- Jan 19, 2010
- 70,578
- 66,174
It is until we hear why she was prescribed that medicine and if its approved for her condition or if this is just another Left wing pro abortion Doctor trying to make a sick point.....Except that it's not fake news...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is until we hear why she was prescribed that medicine and if its approved for her condition or if this is just another Left wing pro abortion Doctor trying to make a sick point.....Except that it's not fake news...
The propped up puppet? Naw, he’s an empty tool, a buffoon of a tool but can somewhat read the cue cards he’s given and rushed off the stage when he starts muttering unprompted senseless spewings. Lol sure- the “leader”Damn that Biden!
I didn't hear you complain when your fellow pro-abort DemoKKKrats needed to know everyone's vaccination status.
Oh that's right.....your MAGAt-GOP politicians know way more than Doctors do.Is it a proven treatment for her condition?... because if it's not they can't give it to her untested....
It is until we hear why she was prescribed that medicine and if its approved for her condition or if this is just another Left wing pro abortion Doctor trying to make a sick point.....
This wasn't an issue at all until the fascist MAGAt-GOP passed that law.I’m pretty sure that one uneducated Walgreen’s pharmacist is not evidence of a “Christian military”… but you know this.
Wow.
The girl has arthritis. She was prescribed an arthritis medication. Should she have been prescribed, perhaps, cough medicine?
Why do you want young girls to suffer?
There is treatment for Rheumatoid arthritis... and its not the abortion pill....Wow.
The girl has arthritis. She was prescribed an arthritis medication. Should she have been prescribed, perhaps, cough medicine?
Why do you want young girls to suffer?
I believe that’s been clarified that it was 90 days following the passage until the law went into effect- are you claiming that this happened before the 90 days? I haven’t compared the dates but can do so.This wasn't an issue at all until the fascist MAGAt-GOP passed that law.
There is treatment for Rheumatoid arthritis... and its not the abortion pill....
You don't care about suffering.
I believe that’s been clarified that it was 90 days following the passage until the law went into effect- are you claiming that this happened before the 90 days? I haven’t compared the dates but can do so.
Then what was it?...Her medicine was not "the abortion pill"...
Come on Canon don’t get me involved with your little personal disputes. I try to stick to the facts of importance but I have developed loyalties, I have to say I am human, but I try to stay out of the mud when I can so carry-onIt really doesn't matter when it happened. The girl was prescribed the medicine.
Zealots like Marvin and Ranbunctious, however, have gotten it into their head that this 14 year old girl was refilling a prescription for abortion pills...
Then what was it?...
How could they claim that the law caused the pharmacist to deny the medication if the law wasn’t in effect?
The passage of the law is what kept the pharmacist from refilling the prescription. Whether that was before or after the 90 days doesn't matter. The pharmacist wasn't going to refill it...
Until it was cleared by the doctor, just like all drug refills. You pro-aborts are so easy to fool, the death cult can feed you any story they want and you'll run with it.
Look at this one. You're SO fucking dumb, you believe this girl had completely run out of her medication before going in to get a refill, which means she either took too many of them, or waited too long to get the refill.
You didn't ask, because you're a dumb tool of the pro-abort left, and they love you for it. Next time you get your talking points from Nancy Pelosi, tell her to fuck off from me!
Not sure what you're trying to say there, but this was a medication which had previously been prescribed to the girl. This was a refill. There never should've been a question about it.
As I stated in my first post, this is a case of one pharmacist who works in a Walgreen’s pharmacy. Whether or not she was influenced by any legal changes I don’t claim to know, perhaps she was influenced. My point remains it was one act by one individual. The medication was refilled the next day when the error was corrected.The passage of the law is what kept the pharmacist from refilling the prescription. Whether that was before or after the 90 days doesn't matter. The pharmacist wasn't going to refill it...