Deplorable Yankee
Diamond Member
- Feb 7, 2019
- 16,965
- 16,061
You'd have to ask youtube. Fox news hosts, distributes, produces, and in even some cases commisssions material. Should they be forced to host content they don't approve of?\Nope. North Korea tightly controls all information. The US allows freedom of information. Just because a non government website in the US chooses to block vile content doesnt make it "like North Korea". It's a dumbass argument. Should fox news be forced to allow stalinist propaganda on its website? Yes or no?Very Orwellian. Sounds like shit North Korea and Iran would do.Quotes:
"YouTube announced new rules around hate speech on Wednesday that prohibit videos promoting Nazi ideology or denying the existence of the Holocaust or other well-documented violent events like the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Thousands of channels are expected to be shut down. But now multiple teachers are complaining that videos uploaded to educate people about Nazi history have been deleted, the Guardian reported."
"Scott Allsop, who owns the longrunning MrAllsopHistory revision website and teaches at an international school in Romania, had his channel featuring hundreds of historical clips on topics ranging from the Norman conquest to the cold war deleted for breaching the rules that ban hate speech."
"Richard Jones-Nerzic, another British teacher affected by the crackdown, suggested YouTube’s policy did not take into account the extent to which the history syllabus focused on the second world war.
“Modern world study and Hitler in particular have dominated the history curriculum in the UK over the last 25 years,” he said, explaining that he had been censured for uploading clips to his channel from old documentaries about the rise of nazism."
YouTube is deleting videos on Nazi history as part of its hate speech crackdown
YouTube blocks history teachers uploading archive videos of Hitler
This is what happens when you start dictating who is allowed to speak and what they are allowed to speak about - erasure of history and ensuring that the bloody cycle of freedom --> bondage happens AGAIN. Thank your local leftist snowflake.
How is a history teachers vids that was being used by other teachers VILE ?Finally Christan bakers dont have to bake vile gay cakes if they dont want to? . Thanks for that
Who is defining what is and isnt vile ? We already know the answer to that question .
So are they a tech company or now a publisher since they're controlling content ?
Technology company? Publisher? The lines can no longer be blurred | Emily Bell
Sir Martin Sorrell, chairman of the world’s largest advertising agency, WPP, put it like this: “We have always said Google, Facebook and others are media companies and have the same responsibilities as any other media company ... They cannot masquerade as technology companies, particularly when they place advertisements.”
It could equally be argued that they are not “masquerading” as technology companies. They are, after all, stuffed to the primary-coloured rafters with the world’s finest technologists, and they do really believe themselves to be “technology” companies. But it’s hard to deny that they are also publishers. Social platforms including Google, Facebook, Snapchat and Twitter monetise, host, distribute, produce and even in some cases commission material.
why fox news? why not throw in cnn to ? CNN has a YUGE credibility problem and not with the right .
This is vile to a brainwashed lefttard with TDS
who decides what is vile ?
gay wedding cakes are vile
See i just decided
Again ill ask ya what makes a history teachers non offensive historical videos vile? and who decided it was vile?
Youre vile Authoritarian RACIST nazi morons thats without a doubt
The road to Utopia eh comrades