24 Points from Barr

[CrusaderFrank]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Are they looking for maximum impact on the election?

Obama? Hell, Yeah!

 

[berg80]

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Gee, ya think that could be in order to release the sleazeball report of Barr's design close to the election for maximum effect. Wake up. You're being played.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Are they looking for maximum impact on the election?

Obama? Hell, Yeah!

Obama is dictating when to release the Durham report?

That seems a bit far fetched.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Are they looking for maximum impact on the election?

Obama? Hell, Yeah!

Obama is dictating when to release the Durham report?

That seems a bit far fetched.

We're not Stalinist democrats who call CNN because we're going to smash down Comey's door and frogmarch him

We need to make sure Comey and his Masters get a fair trial when charged with sedition and treason. No sloppy fake FISA warrants here

 

[bripat9643]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

 

[B. Kidd]

Next comes the Barr Democrat pile-on to erode his credibility. It already began in today's IG hearing by Dimms.
Democrat State media will take their cue along with USMB Stalinist Dimm supporters.

You vile scum are sooo predictable.

 

[bripat9643]

Next comes the Barr Democrat pile-on to erode his credibility. It already began in today's IG hearing by Dimms.
Democrat State media will take their cue along with USMB Stalinist Dimm supporters.

You vile scum are sooo predictable.

Dims never fail to attack the reputation of those who point the finger at them.

 

[B. Kidd]

Next comes the Barr Democrat pile-on to erode his credibility. It already began in today's IG hearing by Dimms.
Democrat State media will take their cue along with USMB Stalinist Dimm supporters.

You vile scum are sooo predictable.

Dims never fail to attack the reputation of those who point the finger at them.

They'll eventually get specific in their attacks.
It'll be centered around that he is a racist OR that he is a sexist OR that he is in collusion with Russia, Russia, Russia.
This is all the Dimms have anymore!
What a sad Party.......

 

[Slade3200]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

What bullshit is his?
Who's spy's targeted Hillary?

 

[Zorro!]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

3. Regarding FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party and I cannot think of another recent instance where this happened.

you can read the rest on their site.

BARR IS ON THE CASE


BARR

“The real meat of Horowitz’s work and the real thrust of the report actually deals with the conduct of the investigation rather than its opening where I think it quickly became apparent that it was a travesty and there were many abuses. And that’s by far the most important part of the report and I think Mike Horowitz would agree with that.”

“From day one the investigation generated exculpatory information and nothing that substantiated any kind of collusion.”

“It’s a big deal to use the law enforcement and intelligence resources of the United States government to investigate a presidential campaign, especially of the opposing party.”

“Where I disagree with Horowitz is I just think the basis for opening the investigations was very flimsy.”

“From my experience, the normal thing to do in this situation — and I have had analogous experience — is to go to the campaign and here I don’t think there’s a legitimate explanation for why they didn’t, especially because they went to the Russians.”

“It’s hard to look at this stuff and not think it was a gross abuse.”
​

Baker then asks Barr whether he thinks the four FISA judges who approved the Obama administration’s FISA applications on Carter Page were “badly misled.” Answer: “Yes.”

 

[bripat9643]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

 

[Slade3200]

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

 

[bripat9643]

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

Meaningless. Horowitz just accepts what the people he questions tell him about their motives.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/william-barr-has-suddenly-become-chatty-and-hes-provided-quite-an-information-dump_3171471.html?irclickid=Q82zYPS4lxyJR3k0MdV3iVCmUknyFvzxxx:xWE0&irgwc=1

11. The Inspector General operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he cannot find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it.

12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz did not rule out improper motive; he did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You have to spy to see if you can find basis for a legitimate investigation

 

[Slade3200]

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

Meaningless. Horowitz just accepts what the people questions tells him about their motives.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/william-barr-has-suddenly-become-chatty-and-hes-provided-quite-an-information-dump_3171471.html?irclickid=Q82zYPS4lxyJR3k0MdV3iVCmUknyFvzxxx:xWE0&irgwc=1

11. The Inspector General operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he cannot find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it.

12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz did not rule out improper motive; he did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

no, you are making that up too. He address it during the hearing today which you clearly didn’t watch. Keep talking though. It’s entertaining

 

[bripat9643]

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

Quit pretending that you have read the report. We all know you haven't read a 500 page report in two days.

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack. However, it was actually just an offhand barroom comment by a young campaign aide described merely as a “suggestion of a suggestion, a vague allusion” to the fact that the Russians may have something they can dump. But by that time, May 2016, there was already rampant speculation online and in political circles that the Russians had hacked Hillary emails in 2014 and that they might surface. So the idea that Papadopoulos’s comment showed pre-knowledge of the Democratic National Committee hack and dump “is a big stretch.”​

 

[bripat9643]

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

Meaningless. Horowitz just accepts what the people questions tells him about their motives.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/william-barr-has-suddenly-become-chatty-and-hes-provided-quite-an-information-dump_3171471.html?irclickid=Q82zYPS4lxyJR3k0MdV3iVCmUknyFvzxxx:xWE0&irgwc=1

11. The Inspector General operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he cannot find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it.

12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz did not rule out improper motive; he did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

no, you are making that up too. He address it during the hearing today which you clearly didn’t watch. Keep talking though. It’s entertaining

How did he address it?

 

[Oddball]

12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz did not rule out improper motive; he did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

"Documentary" and "testimonial" are words that we in the semantics biz call "qualifiers"...However, there is a container ship load of circumstantial evidence that the Stasi-esque operation was malignantly biased from front to back...A shame no Senator asked that question.

 

[Slade3200]

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?

Only because douchebags like Comey, Brennan and Strozk are utterly corrupt. Their "suspicions" were just an excuse for spying on Trump.

not according to this report. You’re just making that up. Time to update those broken record talking points

No, I didn't make it up. What is their legitimate justification for spying on the Trump campaign?

read the report. It doesn’t say they spied on trump. It said the investigation was valid and not started out of political bias. The FISA renewal for Carter page involved a doctored email trying to dismiss a witness, there there are issues around that

Get your facts straight and stop making things up.

Quit pretending that you have read the report. We all know you haven't read a 500 page report in two days.

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack. However, it was actually just an offhand barroom comment by a young campaign aide described merely as a “suggestion of a suggestion, a vague allusion” to the fact that the Russians may have something they can dump. But by that time, May 2016, there was already rampant speculation online and in political circles that the Russians had hacked Hillary emails in 2014 and that they might surface. So the idea that Papadopoulos’s comment showed pre-knowledge of the Democratic National Committee hack and dump “is a big stretch.”​

Barr is a political player in my book. He has not proven to be objective in the least. I respect Horowitz... go ahead and point to anytime he said Obama spied on Trump... you can’t cause it didn’t happen