all sides of it were to be tried...

 

[g5000]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

There are 600 FEMA camps. You can't go to a 7-Eleven for a slurpee without having to go around a goddam FEMA camp.

And don't even get me started on Operation Jade Helm. The UN, operating out of Walmart basements, has taken over the entire southwestern United States!

That Kenyan-born Muslim in the White House is a maniac who should have been impeached the moment he signed his first Executive Order!

 

[Little-Acorn]

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

There are 600 FEMA camps. You can't go to a 7-Eleven for a slurpee without having to go around a goddam FEMA camp. And don't even get me started on Operation Jade Helm. The UN, operating out of Walmart basements, has taken over the entire southwestern United States! That Kenyan-born Muslim in the White House is a maniac!

When leftist fanatics convincingly lose the debate, they usually start ranting hysterically like this.

It's been happening quite a lot recently.

 

[Rustic]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

There are 600 FEMA camps. You can't go to a 7-Eleven for a slurpee without having to go around a goddam FEMA camp.

And don't even get me started on Operation Jade Helm. The UN, operating out of Walmart basements, has taken over the entire southwestern United States!

I don't believe in most of these conspiracys, but one thing is for sure we don't want the UN involved in this country whatsoever you can not get more corrupt and clueless than the UN…

 

[rightwinger]

Last October, Hillary praised Australia's gun confiscation program, and said it would be worth taking a look at for this country.

In 1996 Australia passed laws requiring its subjects to turn in their guns. Though the government tried to disguise what they were doing by calling it a "purchase" or a "buyback program", the subject had no choice in the matter. People who didn't want to turn in their gun, faced fines or imprisonment, and lost their gun anyway. And it was hardly a "purchase", which implies that the "seller" was a willing participant. If he's being forced to give up his property against his will, it's either confiscation or theft, regardless of the thief sticking money in his pocket afterward.

And calling it a "buyback program", is even more disingenuous, implying that the government owned the gun in the past and thus had some right to it.

Last October, Hillary said that such a program is "worth considering" in the U.S. She carefully didn't mention that the 2nd amendment flatly forbids such a thing.

If she becomes President, is there any reason to believe she won't do what she said she wanted to do? Lying and illegality has never bothered her before, why would they now?

--------------------------------------------------

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

Hillary: Australia-style gun control ‘worth looking at’

by Bradford Richardson
October 16, 2015, 02:46 pm

Hillary Clinton says a gun buyback program similar to the one Australia implemented in 1996 is “worth considering” in the United States.

“I don’t know enough details to tell you how we would do it or how it would work, but certainly the Australia example is worth looking at,” Clinton said at a New Hampshire town hall on Friday.

The Democratic presidential front-runner said data indicate the Australian program reduced the number of firearms in circulation by paying citizens to turn over their weapons.

“The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns, and then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having, you know, more of a background-check approach, more of a permitting approach,” Clinton said.

Not possible...Obama took all the guns...as we were warned about for years.

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

They told me they had one of those Predator drones flying over my house and if I didn't hand over all my guns, I would end up like Osama bin Laden

 

[BlindBoo]

As usual, the gun-rights-hating fanatics are trying desperately to shout, "No, no! She didn't really mean that! She meant, um, ah, something else!!!" Followed by frantic scrabbling to figure what else she might have meant.

Aren't these people a blast to watch?

Hell hath no fury like a bunch of leftist fanatics suddenly seeing their cherished ideas disproven and dying by the roadside.

For the record I own 4 guns.

 

[rightwinger]

Obama goon squads took my guns early in 2009

Mine too. They landed in our front yard in black helicopters and muscled their way into our house. They shouted, "You wanna' go to a FEMA camp or just hand over that gun instead?"

When leftist fanatics convincingly lose the debate, they usually start ranting hysterically.

It's been happening quite a lot recently.

Ranting hysterically at someone starting a "Hillary is going to take our guns" thread?

 

[g5000]

As usual, the gun-rights-hating fanatics are trying desperately to shout, "No, no! She didn't really mean that! She meant, um, ah, something else!!!" Followed by frantic scrabbling to figure what else she might have meant.

Aren't these people a blast to watch?

Hell hath no fury like a bunch of leftist fanatics suddenly seeing their cherished ideas disproven and dying by the roadside.

For the record I own 4 guns.

Yeahbut you had 273 before Obama came and took most of 'em.