jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 140,757
- 29,780
- 2,180
it was authorization. it's all he wanted and got. They approved his actions.You still don't understand the conditions of the authorization. Sucks to be you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it was authorization. it's all he wanted and got. They approved his actions.You still don't understand the conditions of the authorization. Sucks to be you.
it was authorization. it's all he wanted and got. They approved his actions.
well you don't even know authorization.Based on conditions you don't understand. Sucks to be you.
well you don't even know authorization.
Todd, your defense of tax cuts and deregulation as a benefit to the working class is completely detached from reality.
The middle class do very well every time taxes and regulations are cut.
the most job security, occurred when union membership was at its peak and the wealthiest Americans were paying tax rates as high as 91%.
Yeah, life was easy when we were the only economy not bombed into rubble.
Supply-side economics has done nothing but concentrate wealth at the top
How?
If you’re unwilling to consider a marketless socialist economy, then at least acknowledge that Keynesian economics, focused on demand-side solutions, has a proven track record of building a stronger and more equitable economy.
Who uses Keynesian economics today? How do they implement it?
I simply state historical facts, you just resort to insults and nonsense.I followed your lead. You presented no data to support your argument. I asked for it. And you failed again.
oh, and sometimes a lie is too obvious to ignore. Now, can you show data or not?
I thanked you for proving my point. Again, thanks. Congress approved Bush's Iraq strategy like I said.Now you look even dumber as I was the one who posted the authorization and explained it to you.
what facts? see facts are data. And so far, you have only presented headlines of word salad. I'm waiting for the data that proves your headlines.I simply state historical facts, you just resort to insults and nonsense.
While a small tax cut might seem beneficial at first glance, it doesn't amount to much when other expenses are skyrocketing. Under Trump's administration, funding cuts to vital programs disproportionately hurt the working class. For example, Trump's tax cuts primarily benefited the wealthy and corporations, while simultaneously leading to proposals for cuts in programs like Medicaid, food assistance, and housing subsidies, programs that millions of working-class Americans rely on to make ends meet.The so-called "tax-cuts" did nothing for the average worker.
The average worker paid less tax.
It did much more for the rich and powerful
It's true, people who paid more saved more from the tax cut. And?
What "headlines" are you referring to? Be specific.what facts? see facts are data. And so far, you have only presented headlines of word salad. I'm waiting for the data that proves your headlines.
Presenting a counter point to your vague adage which had little(no?) example presented.So it's not popular, it just seems to be, and it's not workable? What exactly are you referring to? Go ahead.
your postsWhat "headlines" are you referring to? Be specific.
yep, approved!!!, thanks.They approved of Bush determining if war was necessary.
In market socialism, you don't use other people's money, especially when your country has a sovereign currency and a robust GDP. You obviously don't know where the money comes from. Your so-called "debt clock" is a myth and a paper tiger. The US government doesn't have a debt, as you or I have as mere users of the currency. That "debt" can just as well be identified as the "People's surplus". The government's red ink is the people's black ink, or surplus.Presenting a counter point to your vague adage which had little(no?) example presented.
But socialism is one key example. As shown by the references to the Debt Clock list of some of the world's nations and their debt load.
Margaret Thatcher once said that "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher on Socialism
What talking points are you claiming that I didn't provide evidence for, be specific.your posts
I thanked you for proving my point. Again, thanks. Congress approved Bush's Iraq strategy like I said.
he doesn't do math?The so-called "tax-cuts" did nothing for the average worker.
The average worker paid less tax.
It did much more for the rich and powerful
It's true, people who paid more saved more from the tax cut. And?
Presenting a counter point to your vague adage which had little(no?) example presented.
But socialism is one key example. As shown by the references to the Debt Clock list of some of the world's nations and their debt load.
Margaret Thatcher once said that "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher on Socialism
Tell that to your Democrats. They imposed lockdowns on most of society, deleting so many jobs. Then, When those jobs returned after Democrats lockdowns were proven wrong… the Democrats include the returning jobs in their “jobs created” statcreating
- bring (something) into existence that was not there before
name something that went up in expense. Gas dropped to 1.80 a gallon. Is that not good for middle class? Or in your math is 5.00 a gallon better?While a small tax cut might seem beneficial at first glance, it doesn't amount to much when other expenses are skyrocketing.
another headline without dataUnder Trump's administration, funding cuts to vital programs disproportionately hurt the working class.
Headline without evidence.For example, Trump's tax cuts primarily benefited the wealthy and corporations, while simultaneously leading to proposals for cuts in programs like Medicaid, food assistance, and housing subsidies, programs that millions of working-class Americans rely on to make ends meet.
why hasn't biden and harris stopped it?Moreover, the cost of living has continued to rise,
yeah, medicare is being denied at hospitals now, under joe.with healthcare being one of the most significant burdens.
did he?Trump's attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act would have left millions without medical insurance, pushing healthcare costs even higher for those who could least afford it.
another headline minus evidence to support it. your newspaper isn't interesting at all.When wages are stagnant and the safety net is being slashed, any tax savings are quickly overshadowed by the increasing costs of essentials like healthcare, housing, and education. In the end, the working class ends up paying more overall, while the wealthiest Americans continue to see their fortunes grow.