washamericom
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2010
- 13,703
- 1,908
- 245
- Banned
- #1,221
who made you the hall monitor ??hey mg1... he went outside i guess (the ringo guy).It's easy to find the answers, make an appointment with a psycho-therapist.
Oh, I see. Obviously, your mind is closed on the issue, and you clearly have done no serious reading on the subject and have no intention of doing so.
When you want to at least read the other side and attempt to explain the evidence, let me know.
but maybe you can comment on this. the obots point right to the one citizen parent is enough. where does that come from... de vattel ? they say the "two parent" theory is contrived. well where is one parent's "settled law" or natural born defined. and what about having one parent ? doesn't that leave one foreign parent, with a foot in another kingdom ??
No citizen parents is enough if you're born inside the US. As natural born status follows place of birth. Even if the child had two alien parents.
See Wong Kim Ark and the USSC's discussion of natural born status. Specifically, their citation of English Common law as the lens through which this issue should be viewed. And cited place of birth as defining natural born status per English Common law.
Vattel is irrelevant. As The Law of Nations didn't even include the word 'natural born' until the 1790s, after the constitution was written. Making the Law of Nations an impossible source for the meaning of a term that it didn't use nor define.
You'll need a blue police box to make that argument work. Or a flux capacitor.
Timeline of drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Which has nothing to do with anything we're discussing.
Try again. This time addressing the issues involved.