$12,400.00 For A Fuckin' Jacket

This goes hand and hand with her $12K jacket and talking about INEQUALITY...

83mwFoU.jpg
show me the puke that has no fence
 
Well her father was a member of the Communist Party...

Actually I thought she was a gold digger but a lot people say she is bright and articulate...

But if the RW want to gt into what Hillary is wearing Clinton has a simple answer.

'While I want to support the Middle class, ME security and Education standards, they want to discuss fashion tips!!!'

So please continue this thread.

I think it's imperative that our President and First Lady -- and all of the people in public life -- look their absolute best.

Hillary, left to her own devices, is a mess. Very typical of a leftist college student from the 60s. Look at her appearance when SOS -- the lank hair, the sloppy, cheap clothes.

As I said, I think the Armani jacket was good but she's a hypocrite for wearing it for her income inequality speech.

There are lots and lots of levels below that that would look appropriate but aren't screamingly hypocritical.

But as a slob, she wouldn't know.

Hillary's views on income inequality are that the wealthy (including herself) should pay more taxes
Wages need to be increased
We need to do more for education and healthcare

None of which say you can't wear an Armani suit


Why did Jackie have to patronize American designers and even Michelle Obama does, but Hillary gets a pass?

She can have the Italian.

I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart
 
They stink. The bulk of job growth under Obama has been low pay retail and service jobs, and most of those going to the invaders.

Manufacturing got shipped overseas before he took office, actually starting when Reagan was in office. So maybe if he was the dictator that everyone says he is, he'd impose a huge tax on American companies who have factories offshore.

Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?

There is no both ways, there has been a recovery, it's an all time record slow one. You didn't contradict any of that
 
Manufacturing got shipped overseas before he took office, actually starting when Reagan was in office. So maybe if he was the dictator that everyone says he is, he'd impose a huge tax on American companies who have factories offshore.

Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?

There is no both ways, there has been a recovery, it's an all time record slow one. You didn't contradict any of that
I can't... It has been slow BUT can you at least admit it was if not the greatest recession ever it was one of the worst??
 
They stink. The bulk of job growth under Obama has been low pay retail and service jobs, and most of those going to the invaders.

Manufacturing got shipped overseas before he took office, actually starting when Reagan was in office. So maybe if he was the dictator that everyone says he is, he'd impose a huge tax on American companies who have factories offshore.

Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?
Those job gains were illegal aliens getting the jobs of citizens who lost their jobs.
 
I think it's imperative that our President and First Lady -- and all of the people in public life -- look their absolute best.

Hillary, left to her own devices, is a mess. Very typical of a leftist college student from the 60s. Look at her appearance when SOS -- the lank hair, the sloppy, cheap clothes.

As I said, I think the Armani jacket was good but she's a hypocrite for wearing it for her income inequality speech.

There are lots and lots of levels below that that would look appropriate but aren't screamingly hypocritical.

But as a slob, she wouldn't know.

Hillary's views on income inequality are that the wealthy (including herself) should pay more taxes
Wages need to be increased
We need to do more for education and healthcare

None of which say you can't wear an Armani suit


Why did Jackie have to patronize American designers and even Michelle Obama does, but Hillary gets a pass?

She can have the Italian.

I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's relevant.
She's a millioniare for one . How much do you think trumps suits cost?

Plus, I bet it was given to her.

The difference is, Trump earned his money.

Bill Clinton rose from poverty, Hillary was middle class
Trump was born on third base and acts like he hit a triple

True. Isn't it interesting how the Clintons became so wealthy after the White House?

A job that paid $200,000 per year at that time...

Nothing like forming a dummy foundation to wash illegal contributions from terrorist-supporting governments.

Yes, you're right, the Clintons did make it for themselves.

The difference is, Trump did it the LEGAL way.:wink_2:
 
Manufacturing got shipped overseas before he took office, actually starting when Reagan was in office. So maybe if he was the dictator that everyone says he is, he'd impose a huge tax on American companies who have factories offshore.

Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?
Those job gains were illegal aliens getting the jobs of citizens who lost their jobs.
Of course not..

But if the rightwing Echo chamber tells you so, you gotta believe it
 
Hillary's views on income inequality are that the wealthy (including herself) should pay more taxes
Wages need to be increased
We need to do more for education and healthcare

None of which say you can't wear an Armani suit


Why did Jackie have to patronize American designers and even Michelle Obama does, but Hillary gets a pass?

She can have the Italian.

I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's relevant.
She's a millioniare for one . How much do you think trumps suits cost?

Plus, I bet it was given to her.

The difference is, Trump earned his money.

Bill Clinton rose from poverty, Hillary was middle class
Trump was born on third base and acts like he hit a triple

True. Isn't it interesting how the Clintons became so wealthy after the White House?

A job that paid $200,000 per year at that time...

Nothing like forming a dummy foundation to wash illegal contributions from terrorist-supporting governments.

Yes, you're right, the Clintons did make it for themselves.

The difference is, Trump did it the LEGAL way.:wink_2:
That is politics today
AFTER you leave office, the public clammors for books, public appearances ....you become a political Rock Star

Trump whores his name for profit
 
Why did Jackie have to patronize American designers and even Michelle Obama does, but Hillary gets a pass?

