Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2013
- 95,459
- 67,744
Color me shocked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what might your basis for that opinion? I rather doubt you've ever done any coding, you obviously have no better than a remedial science education and most certainly have no familiarity whatsoever with current climate modeling. I also am absolutely certain that your sources suffer from the same shortcomings. So... justify yourself doof.Climate models are nothing more than shit in shit out computer models that often input fraudulent or cherry picked data. They are usually developed by universities that deliver the product the customer that provided the grant wanted.
And once again weather is climate!!Corn Belt climate difficult to predict. Extremes have been making rapid changes lately.
![]()
Climate extremes and their impacts on agriculture across the Eastern Corn Belt Region of the U.S.
The Eastern Corn Belt Region (ECBR) is an important agricultural sector for the U.S. This study analyzes the climate extremes over the contemporary (1…www.sciencedirect.com
Weather patterns in the Corn Belt are changing in a way that will result in less and less moisture in the soil.
A Climate Change Double Whammy in the U.S. Corn Belt - American Geophysical Union
news.climate.columbia.edu
Climate models are nothing more than shit in shit out computer models that often input fraudulent or cherry picked data. They are usually developed by universities that deliver the product the customer that provided the grant wanted.
Climate models are nothing more than shit in shit out computer models that often input fraudulent or cherry picked data.
Impossible for manmade programs created by people with a political and financial agenda can be inaccurate!Crick: And what might your basis for that opinion? I rather doubt you've ever done any coding, you obviously have no better than a remedial science education and most certainly have no familiarity whatsoever with current climate modeling. I also am absolutely certain that your sources suffer from the same shortcomings. So... justify yourself doof.
ME:
The output from any computer model is dependent on the data that is input into it, the parameters/constants(assumptions) that are used, and algorithms and programming logic that processes the data to arrive at whatever conclusions. The validity of the data, accuracy of the assumptions, and logic employed by the programming are all at the mercy of the people who create the model; however flawed any and all of that shows up in the results.
The history of all climate models that predict future climate catastrophe have without exception turned out to be wrong, significantly so in most instances. The computer merely processes what it is given, so when the conclusions reached are inaccurate then it kinda casts doubt on the veracity of those who created them and those who try to support certain political and financial actions. Especially when so much money is involved and political futures at stake. In other words:
The articles to which I linked regarded climate.And once again weather is climate!!
CMIP GCMs are public. The input and output from the programs are publicly accessible. See PCMDI - An overview of CMIPCrick: And what might your basis for that opinion? I rather doubt you've ever done any coding, you obviously have no better than a remedial science education and most certainly have no familiarity whatsoever with current climate modeling. I also am absolutely certain that your sources suffer from the same shortcomings. So... justify yourself doof.
ME:
The output from any computer model is dependent on the data that is input into it, the parameters/constants(assumptions) that are used, and algorithms and programming logic that processes the data to arrive at whatever conclusions. The validity of the data, accuracy of the assumptions, and logic employed by the programming are all at the mercy of the people who create the model; however flawed any and all of that shows up in the results.
In other words, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.The history of all climate models that predict future climate catastrophe have without exception turned out to be wrong, significantly so in most instances. The computer merely processes what it is given, so when the conclusions reached are inaccurate then it kinda casts doubt on the veracity of those who created them and those who try to support certain political and financial actions. Especially when so much money is involved and political futures at stake. In other words: