4,000 ukrainian fascists dead, 1,500 captured. Azov Battalion destroyed in Mariupol.

Best just to stay out of it.
Not the Histwhorians' Narrative

Or we should depose the Globalists and switch sides, throwing the Slavic Swastickers under the bus, like we did in an alliance with Russia against the German Nazis.

In the 30s, there was never any pacifist "appeasement." The West's ruling class saw Hitler as a tool to destroy Communism. Only when he showed by the Nazi-Soviet alliance in partitioning Poland that he wanted Germany to rule over all, Communists and Capitalists, did our transnationalist rulers decide to stop him.

Even then, American Isolationists decided to let England and France save them, or at least England's invincible navy would. But, after the pre-emptive invasion of Russia by Hitler, which Stalin, in a draw play, made look like Russia would last no longer than France did, FDR arranged our entrance through provoking an attack by Japan, Hitler's ally in the East.

It is no coincidence that Stalin didn't start fighting back until December 7, 1941. Our rulers' scribblers claim that he kept troops in Siberia until then because he was afraid of Japan opening a second front there, but they intentionally omit the fact that Marshall Zhukov had soundly defeated Japan in Mongolia way back in September, 1939.
 
"As soon as Russian forces take the city of Mariupol under control, the Kiev regime will fall. The capture of Mariupol and its complete liberation from the Ukrainian neo-nazis is of great importance for the Russian Army."
(Vladimir Kozin, Academy of Military Sciences of the Russian Federation)
 
You should go back and review Scott Ritter 2 video where he claims Odessa is not important.
I disagree with him saying that Odessa isn't important.
Because the major port city of Odessa would give Russia complete control of the entire northern coastline of the Black Sea.
And then Russia could also link up with and annex Transnistria, which is a long narrow strip of land between Ukraine and Moldova.
The independent territory of Transnistria is a disputed hold over from the Soviet Union era and the majority of the people are pro-Russia and want to be a part of Russia.
This would further box in Ukraine and expand Russia towards the west.

1650148301444.png
 
Last edited:
I disagree with him saying that Odessa isn't important.
Because the major port city of Odessa would give Russia complete control of the entire northern coastline of the Black Sea.
And then Russia could also link up with and annex Transnistria, which is a long narrow strip of land between Ukraine and Moldova.
The independent territory of Transnistria is a disputed hold over from the Soviet Union era and the majority of the people are pro-Russia and want to be a part of Russia.
This would further box in Ukraine and expand Russia towards the west.

View attachment 631644

Besides, when Russia takes Odessa, Ukraine has no ports to export Ukrainian wheat by ship!
:muahaha:
 
I disagree with him saying that Odessa isn't important.
Because the major port city of Odessa would give Russia complete control of the entire northern coastline of the Black Sea.
And then Russia could also link up with and annex Transnistria, which is a long narrow strip of land between Ukraine and Moldova.
The independent territory of Transnistria is a disputed hold over from the Soviet Union era and the majority of the people are pro-Russia and want to be a part of Russia.
This would further box in Ukraine and expand Russia towards the west.

View attachment 631644
The reasoning makes sense, though we don't know Putin's plan.
 

Forum List

Back
Top