- Thread starter
- #161
Facts are Martin attacked Zimmerman physically first.
Look at his face.My mind is not made up. I would consider all options.
But look at his face. Take a good look. Trayvon Martin attacked him.
What does that mean to you?
So you are claiming the police doctored the first photo?
You are biased and your mind is made up.
The case has not gone to trial and in your low information mind Zimmerman is guilty.
You remind me of the old south where blacks were convicted before they got to court.
You are doing the exact same thing. A low information citizen that gets their "facts" from TV.
Gadawg aren't you doing the same thing that you accuse Paperview of?
Your previous statements show that you've made up your mind that Martin attacked Zimmerman when in fact there is no evidence that supports that except for Zimmerman's statements as the guy that shot Martin.
And no, a bloody nose does not indicate who threw the first punch. ALL IT SHOWS is that Martin landed at least one good punch to Zimmerman's face. Whether that was the "first" punch or occurred later (say after Zimmerman may have grabbed Martin) there has not been any definitive proof presented yet.
As a matter of record though, for all of Zimmerman's claims that Marin punched Zimmerman repeatedly and grabbed his head to smash it into the ground, there was none of Zimmerman's DNA on Martins hands and Martin's hands had no offensive injuries (except for one small scrape on one finger on one hand) but no scrapped knuckles expected from the type of beating Zimmerman claims.
>>>>
Martin had NO attack marks on his face.
Did he hit Zimmerman in the face after he was shot?
Not what the autopsy report findings are.
Eye witness testimony with Martin on Zimmerman hitting him in the face.
All the physical evidence at the scene indicated that and the police ruled it self defense and did not charge him.
Do not buy into a conspiracy whitey versus darkey cover up that the media hysteria manufactured and the naive and gullible masses have bought into.
I am not biased at all. Will hear testimony on manslaughter charges but please show me how this is a murder in any way. No intent to kill except when attacked. Now if there is an eye witness that says Zimmerman was on top of Martin and Z attacked him first then I would hear the murder charges and consider that.
But none of the physical evidence supports any of that.
Amazing you dispute this clear photo and add credibility that it is faked some how.
No DNA evidence has been introduced as evidence yet. And the DNA evidence that was released, respectfully and I mean you no disrespect was from THE GUN ONLY.
The additional DNA results were that BOTH of them had each others DNA on them. Florida State Crime Lab results 9/19/12 as part of the state's discovery to defense counsel.
That is the record, not what you are claiming.
So you are claiming that Zimmerman beat his face in before police arrived and no one saw him do that.