BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
Gotta love right-wing hypocrisy.
"My cattle should be able to freeload on whatever land they want!".
All they do is talk their bullshit talk about liberals wanting stuff from the government, but who gets the stuff? Republicans do.
Military budget? All for Republicans and their supporters.
Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid? Who's sucking all those benefits back? Right, old white crabby Republicans who have all the free time in the world to listen to AM radio all day pretending like it's all the rest of us who are lazy. Meanwhile, we're the ones subsidizing their lazy, angry asses.
I would have shot all the cattle and arrested the freeloading rancher.
You would have to get off your ass before you did anything beyond run your mouth.
In America, we don't kill people or cattle over grazing fees. And, we didn't use to send in an army of armed marshalls to enforce grazing prohibitions. We use the courts for such issues.
What we have here is an attempt by the BLM to intimidate citizens with a show of force, and the citizens did not like that idea. So, they stood with the family that the intimidation was aimed at. That is America at its best.
What is even worse, is that this was all initiated by Dirty Harry Reid and his crony capitalism with a Chinese company aimed at ripping off the taxpayers for the benefit of Reid and his crony capitalist.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
"On November 3, 1998, the Court issued an order permanently enjoining Bundy from grazing his livestock on the former Bunkerville Allotment ('The Allotment'), and ordering him to remove his livestock no later than November 30, 1998, and pay damages to the United States in the amount of $200 per day per head for any remaining livestock on the allotment after November 30, 1998." The court stated that "[t]he government has shown commendable restraint in allowing this trespass to continue for so long without impounding Bundy’s livestock."[4] On September 17, 1999, after Bundy failed to comply with the court’s earlier order(s), the court issued another order directing Bundy to comply with the 1998 permanent injunction and modifying the trespass damages owed.[3][4][5]
Bundy standoff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-cliven-bundys-unconstitutional-stand/360587/
Bundy said in a radio interview last Thursday. "I abide by all of Nevada state laws. But I don’t recognize the United States government as even existing." Ironically, this position directly contradicts Article 1, Section 2 of the Nevada Constitution:
Last edited: