2016 What’s Wrong With Hillary?

[Freewill]

Here is a good read on Mrs Tulza Clinton. Remember not many months ago Trump was written off as not having a chance? Things change, maybe not as much as Mrs. Clinton's positions, but they change.

Right or left this pretty much spells out the problem with a lying Mrs. Clinton. The added bonus is that it will be a break from the apparently new MEME handed out by the DNC, praising socialism.

What’s Wrong With Hillary?

A snippet from the article:

In another era, there wouldn’t be much a problem with that label. FDR and JFK had little problem overcoming the burden of wealth and to-the-manor born privilege, and there was a time when “Experience Counts” was actually a campaign slogan (albeit for Nixon in 1960). The problem for Clinton, however, is that, should she be facing Donald Trump, she would be facing an opponent who may be uniquely capable of turning her experience into a liability … not to mention exploiting her other vulnerabilities.

As the notion of a Trump nomination has morphed from ludicrous to probable, analysts left and right have come to something of a consensus. Whether it’s Charles Murray in the Wall Street Journal, speaking for conservatives, or Thomas Frank in the Guardian, opining for liberals, the analysis focuses on the large cohort of Americans who have been effectively shut out of the economy for two decades or more. Trump’s feral insight has been to play on these grievances with a message that defines the cause—and the villains—in unmistakable terms.

We’ve been played for suckers by foreign countries, by our incompetent leaders, by politicians who serve the elite, and who do the bidding of the insiders. We’re letting our worst enemies gain footholds across the Middle East. I don’t need their money; I can’t be bought. And the very crudeness of my language, the threats, even the bullying, tells you I have the stones to take these people on. And if the “experts” think I don't know what I’m talking about—how have the “experts” done in Iraq, in Libya, in protecting the jobs and incomes of regular Americans?



Read more: What’s Wrong With Hillary?
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Silly Freewill. The GOP is working harder to shut trump down than the DNC is. They know he will never be president, but if he gets the nomination, it will destroy the GOP for decades

The GOP is trying to rig the process at the RNC. Hillary has her Moveon.org friends trying to stifle freedom of speech at Trump rallies. It appears they are working together.

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

 

[mudwhistle]

Here is a good read on Mrs Tulza Clinton. Remember not many months ago Trump was written off as not having a chance? Things change, maybe not as much as Mrs. Clinton's positions, but they change.

Right or left this pretty much spells out the problem with a lying Mrs. Clinton. The added bonus is that it will be a break from the apparently new MEME handed out by the DNC, praising socialism.

What’s Wrong With Hillary?

A snippet from the article:

In another era, there wouldn’t be much a problem with that label. FDR and JFK had little problem overcoming the burden of wealth and to-the-manor born privilege, and there was a time when “Experience Counts” was actually a campaign slogan (albeit for Nixon in 1960). The problem for Clinton, however, is that, should she be facing Donald Trump, she would be facing an opponent who may be uniquely capable of turning her experience into a liability … not to mention exploiting her other vulnerabilities.

As the notion of a Trump nomination has morphed from ludicrous to probable, analysts left and right have come to something of a consensus. Whether it’s Charles Murray in the Wall Street Journal, speaking for conservatives, or Thomas Frank in the Guardian, opining for liberals, the analysis focuses on the large cohort of Americans who have been effectively shut out of the economy for two decades or more. Trump’s feral insight has been to play on these grievances with a message that defines the cause—and the villains—in unmistakable terms.

We’ve been played for suckers by foreign countries, by our incompetent leaders, by politicians who serve the elite, and who do the bidding of the insiders. We’re letting our worst enemies gain footholds across the Middle East. I don’t need their money; I can’t be bought. And the very crudeness of my language, the threats, even the bullying, tells you I have the stones to take these people on. And if the “experts” think I don't know what I’m talking about—how have the “experts” done in Iraq, in Libya, in protecting the jobs and incomes of regular Americans?



Read more: What’s Wrong With Hillary?
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Silly Freewill. The GOP is working harder to shut trump down than the DNC is. They know he will never be president, but if he gets the nomination, it will destroy the GOP for decades

The GOP is trying to rig the process at the RNC. Hillary has her Moveon.org friends trying to stifle freedom of speech at Trump rallies. It appears they are working together.

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

 

[eddiew]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Spewing hate today, are you? Is that the latest talking points being handed down by the DNC? Sure seems like all the liberals are singing the same tune.

Freewill Hate you say??? I say when in Rome do what the Romans do So we just emulate you cowardly haters

 

[Freewill]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Spewing hate today, are you? Is that the latest talking points being handed down by the DNC? Sure seems like all the liberals are singing the same tune.

Freewill Hate you say??? I say when in Rome do what the Romans do So we just emulate you cowardly haters

More hate from you, when do you think you will have your fill? Your inner soul not dark enough yet?

Here is a little experiment for you. Go back, or start now, and count who and when the word hate is used. You will see that what I posted is very correct. Let's do this. Will just count those who use the word hate, as you do, against others and they pretend they are above all that hate. You know, the hypocrites.

 

[Freewill]

Silly Freewill. The GOP is working harder to shut trump down than the DNC is. They know he will never be president, but if he gets the nomination, it will destroy the GOP for decades

The GOP is trying to rig the process at the RNC. Hillary has her Moveon.org friends trying to stifle freedom of speech at Trump rallies. It appears they are working together.

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

And your point is what? Yes, there are rules that run the nomination. The rules you point out were made before Trump ever started running and they DON'T ensure the establishment candidate wins. The rules might make it harder for a favorite southern candidate to win but that could be changed by those in the south changing the day they vote.

So what you posted and what i posted are both true but the one you posted has nothing to do with the RNC stealing the nomination from Trump.

 

[mudwhistle]

The GOP is trying to rig the process at the RNC. Hillary has her Moveon.org friends trying to stifle freedom of speech at Trump rallies. It appears they are working together.

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

And your point is what? Yes, there are rules that run the nomination. The rules you point out were made before Trump ever started running and they DON'T ensure the establishment candidate wins. The rules might make it harder for a favorite southern candidate to win but that could be changed by those in the south changing the day they vote.

So what you posted and what i posted are both true but the one you posted has nothing to do with the RNC stealing the nomination from Trump.

The process is already rigged, but when they meet in April, they plan on making it even harder, and they haven't even hid the fact. They mentioned changing rules to give each candidate equal representation without considering delegate totals, essentially elbowing the front-runner back into the pack with the rest of them.

 

[eddiew]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

I'm not a republican so your silly analogy fails. The republican party left me

 

[Freewill]

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

And your point is what? Yes, there are rules that run the nomination. The rules you point out were made before Trump ever started running and they DON'T ensure the establishment candidate wins. The rules might make it harder for a favorite southern candidate to win but that could be changed by those in the south changing the day they vote.

So what you posted and what i posted are both true but the one you posted has nothing to do with the RNC stealing the nomination from Trump.

The process is already rigged, but when they meet in April, they plan on making it even harder, and they haven't even hid the fact. They mentioned changing rules to give each candidate equal representation without considering delegate totals, essentially elbowing the front-runner back into the pack with the rest of them.

Speculation, do you have a link?

 

[hunarcy]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Still going for the personal attack because you have no facts? I had hoped you would have upped your game since P2K

 

[eddiew]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

I'm not a republican so your silly analogy fails. The republican party left me

I'm glad to hear that They left me too soon after voting for gwb in 2000 BUT unlike you I became a supporter of most of the other sides issues ,,not all but most ,,,,,,I was tired of those weasel republicans raining their hate down on america

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

I'm not a republican so your silly analogy fails. The republican party left me

I'm glad to hear that They left me too soon after voting for gwb in 2000 BUT unlike you I became a supporter of most of the other sides issues ,,not all but most ,,,,,,I was tired of those weasel republicans raining their hate down on america

You whine about hate and post hate....sorta funny

 

[mudwhistle]

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

And your point is what? Yes, there are rules that run the nomination. The rules you point out were made before Trump ever started running and they DON'T ensure the establishment candidate wins. The rules might make it harder for a favorite southern candidate to win but that could be changed by those in the south changing the day they vote.

So what you posted and what i posted are both true but the one you posted has nothing to do with the RNC stealing the nomination from Trump.

The process is already rigged, but when they meet in April, they plan on making it even harder, and they haven't even hid the fact. They mentioned changing rules to give each candidate equal representation without considering delegate totals, essentially elbowing the front-runner back into the pack with the rest of them.

Speculation, do you have a link?

Listen to what they say. They're trying to stop Trump, any way possible. If he doesn't win Florida or Ohio, he can't get enough delegates. In the next couple of weeks they'll know what they're going to do.

 

[eddiew]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Still going for the personal attack because you have no facts? I had hoped you would have upped your game since P2K

Hunarcy What facts ?? All you have to do is listen to the leading clown of your party and his 2 wannabesThere is nothing there except hate for obama hate for hillary hate for dems ,,BTW I remember you too from P2k....you haven't changed either Still support bushs war based on bs??

 

[eddiew]

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

I'm not a republican so your silly analogy fails. The republican party left me

I'm glad to hear that They left me too soon after voting for gwb in 2000 BUT unlike you I became a supporter of most of the other sides issues ,,not all but most ,,,,,,I was tired of those weasel republicans raining their hate down on america

You whine about hate and post hate....sorta funny

I like to give as much as I get or as much as the party of my choice gets

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Still going for the personal attack because you have no facts? I had hoped you would have upped your game since P2K

Hunarcy What facts ?? All you have to do is listen to the leading clown of your party and his 2 wannabesThere is nothing there except hate for obama hate for hillary hate for dems ,,BTW I remember you too from P2k....you haven't changed either Still support bushs war based on bs??

Eddie whines about hate as he spews hate for republicans...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I'm not a republican, loon. Every time you comment the fail meter pegs

Sassy one rule I go by ,,If you're in the forest and you see something that looks like a bear eats like a bear shits like a bear IT'S A BEAR......So on this board if I see some one that hates like a republican that despises our president all the time like a repub that shows hate for the next president like a repub you must be a republican

I'm not a republican so your silly analogy fails. The republican party left me

I'm glad to hear that They left me too soon after voting for gwb in 2000 BUT unlike you I became a supporter of most of the other sides issues ,,not all but most ,,,,,,I was tired of those weasel republicans raining their hate down on america

You whine about hate and post hate....sorta funny

I like to give as much as I get or as much as the party of my choice gets

Then don't whine about something you're doing, dumbass.....that makes you a hateful hypocrite

 

[BULLDOG]

The GOP is trying to rig the process at the RNC. Hillary has her Moveon.org friends trying to stifle freedom of speech at Trump rallies. It appears they are working together.

What is your evidence of the first accusation? It appears to me to be just a repeat of the left wing meme. It is the democrats that have already rigged the election in favor of Mrs Tulza Clinton. This is a clear example of how liberals double speak. THEY rig the election then they get you to believe that the GOP are the ones doing EXACTLY what they are doing.

I will give the left wing credit, they know propaganda. Of course owning the MSM doesn't hurt.

My evidence is their actual statements. The statements of the other candidates. Kasich said yesterday morning that he's going to win Ohio and force a Brokered Convention. The key is that they openly admitting to a conspiracy to keep Trump below 1237 delegates and changing the rules so that any candidate or non-candidate will have an equal chance of winning the nomination regardless how many states they won.

