2nd Amendment fan! Your fantasy is coming true!

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!
Looting did not happen? Burning businesses down did not happen? God you are BEYOND STUPID.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
Proseters are not insurrectionists.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!

Looters are looting in protest, so protesters are looters.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!
Looting did not happen? Burning businesses down did not happen? God you are BEYOND STUPID.
Are ALL protesters looters?
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!


In a lot of places in this country, the mayors and governors don't want to protect the people.

Charles Bronson demonstrates the need for so called "assault weapons", and why Draconian Gun Control can never be allowed

 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!

Looters are looting in protest, so protesters are looters.
ALL protesters are looters?
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
Proseters are not insurrectionists.

They're domestic terrorists.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
Proseters are not insurrectionists.
When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!

Looters are looting in protest, so protesters are looters.
ALL protesters are looters?

Let God sort them out. That's what He does best.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!


In a lot of places in this country, the mayors and governors don't want to protect the people.

Charles Bronson demonstrates the need for so called "assault weapons", and why Draconian Gun Control can never be allowed


So you're in the childish cinematic group.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
Proseters are not insurrectionists.
When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.
Do you see all protesters as looters?
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.
The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!
I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.
Proseters are not insurrectionists.
When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.
Do you see all protesters as looters?
NO but you don't see looters rioters and arsonists at all cause you are STUPID as stump post.
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?


You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.
That's not legal. It's tyranny.
Cite the law please!
 
Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?
If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.
Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?
Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Stop calling protesters looters!

Looters are looting in protest, so protesters are looters.
ALL protesters are looters?

Let God sort them out. That's what He does best.
'Murcia!

You're clearly not down with American values.
 

Forum List

Back
Top