Wow, Republicans expanded their majority in the House last night

[Faun]

The Democratic Party has results in Virginia and that overwhelming healthcare vote in Maine.

While your republic party has a label of being the party of dumb.

Run on that next year.

Nah....Economy and stock market are rallying, unemployment at record lows. ISIS demolished, foreign enemies fear and respect us, illegal immigration down by 70%., tax breaks, supreme court and other circuit judges replaced. Now you know what the republicans will be running and winning.

Dems have NOTHING to run on.

Now the asswipe Reubicans like Trump take credit for Obama's successes.

Wow.

We had Bill Clinton who balanced the budget, along came Bush Jr, put in tax cuts & took us to the worst recession in 80 year.

Along comes Obama & fixes the mess Bush made & left the Republicans once again with a growing economy, lowering unemployment rates, a climbing stock market, a lowing deficit. Now comes the Republicabs getting another tax cut.

I guess you are too fucking stupid to see the pattern here.

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

 

[Roudy]

Nah....Economy and stock market are rallying, unemployment at record lows. ISIS demolished, foreign enemies fear and respect us, illegal immigration down by 70%., tax breaks, supreme court and other circuit judges replaced. Now you know what the republicans will be running and winning.

Dems have NOTHING to run on.

Now the asswipe Reubicans like Trump take credit for Obama's successes.

Wow.

We had Bill Clinton who balanced the budget, along came Bush Jr, put in tax cuts & took us to the worst recession in 80 year.

Along comes Obama & fixes the mess Bush made & left the Republicans once again with a growing economy, lowering unemployment rates, a climbing stock market, a lowing deficit. Now comes the Republicabs getting another tax cut.

I guess you are too fucking stupid to see the pattern here.

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

 

[busybee01]

Northram did win those Congressional districts you idiot. The 2nd district looks like the best pickup opportunity while the 7th is within striking distance. None of the Democrat seats seem to be in play. Also worth noting that Northram did better than Clinton in every CD.

If you are not having a Congressional race, what difference does it make? All you have is someone creating an artificial assumption of how people would vote IF there had been a Congressional race, but devoid of actual candidates, it means about as much as the difference in your IQ and room tem! Nothing at all!

It means quite a bit. It tells us that 5 seats are safely in GOP hands and 4 safely in Democrat hands. The 2nd district will be a battleground and the 7th could be hard fought. It gives us clues into what voters may be thinking. It suggests that healthcare may be a major issue. and taxes and immigration may not. We are largely talking about House seats in blue and swing states.

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

 

[busybee01]

ACORN? You think ACORN is equivalent to Republican gerrymandering?

You are confused on the Russian thong. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm who investigated Trumnp's activities in Russia. Trump's campaign had several secret meetings with Russian government officials & then lied about it.

LOL. The Clinton campaign is calling treason and collusion "opposition research" and parrots like you just repeat their lies and deceptions.

Whereas Trump never did anything remotely close to what Hillary and the Dems did. Face it.

Blind, deaf and certainly dumb.


How insecurely proud of yourself you are.

In other words, ya got nothing but more whining.

The Democratic Party has results in Virginia and that overwhelming healthcare vote in Maine.

While your republic party has a label of being the party of dumb.

Run on that next year.

Nah....Economy and stock market are rallying, unemployment at record lows. ISIS demolished, foreign enemies fear and respect us, illegal immigration down by 70%., tax breaks, supreme court and other circuit judges replaced. Now you know what the republicans will be running and winning.

Dems have NOTHING to run on.

They have quite a bit to run on. Voters trust Democrats more than they do on healthcare. Voters are not enthused with Republican plans on taxes especially when they raise taxes on middle class people. .

 

[busybee01]

Bitch, if it wasn't for gerrymandered districts you cowards have to have in order get fuckin votes, you bitches couldn't win shit...so don't be hating on the dem's, you bastards can't do shit without cheating

Ha ha ha. Spoken like a true Leftwing nutjob. Does the name ACORN ring a bell? How about Dona Brazil and Hillary's nomination rigging and then colluding with the Russians to rig the elections? Sad part is despite all that crookedness you didn't win. You shameless Dems haven't held an honest election in decades. There's always some horrific stink that comes out afterwards.

ACORN? You think ACORN is equivalent to Republican gerrymandering?

You are confused on the Russian thong. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm who investigated Trumnp's activities in Russia. Trump's campaign had several secret meetings with Russian government officials & then lied about it.

LOL. The Clinton campaign is calling treason and collusion "opposition research" and parrots like you just repeat their lies and deceptions.

Whereas Trump never did anything remotely close to what Hillary and the Dems did. Face it.

