I have been a gun owner since the age of 12. And on occasion, I have packed a concealed weopon. The first thing I was taught concerning guns, is that when you are carrying one, you are responsible for what happens with that gun. You can defend yourself, but if you initiate the conflict, then use your gun, you are in the wrong.
Now, given the fact that the kid was doing absolutely nothing wrong, that Zimmerman's state of mind is evident from his statements on the calls he made to the police, and his BS story concerning the fight, if charges are not brought, we have a clear miscarriage of justice. No marks in the police video taken 40 minutes after the crime, and now a voice identification that says that Zimmerman's story that he was the one crying for help is just more BS. At this point, I think Zimmerman is guilty of murder one.
If in fact Martin was not doing "anything wrong" that does not give him the right to assault Zimmerman for ASKING him what he's doing.
Initiating "contact" in the form of questioning someone does not make someone responsible for every violent thing that happens following that contact. I don't know the circumstances anymore than anyone else here but if Martin did become angry over being questioned by Zimmerman and physically confronted him because of it then Martin is no longer an "innocent" party in this. As for murder one? You don't even understand what goes into determining murder counts...do you?