You want to ban guns but

[rightwinger]

Bartenders are not liable. Good try lol.

Go ahead and try and sue a gun manufacturer that has NO INTERACTION with the end user. Dumb ass

Yes, Bartenders are liable for serving drunks and the underage

 

[rightwinger]

Gun manufacturers can't be sued for misuse of the product they made.

Tell it to Remington

 

[ThomasSowellsFro]

It's all about cost and benefit. Banning cars isn't feasible and most people need a car. Virtually no one needs a gun.

 

[Sunsettommy]

32 people are killed daily by a drunk driver. Less people are killed with a rifle.

CNS News

By Kharen Martinez Murcia | October 8, 2019

Excerpt:

(CNSNews.com) – The 2018 homicide data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shows that more people were murdered with knives (1,515) and “blunt objects” such as hammers (443) than with rifles (297). The numbers also show that fewer people were killed with shotguns (235) than with knives or blunt objects.

LINK

===

Over 10,000/year people die from drunk drivers while about 630 total died from Shot guns and rifles combined.

LOL

 

[DarthTrader]

Yes, Bartenders are liable for serving drunks and the underage

Not really - highly subjective.

And as I said, Gun manufacturers DO NOT INTERACT with their end users.

Can you tell if someone is "drunk" if you sold them a bottle of wine and shipped it across country? Fuck off moron

 

[Sunsettommy]

It's all about cost and benefit. Banning cars isn't feasible and most people need a car. Virtually no one needs a gun.

There are hundreds of thousand self-defense gun incidents every year.

 

[rightwinger]

Can you tell if someone is "drunk" if you sold them a bottle of wine and shipped it across country? Fuck off moron

No, but a bartender can tell if someone sitting in front of them is drunk and they have already served him six drinks

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

nobody i know of, dupes...Huge majority wants background checks and ban of future sales of military style weapons....Cut the stupid brainwashed bs...

I can't go to my local gun store and buy a military weapon. The ones that are legal to purchase are horrifyingly expensive and where manufactured before 1986. I've seen M-16 priced at over 30,000.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Gun manufacturers can't be sued for misuse of the product they made.

They are sued for MAKING guns that gets used in murders.

 

[MisterBeale]

federal supremacists are never consistent. Lying is their MO.
NEVER listen to a federal supremacist.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You don't want to ban cars.
Everyday 32 people are killed by a drunk driver that's more than someone killed with an assault weapon. You want to blame the driver but not the car. Where as you want to blame the gun but not the shooter.

Drunk Driving | NHTSA

Get resources on ways to prevent drunk driving and alcohol-impaired crashes along with national drunk driving statistics and facts.

www.nhtsa.gov

Stop Rape

Ban Dicks

 

[DarthTrader]

They are sued for MAKING guns that gets used in murders.

They aren't liable

 

[Flash]

Old story.

Bartenders are liable. Next it's gun manufacturers. Remington comes to mind.

Gun manufactures don't pull triggers. Mostly Negroes in Democrat controlled big city shitholes pull the triggers in crime.

Remington was going bankrupt because they were not putting out the product lines for high sales.

 

[MisterBeale]

Damn. Federal supremacists get all angry when you point out their hypocrisy.
Love it

At this point in history? IMO?

"Federal supremacists," whether they know it or not. . . seem to me, to be useful idiots for an amorphous global agenda. The synchronization now, with all other national governments on Earth, in their ideas, and POV, with all the other oligarchs, and with every other bureaucracy on the planet, to line up federal policy, is absolutely frightening.

They no longer are "federal supremacists," they are "international supremacists."

They never seem to disagree with the international foreign posters on this forum on any issue. And like those posters? They too are hypocrites.

 

[Sunsettommy]

They aren't liable

Are you sure?

Sandy Hook lawsuit: Gun manufacturer Remington reaches settlement with victims' families​

and,

Judge Rejects Challenge to New York Law Allowing Lawsuits Against Gun Industry​

===

They are sued over guns being used in murders not a product liability case at all..

​

 

[Yarddog]

They are sued for MAKING guns that gets used in murders.

If they are, thats a bad lawsuit. Its fucking retarded. Guns are made to fire a projectile out of the end. If congress has not passed a law saying that type of gun cannot be manufactured, then sue congress. It makes more sense than suing a manufacturer of something legal.

 

[rightwinger]

Gun manufactures don't pull triggers. Mostly Negroes in Democrat controlled big city shitholes pull the triggers in crime.

Remington was going bankrupt because they were not putting out the product lines for high sales.

You sound like the Buffalo shooter

 

[Yarddog]

Are you sure?

Sandy Hook lawsuit: Gun manufacturer Remington reaches settlement with victims' families​

and,

Judge Rejects Challenge to New York Law Allowing Lawsuits Against Gun Industry​

===

They are sued over guns being used in murders not a product liability case at all..

​

Makes more sense to sue the gun shop, IF the seller had some idea the person who bought the weapon seemed unstable.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Makes more sense to sue the gun shop, IF the seller had some idea the person who bought the weapon seemed unstable.

If they PASS the required background check the liability is transferred to the buyer.

 

[occupied]

If cars were like guns you could be as irresponsible as you like until someone gets hurt.