What Katich said may be more wishful thinking then actually the GOP trying to stop Trump. IF there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, as the primary vote dictates, then the delegates are free to vote for someone else. THAT is the process. THAT is not the democrat process. Their superdelegates are able to vote for whomever whenever, even if they pledge themselves before the primaries.

Who admitted to changing the rules? Not the chairman he said the opposite.

And you trust him?
RNC Rule Makes 2016 Difficult for Non-Establishment Candidates

And your point is what? Yes, there are rules that run the nomination. The rules you point out were made before Trump ever started running and they DON'T ensure the establishment candidate wins. The rules might make it harder for a favorite southern candidate to win but that could be changed by those in the south changing the day they vote.

So what you posted and what i posted are both true but the one you posted has nothing to do with the RNC stealing the nomination from Trump.

Are you trying to say the GOP isn't determined to steal the election from T-rump? There have been more than enough public statements by leading Republicans to prove they are.

 

[hunarcy]

A better question is what is right with the Hildabeast, in my lifetime I can't recall a more flawed candidate

lol coming from a vile dishonest hate filled republican ,,that's funny,,,,,,,,,,but expected

Still going for the personal attack because you have no facts? I had hoped you would have upped your game since P2K

Hunarcy What facts ?? All you have to do is listen to the leading clown of your party and his 2 wannabesThere is nothing there except hate for obama hate for hillary hate for dems ,,BTW I remember you too from P2k....you haven't changed either Still support bushs war based on bs??

Eddie, I was ALWAYS nice to you as you know. But, you lead off with a personal attack because you have nothing else so say. You did it with sassy, you're doing it with me. It's just so...disappointing.

 

[bendog]

Here is a good read on Mrs Tulza Clinton. Remember not many months ago Trump was written off as not having a chance? Things change, maybe not as much as Mrs. Clinton's positions, but they change.

Right or left this pretty much spells out the problem with a lying Mrs. Clinton. The added bonus is that it will be a break from the apparently new MEME handed out by the DNC, praising socialism.

What’s Wrong With Hillary?

A snippet from the article:

In another era, there wouldn’t be much a problem with that label. FDR and JFK had little problem overcoming the burden of wealth and to-the-manor born privilege, and there was a time when “Experience Counts” was actually a campaign slogan (albeit for Nixon in 1960). The problem for Clinton, however, is that, should she be facing Donald Trump, she would be facing an opponent who may be uniquely capable of turning her experience into a liability … not to mention exploiting her other vulnerabilities.

As the notion of a Trump nomination has morphed from ludicrous to probable, analysts left and right have come to something of a consensus. Whether it’s Charles Murray in the Wall Street Journal, speaking for conservatives, or Thomas Frank in the Guardian, opining for liberals, the analysis focuses on the large cohort of Americans who have been effectively shut out of the economy for two decades or more. Trump’s feral insight has been to play on these grievances with a message that defines the cause—and the villains—in unmistakable terms.

We’ve been played for suckers by foreign countries, by our incompetent leaders, by politicians who serve the elite, and who do the bidding of the insiders. We’re letting our worst enemies gain footholds across the Middle East. I don’t need their money; I can’t be bought. And the very crudeness of my language, the threats, even the bullying, tells you I have the stones to take these people on. And if the “experts” think I don't know what I’m talking about—how have the “experts” done in Iraq, in Libya, in protecting the jobs and incomes of regular Americans?



Read more: What’s Wrong With Hillary?
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Silly Freewill. The GOP is working harder to shut trump down than the DNC is. They know he will never be president, but if he gets the nomination, it will destroy the GOP for decades

I agree Trump is unelectable ... even running against Hillary (assuming she capitalizes on Bernie's enthusiasm). But, I think nominating Trump is the only way to break the establishment's stranglehold on conservatism. They are not fiscal conservatives, and they are attracting workers' soley on social issues, but the irony is that the same can be said of the Donald. Perhaps the gop could actually nominate a conservative next time around.