Would you support a presidential candidate who held that biblical law superceded the Constitution?

When liberals raise such questions, I like to point out that nearly all liberals believe that secular humanist principles and/or "international law" supersede the Constitution. Liberal Supreme Court judges have routinely ignored the Constitution because they felt that "civil rights" or "human rights" or their idea of "progress" superseded the Constitution.

If the Constitution is accurately interpreted, i.e., in accordance with original intent, there will never be conflict between it and biblical law. For one thing, if we were following original intent, most of the hot button issues that have come before the Supreme Court in the last 50 years would have been left to the states to work out. That way, if you were living in a state and you found its laws and policies intolerable, you could simply move to a state more to your liking.
Mike is a buffoon, putting it very nicely. Read him on economics, the Constitution, and mormonism.

In fact, the reality is that organized religious beliefs never supersede the Constitution in our law's operation..
 
You have to support your position, and he was not. If you are concerned about rdean, challenge him on it.
 
Jesus approved a slavery.

Women should marry their rapist.

Wearing two kinds of material at the same time deserves the death penalty.

I love Biblical law.
His position..... if you call it that. Challenge him on Chapter and verse for a filthy racist disgusting vile "position"
 
The Constitution was based on Biblical teachings and written during the time when followers of Mohammed were raping boys, subjugating women and murdering non believers. Come to think of it times haven't changed much.
 
Oh, by the way:

Our Declaration of Independence is based off of these verses, which acknowledge and teach the value of objective moral values, fixed standards, absolute truth, and the sanctity of all life.

Exodus 20:1-17
Deuteronomy 30:19
Psalm 119:142-152
Proverbs 14:34
Isaiah 5:20-21
John 10:10
Romans 2:15
Hebrews 13:8

For our system of checks and balances, they are based on the principle that all men are sinners:

Genesis 8:21
Jeremiah 17:9
Mark 7:20-23
Romans 3:23
1 John 1:8

For wisdom on the three branches of government, the Judicial, Executive and Legislative see Isaiah 33:22

Religious freedom as stated in the First Amendment can be found in 1 Timothy 2:1-2

Separation of Church from State:

Deuteronomy 17:18-20
1 Kings 3:28
Ezra 7:24
Nehemiah 8:2
1 Samuel 7:15, 10:27, and 15:10-31
2 Samuel 12:1-18
Matthew 14:3-4
Luke 3:7-14 and 11:52
Acts 4:26-29

Article IV of the Constitution, which guarantees a Republican form of Government to all the states is based off of these verses:

Exodus 18:21
Deuteronomy 1:13
Judges 8:22-23
1 Samuel 8
Proverbs 11:14 and 24:6

The First, Second, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments all stress the importance of governing oneself and his family, as the first level of governance and are based off of these verses:

Matthew 18:15-18
Galatians 5:16-26
1 Corinthians 6:1-11
1 Timothy 3:1-5
Titus 2:1-8

The Fifth Amendment grants the right to life, liberty, and property, and is based off of Exodus 20:15-17


The Sixth Amendment grants a fair trial to those tried in our justice system, and is based off of these verses:

Exodus 20:16
Deuteronomy 19:15
Proverbs 24:28 and 25:18
Matthew 18:16
This fails as an appeal to authority fallacy.
Don't worr christians won't be head you for your worship of government and your messiah Obama

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
Re another thread here regarding a presidential candidate that held a particular religion superceded the Constitution. My own view is there is no religion that supercedes the Constitution.
Sure! There are SOME useful things in the bible...can we stone adulterers? :D
 
If the law of God is that thou shall commit no murder but it is "legally" supplanted by some man made law that requires a citizen to turn in a Jew for extermination (just as one historical example from another country), I'd say God's law trumps the law of that land.

I think only a Nazi would disagree.


Yes you democrats do...... how many babies slaughtered since 74?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk


A child dies somewhere because of disease, hunger, or abuse every 4 seconds, 20,000 a day. More than 140 million in the last 20 years. Where are you? Have you sold all your possessions to help these babies?

