NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
[QU
Did you read the manifesto? No you didn't. That is all fluff talk, besides "common ownership" is impossible in a stateless society. That is why the "anarcho-communist" view is absolutely hilariously contradictory.
Here is one of the historical moments of communism: 100 million dead.
And hjere is the actual manifesto, if someone wants to read the horrors of what communism is about. And yes, the basket case communist countries have every right to call themselves communist based on this. (Maybe with the exception of China, which is nowadays one party dictatorship, and has abandoned the communist vision).
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
Pure capitalism is simply not comparable to communism. Free individuals in the absence of coercion achieve amazing things, and very productive countries. This is a fact.
Actually it doesn't back up your point of view. The ideals of communism was a reaction to 1 percent of the population owning 99 percent of the wealth (sound familiar), with that 1 percent not willing to play nice. That is what happens when greedy people throw 99 percent of the rest to the wolves. Thus pure capitalism doesn't work..
Dude, the communist manifesto is laid right there in front of you. Please present to me right now where it lays out a realistic plan to build a "society for the people", instead of one of coercion. The ideals of a communism was born of a man who was possibly in the 1 %, and didn't work a day in his life. This guy is the definition of 1 %er not playing nice. Not very surprisingly, In communism what happens is that if you don't agree with the 1 %, you are put to death.
Speaking of that, what do you mean by the 1 % not willing to play nice? Not giving people all your earnings is not playing nice? Do you yourself donate all your wealth? Sorry, but it's clear that you have received the Marxist indoctrination. No one sane in this age becomes a commie apologist unless indoctrinated.
No, very pure capitalism actually does work. What you have there is bunch of imaginary made up tales. Singapore is doing extremely nicely (and there are no wolf problems there that I am aware of). And no it's not completely "pure" capitalism, nothing completely pure actually exists, so you can forget that lane of defense right there.
Pure capitalism requires allowing the capitalists command of what does or doesn't go on.
That never works.