JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
Mike is a buffoon, putting it very nicely. Read him on economics, the Constitution, and mormonism.When liberals raise such questions, I like to point out that nearly all liberals believe that secular humanist principles and/or "international law" supersede the Constitution. Liberal Supreme Court judges have routinely ignored the Constitution because they felt that "civil rights" or "human rights" or their idea of "progress" superseded the Constitution.
If the Constitution is accurately interpreted, i.e., in accordance with original intent, there will never be conflict between it and biblical law. For one thing, if we were following original intent, most of the hot button issues that have come before the Supreme Court in the last 50 years would have been left to the states to work out. That way, if you were living in a state and you found its laws and policies intolerable, you could simply move to a state more to your liking.
In fact, the reality is that organized religious beliefs never supersede the Constitution in our law's operation..