Or do you ignore them every day because you really don't give shit... uh huh

Hunger and disease isn't premeditated. abortions are but I don't expect socialists like you and the Nazi to understand that.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk


You are a flaming hypocrite who couldn't care less about 'aborted babies' or any other baby. You are just another of the myriad masses of hypocrites who like to feel good by claiming the fake high ground.

Another 24 hours went by and you did nothing.

20,000 more... and god is watching...

Don't compare me to you progressives. I have taken care of progressive assholes kids who abandoned them since I have been a adult. So fuck you and your death cult

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
Jesus approved a slavery.

Women should marry their rapist.

Wearing two kinds of material at the same time deserves the death penalty.

I love Biblical law.

Your dishonesty and Biblically proportioned MIS-comprehension of Biblical (and all other kinds of) "law" is every bit as laughable as your political philosophy and your grasp on the art of persuasion, rderp. You dishonest twat.
 
Re another thread here regarding a presidential candidate that held a particular religion superceded the Constitution. My own view is there is no religion that supercedes the Constitution.
The Bible teaches us to obey man's law unless or until it breaks God's law
Chapter and Verse, please.


(Romans 13:1)--"Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God."
 
Re another thread here regarding a presidential candidate that held a particular religion superceded the Constitution. My own view is there is no religion that supercedes the Constitution.
The Bible teaches us to obey man's law unless or until it breaks God's law
Chapter and Verse, please.


(Romans 13:1)--"Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God."
They believe that only when their guy wins. Like most things in the Bible to American Christians, it's optional.
 
A child dies somewhere because of disease, hunger, or abuse every 4 seconds, 20,000 a day. More than 140 million in the last 20 years. Where are you? Have you sold all your possessions to help these babies?

So, am I to presume you are willing to do the same thing you're demanding of him? Of course not. Your compassion is hollow.

You're funny.

That's what nat says. So answer the question. You are willing to make these demands of other people "FEED THE CHILDREN!", yet aren't willing to do so yourself. Why?
 
Jesus approved a slavery.

Women should marry their rapist.

Wearing two kinds of material at the same time deserves the death penalty.

I love Biblical law.
Chapter and verse where he said that he approved such things, jerk. He was a new deal that went for minutus 0f 613 commandments to 1.

For that matter, find some resource in Josephus or some other resource, roman or sanhedrin imposed such rules.

where in Jewish tradition would a woman be compelled to marry their rapist?

Where would there be a death penalty for Chatnes?


You are a sleaze, an ignoramus, a bigot... a fool.
Yea, we got another fucktard who has never read the Bible. I love these fools. Always so easy to trap. It's because their ignorance puts them in a iron and unbreakable bubble. So let's get to it:

This is Jesus talking directly to Timothy:

1 Timothy 6:1-2 NLT
Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed. If your master is a Christian, that is no excuse for being disrespectful. You should work all the harder because you are helping another believer by your efforts. Teach these truths, Timothy, and encourage everyone to obey them.

True, this isn't coming directly from Jesus, but it is in the Bible. Worse, remember what Jesus said about punishing slaves in Luke 12:47-48 NLT.

Ephesians 6:5 NLT
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ.

As far as rape goes:

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT
If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

But that's not the only mention of rape. Go take a look at:
Numbers 31:7-18 NLT
Deuteronomy 20:10-14

and don't forget this one:
Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB
Death to the rape victim.

The list goes on.

Everyone knows Leviticus 19:19 and Deuteronomy 22:9-11. And the ban on wearing two types of fabric.

So don't worry about the apology, I've already accepted it.
 
Jesus approved a slavery.

Women should marry their rapist.

Wearing two kinds of material at the same time deserves the death penalty.

I love Biblical law.

Your dishonesty and Biblically proportioned MIS-comprehension of Biblical (and all other kinds of) "law" is every bit as laughable as your political philosophy and your grasp on the art of persuasion, rderp. You dishonest twat.
I don't accept your apology. You're simply too stupid to be bothered with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top