13 Year Old Forced To Give Birth After Being Raped

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the most stark difference in the two parties. Anyone who thinks there is no difference should have to consider this case.

One party wants children to be murdered in cold blood, and those who aren't murdered, to be abused by various fucked-up sorts of sexual perverts.

The other party wants to protect children from these.

And bizarrely, you think that being aligned with the former party gives you any moral high ground from which to look down on the latter.
 
You absolutely have. That girl is now a single mother, one of the main targets of vicious conservative hatred since the days of Reagan. You force a child into birth, and now the only thing you'll give a shit about is preventing any aid from ever reaching her.
I'm concerned about finding the rapist.
 
12 year old girl whose mother never told her where babies come from. Never heard from other kids where babies come from. The school has no sex ed program. Never seen a pregnant woman in her life. Mother never discussed birth control. Never thought of the pill.

Virgin girl is raped. She doesn't scream, doesn't go home crying with bloody clothes. Mother never even notices blood on her underwear.

Early abortion is available as is Plan B. But. See the 12 year old girl is protecting someone.

13 year old girl gives birth but the family elects to keep the child. They could have given it up for adoption but they kept it. No doubt the baby will add to the family's bottom line financially. It seems peculiar that a 13 year old would have a baby in a hospital then be immediately sent home. That's for another day.

This is one of those cases that just stinks. It screams that baby daddy is the 15 year old football player. Maybe they can get child support some day. Until then, it's Uncle Sugar.
 
Eric Clapton and Jack Nicholson were raised by their grandparents and were told their single moms were their sisters. They seem to have done pretty well.
 
Again, if anyone still thinks there is no difference between the two parties...take a look at this case.

Not only the bizarrely cruel legislation that was passed by republicans but examine closely the ideology of those who are fully giddy about a 13 year old rape victim having to carry the rapists child to term. 15 years from now when the rapist is out of prison...he can get visitation rights and go see both his offspring and the victim. I'm sure the conservatives will see nothing wrong with that either.
 
Again, if anyone still thinks there is no difference between the two parties...take a look at this case.

Not only the bizarrely cruel legislation that was passed by republicans but examine closely the ideology of those who are fully giddy about a 13 year old rape victim having to carry the rapists child to term. 15 years from now when the rapist is out of prison...he can get visitation rights and go see both his offspring and the victim. I'm sure the conservatives will see nothing wrong with that either.
It's not our business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top