She can have the Italian.

I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's relevant.
She's a millioniare for one . How much do you think trumps suits cost?

Plus, I bet it was given to her.

The difference is, Trump earned his money.

Bill Clinton rose from poverty, Hillary was middle class
Trump was born on third base and acts like he hit a triple

True. Isn't it interesting how the Clintons became so wealthy after the White House?

A job that paid $200,000 per year at that time...

Nothing like forming a dummy foundation to wash illegal contributions from terrorist-supporting governments.

Yes, you're right, the Clintons did make it for themselves.

The difference is, Trump did it the LEGAL way.:wink_2:
That is politics today
AFTER you leave office, the public clammors for books, public appearances ....you become a political Rock Star

Trump whores his name for profit

Keep telling yourself that.

For the sake of the Democratic Party, America had better believe that too.

Because if they know the truth, she's already finished.
 
Manufacturing got shipped overseas before he took office, actually starting when Reagan was in office. So maybe if he was the dictator that everyone says he is, he'd impose a huge tax on American companies who have factories offshore.

Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?
Those job gains were illegal aliens getting the jobs of citizens who lost their jobs.
I don't give a shit if they were the fn walking dead SOMEBODY needed them
 
Indeed, but he and the Democrats have made America so business unfriendly that small business start-ups are completely stifled, and destroyed any chance of any manufacturing return.
But IF they're so stifled why are they doing all that hiring ?? 74 months straight of big job gains??

Not "big," Skippy. This was the weakest recession recovery in the industrial age and Obama will be the first President in history without 3% GDP growth any year of his Presidency. But don't let the facts get in your way
You can't have it both ways kaz billy If we've had 74 straight months of 200 thousand+ job gains they must be going somewhere if not big good paying jobs then to small businesses and if small businesses need them isn't that a feather in obamas cap ? or are you going to bash him for everything good and bad?
Those job gains were illegal aliens getting the jobs of citizens who lost their jobs.
I don't give a shit if they were the fn walking dead SOMEBODY needed them
And was that dump again hiring illegals??
 
I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's relevant.
She's a millioniare for one . How much do you think trumps suits cost?

Plus, I bet it was given to her.

The difference is, Trump earned his money.

Bill Clinton rose from poverty, Hillary was middle class
Trump was born on third base and acts like he hit a triple

True. Isn't it interesting how the Clintons became so wealthy after the White House?

A job that paid $200,000 per year at that time...

Nothing like forming a dummy foundation to wash illegal contributions from terrorist-supporting governments.

Yes, you're right, the Clintons did make it for themselves.

The difference is, Trump did it the LEGAL way.:wink_2:
That is politics today
AFTER you leave office, the public clammors for books, public appearances ....you become a political Rock Star

Trump whores his name for profit

Keep telling yourself that.

For the sake of the Democratic Party, America had better believe that too.

Because if they know the truth, she's already finished.

If you think the Clinton's made a fortune from those wanting to hear them speak and publish. Wait till you see Obama

The only outlier is W Bush who left office in disgrace
 
I think it's imperative that our President and First Lady -- and all of the people in public life -- look their absolute best.

Hillary, left to her own devices, is a mess. Very typical of a leftist college student from the 60s. Look at her appearance when SOS -- the lank hair, the sloppy, cheap clothes.

As I said, I think the Armani jacket was good but she's a hypocrite for wearing it for her income inequality speech.

There are lots and lots of levels below that that would look appropriate but aren't screamingly hypocritical.

But as a slob, she wouldn't know.

Hillary's views on income inequality are that the wealthy (including herself) should pay more taxes
Wages need to be increased
We need to do more for education and healthcare

None of which say you can't wear an Armani suit


Why did Jackie have to patronize American designers and even Michelle Obama does, but Hillary gets a pass?

She can have the Italian.

I seem to remember Jackie patronizing French and Italian designers...Michelle too

Laura Bush patronized K Mart

Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's just partisan all the way. No one looks like K Mart in a de la Renta.

firstladies2.jpeg
 
Oscar de la Renta is K Mart to you?
Hate to say it....but on Laura Bush, Oscar de la Renta looks like K Mart

That's relevant.
The difference is, Trump earned his money.

Bill Clinton rose from poverty, Hillary was middle class
Trump was born on third base and acts like he hit a triple

True. Isn't it interesting how the Clintons became so wealthy after the White House?

A job that paid $200,000 per year at that time...

Nothing like forming a dummy foundation to wash illegal contributions from terrorist-supporting governments.

Yes, you're right, the Clintons did make it for themselves.

The difference is, Trump did it the LEGAL way.:wink_2:
That is politics today
AFTER you leave office, the public clammors for books, public appearances ....you become a political Rock Star

Trump whores his name for profit

Keep telling yourself that.

For the sake of the Democratic Party, America had better believe that too.

Because if they know the truth, she's already finished.

If you think the Clinton's made a fortune from those wanting to hear them speak and publish. Wait till you see Obama

The only outlier is W Bush who left office in disgrace

I agree with you there also.

Every gay, Muslim, socialist, and anti-American group in the world will be clamoring for their poster boy to speak for them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top