You are a fucking idiot. Trump sent members of his campaign to meet with the Russian government and then said no one from his campaign met with any Russian.

Whren did Clinton do that?

Trump didn't do any of that. An attorney contacted Don Jr. claiming that they had damning evidence on Hillary. They took the meeting and she came up empty handed. You guys as usual have nothing, just a lot of bullshit fake news and hyperventilating. To the rest of sane Americans, it's "so what?!"

Doesn't matter what she actually had. Members of Trump's campaign went there expecting to get dirt on Clinton. Also Carter Page and Papadopolous had contact with Russians. Americans think it is a lot more than "so what."

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If you are not having a Congressional race, what difference does it make? All you have is someone creating an artificial assumption of how people would vote IF there had been a Congressional race, but devoid of actual candidates, it means about as much as the difference in your IQ and room tem! Nothing at all!

It means quite a bit. It tells us that 5 seats are safely in GOP hands and 4 safely in Democrat hands. The 2nd district will be a battleground and the 7th could be hard fought. It gives us clues into what voters may be thinking. It suggests that healthcare may be a major issue. and taxes and immigration may not. We are largely talking about House seats in blue and swing states.

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

I wasn't aware that Congress passed a healthcare bill? Did they do that today while I was watching the game?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ha ha ha. Spoken like a true Leftwing nutjob. Does the name ACORN ring a bell? How about Dona Brazil and Hillary's nomination rigging and then colluding with the Russians to rig the elections? Sad part is despite all that crookedness you didn't win. You shameless Dems haven't held an honest election in decades. There's always some horrific stink that comes out afterwards.

ACORN? You think ACORN is equivalent to Republican gerrymandering?

You are confused on the Russian thong. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm who investigated Trumnp's activities in Russia. Trump's campaign had several secret meetings with Russian government officials & then lied about it.

LOL. The Clinton campaign is calling treason and collusion "opposition research" and parrots like you just repeat their lies and deceptions.

Whereas Trump never did anything remotely close to what Hillary and the Dems did. Face it.

You are a fucking idiot. Trump sent members of his campaign to meet with the Russian government and then said no one from his campaign met with any Russian.

Whren did Clinton do that?

Trump didn't do any of that. An attorney contacted Don Jr. claiming that they had damning evidence on Hillary. They took the meeting and she came up empty handed. You guys as usual have nothing, just a lot of bullshit fake news and hyperventilating. To the rest of sane Americans, it's "so what?!"

Doesn't matter what she actually had. Members of Trump's campaign went there expecting to get dirt on Clinton. Also Carter Page and Papadopolous had contact with Russians. Americans think it is a lot more than "so what."

It is not illegal to do any of that despite the fact that is zero evidence that they did!

 

[Roudy]

If you are not having a Congressional race, what difference does it make? All you have is someone creating an artificial assumption of how people would vote IF there had been a Congressional race, but devoid of actual candidates, it means about as much as the difference in your IQ and room tem! Nothing at all!

It means quite a bit. It tells us that 5 seats are safely in GOP hands and 4 safely in Democrat hands. The 2nd district will be a battleground and the 7th could be hard fought. It gives us clues into what voters may be thinking. It suggests that healthcare may be a major issue. and taxes and immigration may not. We are largely talking about House seats in blue and swing states.

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.

 

[RealDave]

It means quite a bit. It tells us that 5 seats are safely in GOP hands and 4 safely in Democrat hands. The 2nd district will be a battleground and the 7th could be hard fought. It gives us clues into what voters may be thinking. It suggests that healthcare may be a major issue. and taxes and immigration may not. We are largely talking about House seats in blue and swing states.

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

I wasn't aware that Congress passed a healthcare bill? Did they do that today while I was watching the game?

So, they presented no plan?

Really?

 

[RealDave]

It means quite a bit. It tells us that 5 seats are safely in GOP hands and 4 safely in Democrat hands. The 2nd district will be a battleground and the 7th could be hard fought. It gives us clues into what voters may be thinking. It suggests that healthcare may be a major issue. and taxes and immigration may not. We are largely talking about House seats in blue and swing states.

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.

This time we don;t have 4 years of Clinton investigations that were based on found nothing.

Now we have Trump investigations. Now people are well aware just how big an asshole Trump really is. Republicans will need to either embrace Trump & lose the traditional Republican vote or stay clear & lose the bigoted racist vote.

I have a hint, supporting Roy Moore isn't helping

 

[RealDave]

ACORN? You think ACORN is equivalent to Republican gerrymandering?

You are confused on the Russian thong. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm who investigated Trumnp's activities in Russia. Trump's campaign had several secret meetings with Russian government officials & then lied about it.

LOL. The Clinton campaign is calling treason and collusion "opposition research" and parrots like you just repeat their lies and deceptions.

Whereas Trump never did anything remotely close to what Hillary and the Dems did. Face it.

You are a fucking idiot. Trump sent members of his campaign to meet with the Russian government and then said no one from his campaign met with any Russian.

Whren did Clinton do that?

Trump didn't do any of that. An attorney contacted Don Jr. claiming that they had damning evidence on Hillary. They took the meeting and she came up empty handed. You guys as usual have nothing, just a lot of bullshit fake news and hyperventilating. To the rest of sane Americans, it's "so what?!"

Doesn't matter what she actually had. Members of Trump's campaign went there expecting to get dirt on Clinton. Also Carter Page and Papadopolous had contact with Russians. Americans think it is a lot more than "so what."

It is not illegal to do any of that despite the fact that is zero evidence that they did!

Campaigns can not accept donations from foreign governments. Trump coordinating with a foreign government to place ads is indeed a crime.

 

[RealDave]

Now the asswipe Reubicans like Trump take credit for Obama's successes.

Wow.

We had Bill Clinton who balanced the budget, along came Bush Jr, put in tax cuts & took us to the worst recession in 80 year.

Along comes Obama & fixes the mess Bush made & left the Republicans once again with a growing economy, lowering unemployment rates, a climbing stock market, a lowing deficit. Now comes the Republicabs getting another tax cut.

I guess you are too fucking stupid to see the pattern here.

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

If Obama would have run, Trump would ha e gotten slaughtered.

Clinton was hurt by all the investigations that had nothing to do with Obama.

You people are dumber than shit.

I have news, Trump is a proven business cheat, a proven fraud, a proven liar - no fake news - only your fake intelligence.

 

[Faun]

Now the asswipe Reubicans like Trump take credit for Obama's successes.

Wow.

We had Bill Clinton who balanced the budget, along came Bush Jr, put in tax cuts & took us to the worst recession in 80 year.

Along comes Obama & fixes the mess Bush made & left the Republicans once again with a growing economy, lowering unemployment rates, a climbing stock market, a lowing deficit. Now comes the Republicabs getting another tax cut.

I guess you are too fucking stupid to see the pattern here.

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

Imbecile.... look at how you have to switch your argument from how the people rejected Hillary to how she lost because of the electoral vote. That alone should clue you in as to just how retarded your position is. Sadly, you lack the ability to comprehend that.

 

[Roudy]

No. It does not. You are trying to extrapolate data from an off-year election to the midterms. All you have is assumptions and we all knew Hillary was going to win and the lib media told us for a year and a half that Trump could not win. Well, what happened?

You continue to deny reality. Trump will be the leader of the Republican Party. The fact is that the mid-terms are off-year as well since there will be no Presidential race. We do have data to look at and it does tell us something. Then you have Democrats picking up seats in the Philadelphia suburbs for the first time. The Republicans should be worried about the mid-terms especially if you have a bunch of flakes running.

Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.

Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.

Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.

This time we don;t have 4 years of Clinton investigations that were based on found nothing.

Now we have Trump investigations. Now people are well aware just how big an asshole Trump really is. Republicans will need to either embrace Trump & lose the traditional Republican vote or stay clear & lose the bigoted racist vote.

I have a hint, supporting Roy Moore isn't helping

Dems lost five out of five house seats so far and went giddy over winning a meaningless shoe-in governorship in a blue state. Now you know.

 

[Roudy]

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

Imbecile.... look at how you have to switch your argument from how the people rejected Hillary to how she lost because of the electoral vote. That alone should clue you in as to just how retarded your position is. Sadly, you lack the ability to comprehend that.

When all is lost they start with the personal insults and pretending that presidential elections in the US haven't been based on an electoral system for the last two hundred years.

 

[Roudy]

Yeah well Obama was so fucking good both domestically and internationally that his legacy was totally rejected last November 8 and states that had not voted red in decades did so in protest. Despite the media attacking Trump in an unprecedented way.

Now who's the delusional stupid one who refuses to face reality?

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

If Obama would have run, Trump would ha e gotten slaughtered.

Clinton was hurt by all the investigations that had nothing to do with Obama.

You people are dumber than shit.

I have news, Trump is a proven business cheat, a proven fraud, a proven liar - no fake news - only your fake intelligence.

Obama did campaign as if he was running, dumbass. That's because he knew his legacy was on the line.

And Clinton and Obama were proven to be crooked, corrupt, liars that rigged a nomination and then and election but failed. How pathetic is that?

