WSJ- Obamacare, How Low Can They Go?

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
May 31, 2009
22,873
4,295
290
Tennessee
Best of the Web Today: How Low Can They Go? - WSJ.com

It's been just over a month since ObamaCare's disastrous launch, and it's just over three years until the scheduled election of Barack Obama's successor. It's going to be a long three years. The exposure of Obama's signature "achievement" as both incompetent and fraudulent (with its economic inviability yet to be realized) is also showing the administration's true face. It is an ugly one, and we can expect to see a lot more of it while Obama remains in office.

This morning the White House went on the attack against a cancer patient who is also a victim of ObamaCare. Edie Littlefield Sundby of San Diego explains in today's Wall Street Journal that she's been managing a case of stage 4 gallbladder cancer, an affliction whose five-year survival rate is just 2%. Having survived the diagnosis by seven years so far, she beat very long odds--and she did so with the help of an excellent insurance plan that covered care at three hospitals, two in California and one in Texas.

In touting ObamaCare, Obama asserted at least two dozen times (in slightly varying language) that if you like your health plan, you can keep it. As Sundby explains, she is a victim of Obama's fraudulent sales pitch:

Since March 2007 United Healthcare has paid $1.2 million to help keep me alive, and it has never once questioned any treatment or procedure recommended by my medical team. The company pays a fair price to the doctors and hospitals, on time, and is responsive to the emergency treatment requirements of late-stage cancer. Its caring people in the claims office have been readily available to talk to me and my providers.
But in January, United Healthcare sent me a letter announcing that they were pulling out of the individual California market. The company suggested I look to Covered California starting in October.
Covered California is the state ObamaCare exchange, one of those that, unlike the administration-built federal one, has some degree of technical functionality. Thus Sundby was able to log in and check out her options, which--contrary to Obama's "new and improved" sales pitch, that people whose policies are canceled will get better insurance--were unsatisfactory. No plan available to her would cover both her primary-care doctor at the University of California, San Diego, and her oncologist at Stanford.

Sundby asks: "What happened to the president's promise, 'You can keep your health plan'? Or to the promise that 'You can keep your doctor'? Thanks to the law, I have been forced to give up a world-class health plan. The exchange would force me to give up a world-class physician."

Read more at http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303482504579177811453111326
 
Last edited:

And looming Obamacare mandates had nothing to do with the 'business' decision?

And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving. “The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. “UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”
 

And looming Obamacare mandates had nothing to do with the 'business' decision?

And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving. “The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. “UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”

You must not have read everything in the article.


More information for you to try to understand:

http://people.howstuffworks.com/why-pursue-health-reform1.htm
 

And looming Obamacare mandates had nothing to do with the 'business' decision?

And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving. “The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. “UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”

You must not have read everything in the article.


More information for you to try to understand:

HowStuffWorks "How U.S. Health Care Costs Compare to Other Countries"

I read it. It was a business decision based on economics.

Totally acceptable

-Geaux
 
Yup. A business decision based on economics. As will be the decision to go to a Universal Single Payer System, a decision that will be made by the American Citizens that vote.

You see, what all to many of us are seeing in this is that halfway measures just don't make the grade.
 
Read my lips..."If you like your plan you can keep it, period!"

I just wonder what's going on in the minds today of good hardworking Democrats - the makers of the party, not the takers - who voted for this lying bastard. Nobody likes being duped, let alone outright lied to. And then yesterday Barry doubled down and lied again about what he'd originally said.

I gotta admit the guy's got huge balls though.
 

And looming Obamacare mandates had nothing to do with the 'business' decision?

And then there is the company’s own justification for leaving. “The company’s plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest,” UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. “UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have ‘a pent-up appetite’ for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that.”

You must not have read everything in the article.


More information for you to try to understand:

HowStuffWorks "How U.S. Health Care Costs Compare to Other Countries"

here, maybe you can understand this;

"That means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what." – President Obama, speech to the American Medical Association, June 15, 2009, during the debate over health insurance reform.
 
Yup. A business decision based on economics. As will be the decision to go to a Universal Single Payer System, a decision that will be made by the American Citizens that vote.

You see, what all to many of us are seeing in this is that halfway measures just don't make the grade.

rofl2.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top