 

[Faun]

And by "totally rejected," you mean the candidate for Obama's party got more votes than any other candidate and his party picked up seats in the House and Senate.

Meh, like I said the Dems had a good chance of gaining a lot of seats and they didn't fulfil the expectations.

Did you forget that under Obama's stewardship the Dems lost the House, Senate, record number of seats in both, governorships, state legislators, and left the Democratic Party totally broke until crooked Hillary used 20 million to take control of it and rig the nomination in her favor. Such a great Democratic Party leader Obama was. LOL

Shitstain.... you said he was rejected in the last election... how was he rejected when the Democrat candidate for president got more votes than any other candidate? Third highest in U.S. history; and Democrats increased their seats in the House and Senate?

So wait, you claim that it wasn't a rejection of Obama, when Hillary ran as his incumbent, Obama campaigned harder than Hillary herself - as if he was on the ticket, with the media jackals running anti Trump fake news 24/7, and despite all of this, states that had not voted red in decades did so, handing Trump a pretty significant electoral victory and therefore the presidency, BECAUSE OF OBAMA AND HILLARY.

But oh wait, Hillary won the popular vote and Miss Congeniality in the crooked witch contest. And that's all that counts...sniff sniff...

Imbecile.... look at how you have to switch your argument from how the people rejected Hillary to how she lost because of the electoral vote. That alone should clue you in as to just how retarded your position is. Sadly, you lack the ability to comprehend that.

When all is lost they start with the personal insults and pretending that presidential elections in the US haven't been based on an electoral system for the last two hundred years.

Calling you an 'imbecile' when you appear to be one is warranted and not at all a signal that "all is lost," ya whiney bitch.

And you weren't talking about the electoral system when you said Obama was rejected. The electoral system is the states electing the president; whereas it's people who reject candidates. And the people picked Hillary.

 

[FA_Q2]

Unbelievable, your a Trump fan and is proud of it...just another reason whites shouldn't be allowed to vote or be seen or heard....useless lumps of flesh

Coming from an unemployed niggerr mooching off the gov't. You want to talk about useless lump of flesh you should look in the mirror.

^^^ as so often seen here on the USMB, rightwing pricks just can’t contain their racism under the cloak of anonymity.

Um did you see the post I quoted? Tiggerred took it to the racist level, not me. I merely replied. That nigga brought up race first. I even highlighted it to dumb it down for you. But of course that's fine that nigga is racist. Because it's an Obama dick suckin' liberal.

But I don't expect someone as stupid as you to be able to actually read and comprehend.

Dumb mutha fucka. Why are people this stupid allowed to reproduce? You should have to prove your IQ is higher than the octane in your gas or your genitals are removed.

He didn't use a racial epithet, ya racist bitch -- you did. Stop making up silly excuses for why you get so easily triggered.

And you jumped right on the 'rightwing pricks' cant contain themselves while ignoring the left wing racist prick. Why does that not surprise me?

 

[Faun]

Unbelievable, your a Trump fan and is proud of it...just another reason whites shouldn't be allowed to vote or be seen or heard....useless lumps of flesh

Coming from an unemployed niggerr mooching off the gov't. You want to talk about useless lump of flesh you should look in the mirror.

^^^ as so often seen here on the USMB, rightwing pricks just can’t contain their racism under the cloak of anonymity.

Um did you see the post I quoted? Tiggerred took it to the racist level, not me. I merely replied. That nigga brought up race first. I even highlighted it to dumb it down for you. But of course that's fine that nigga is racist. Because it's an Obama dick suckin' liberal.

But I don't expect someone as stupid as you to be able to actually read and comprehend.

Dumb mutha fucka. Why are people this stupid allowed to reproduce? You should have to prove your IQ is higher than the octane in your gas or your genitals are removed.

He didn't use a racial epithet, ya racist bitch -- you did. Stop making up silly excuses for why you get so easily triggered.

And you jumped right on the 'rightwing pricks' cant contain themselves while ignoring the left wing racist prick. Why does that not surprise me?

WTF is that?

 

[francoHFW]

The way they Dems are behaving having won in a predominately blue state filled with government workers, you'd think they won the House, Senate and the Presidency last night.

They persist in lying to themselves in order to feel good about the Identity Politics system that now controls the party.

The Northrum ad against Gillespie that labels all his supporters as racists who want to mow down minority children with a truck is just way over the top and has been denounced all over the country.



But not for blue dog Virginian Democrats.

Democrats needed some justification for all their lies, corruption and demagoguery over the past year, and they found it by winning in a solid blue state? Ya gotta love it.

No actual lies or corruption, Dupe, just GOP bulshit for the dupes...