Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
youve been doing the same thing with all these scripture quotes youve been posting as well. dont be mad when someone does the same thing to refute your argument.
No you idiot. I offered verses that shown scientific accuracy within the Bible and all were in context.
Damn you're stupid!
once again, nothing in the bible is scientifically accurate. you are willing to stretch the truth in order to support your argument about this. but you wont open your mind to the fact that many bible scholars say the earth was created 6,000 years ago as is supported by stories the bible.
No you idiot. I offered verses that shown scientific accuracy within the Bible and all were in context.
Damn you're stupid!
once again, nothing in the bible is scientifically accurate. you are willing to stretch the truth in order to support your argument about this. but you wont open your mind to the fact that many bible scholars say the earth was created 6,000 years ago as is supported by stories the bible.
Once again many things in the bible are consistant with science. (prove it, other than your wild claim about moses and magical 12 hour 65 mph perfectly directed wind)
once again, nothing in the bible is scientifically accurate. you are willing to stretch the truth in order to support your argument about this. but you wont open your mind to the fact that many bible scholars say the earth was created 6,000 years ago as is supported by stories the bible.
Once again many things in the bible are consistant with science. (prove it, other than your wild claim about moses and magical 12 hour 65 mph perfectly directed wind)
you have no scientific basis for anything in the bible. you spout of nonsensical bullshit and claim that science backs up what you claim.
Carbon dating has been proven to be accurate within a 1% time frame by multiple sources. thats a scientific fact! it doesnt rely on some random story written and embellished by man a few thousand years ago.
[
No it hasn't and isn't and I've already shown proof of that too.
Once again many things in the bible are consistant with science. (prove it, other than your wild claim about moses and magical 12 hour 65 mph perfectly directed wind)
you have no scientific basis for anything in the bible. you spout of nonsensical bullshit and claim that science backs up what you claim.
Carbon dating has been proven to be accurate within a 1% time frame by multiple sources. thats a scientific fact! it doesnt rely on some random story written and embellished by man a few thousand years ago.
Statements in the Bible are consistant with science and I've already shown that to be true. Not my fault you're too stupid to understand it.
No it hasn't and isn't and I've already shown proof of that too. It's based on assumptions, for example, they assume the rate of decay has been a constant rate for millions of years.
If you research carbon 14 dating you'll find it supports a young earth, but I doubt you would trust in that data because it doesn't fit your preconcieved notion that the earth is millions of years old.
you have no scientific basis for anything in the bible. you spout of nonsensical bullshit and claim that science backs up what you claim.
Carbon dating has been proven to be accurate within a 1% time frame by multiple sources. thats a scientific fact! it doesnt rely on some random story written and embellished by man a few thousand years ago.
Statements in the Bible are consistant with science and I've already shown that to be true. Not my fault you're too stupid to understand it.
No it hasn't and isn't and I've already shown proof of that too. It's based on assumptions, for example, they assume the rate of decay has been a constant rate for millions of years.
If you research carbon 14 dating you'll find it supports a young earth, but I doubt you would trust in that data because it doesn't fit your preconcieved notion that the earth is millions of years old.
carbon dating support an the old earth theory. if you actually look at the website that try to discredit carbon dating that are all religious website. there is not one university or scientific research website that discredits carbon dating. you know cant disprove this so dont even try.
and no, you have not provided an solid scientific argument that proves anything in the bible. you try to quote science and apply it to you argument, but you fail to prove that anything in the bible in scientifically accurate.
the same way the Noah built this ark to house ever species of animal. the bible says he had about 16,000 species, well we all know that there are approx. 30 million species of animals (including plants and insects) on the planet. in order to have a boat that large it would need to be approximately 1,548,384 m long x 100 m wide (this is assuming each species get 4 square inches of space) not the 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet deep that the bible says it is.
also for it to rain for 40 continuous days and cover the earth, it would need to raid approx. 12" per second to cover the entire surface of the earth including the mountains in 40 days. simply not possible.
there are more scientific errors bible you even care to acknowledge:
- The Holy Bible makes it clear that stars are tiny objects in sky that will fall down when Jesus comes back
- All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. (insects have 6 legs)
- In Genesis, the moon is referred to as a "light" ("lesser light" actually). The moon is merely a reflector of the sun's light, and produces no visible light, although it does shine in different wavelengths not perceivable to the human eye, such as the infrareds.
you fail again.
Statements in the Bible are consistant with science and I've already shown that to be true. Not my fault you're too stupid to understand it.
No it hasn't and isn't and I've already shown proof of that too. It's based on assumptions, for example, they assume the rate of decay has been a constant rate for millions of years.
If you research carbon 14 dating you'll find it supports a young earth, but I doubt you would trust in that data because it doesn't fit your preconcieved notion that the earth is millions of years old.
carbon dating support an the old earth theory. if you actually look at the website that try to discredit carbon dating that are all religious website. there is not one university or scientific research website that discredits carbon dating. you know cant disprove this so dont even try.
and no, you have not provided an solid scientific argument that proves anything in the bible. you try to quote science and apply it to you argument, but you fail to prove that anything in the bible in scientifically accurate.
the same way the Noah built this ark to house ever species of animal. the bible says he had about 16,000 species, well we all know that there are approx. 30 million species of animals (including plants and insects) on the planet. in order to have a boat that large it would need to be approximately 1,548,384 m long x 100 m wide (this is assuming each species get 4 square inches of space) not the 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet deep that the bible says it is.
also for it to rain for 40 continuous days and cover the earth, it would need to raid approx. 12" per second to cover the entire surface of the earth including the mountains in 40 days. simply not possible.
there are more scientific errors bible you even care to acknowledge:
- The Holy Bible makes it clear that stars are tiny objects in sky that will fall down when Jesus comes back
- All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. (insects have 6 legs)
- In Genesis, the moon is referred to as a "light" ("lesser light" actually). The moon is merely a reflector of the sun's light, and produces no visible light, although it does shine in different wavelengths not perceivable to the human eye, such as the infrareds.
you fail again.
The bible doesn't say how many animals were on the arc. Only an idiot would include species that could survive without the benefit of the ark. I doubt the 30 million species claim, it's more like 1 million.
And I've already proved that carbon dating is flawed.
Statements in the Bible are consistant with science and I've already shown that to be true. Not my fault you're too stupid to understand it.
No it hasn't and isn't and I've already shown proof of that too. It's based on assumptions, for example, they assume the rate of decay has been a constant rate for millions of years.
If you research carbon 14 dating you'll find it supports a young earth, but I doubt you would trust in that data because it doesn't fit your preconcieved notion that the earth is millions of years old.
carbon dating support an the old earth theory. if you actually look at the website that try to discredit carbon dating that are all religious website. there is not one university or scientific research website that discredits carbon dating. you know cant disprove this so dont even try.
and no, you have not provided an solid scientific argument that proves anything in the bible. you try to quote science and apply it to you argument, but you fail to prove that anything in the bible in scientifically accurate.
the same way the Noah built this ark to house ever species of animal. the bible says he had about 16,000 species, well we all know that there are approx. 30 million species of animals (including plants and insects) on the planet. in order to have a boat that large it would need to be approximately 1,548,384 m long x 100 m wide (this is assuming each species get 4 square inches of space) not the 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet deep that the bible says it is.
also for it to rain for 40 continuous days and cover the earth, it would need to raid approx. 12" per second to cover the entire surface of the earth including the mountains in 40 days. simply not possible.
there are more scientific errors bible you even care to acknowledge:
- The Holy Bible makes it clear that stars are tiny objects in sky that will fall down when Jesus comes back
- All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. (insects have 6 legs)
- In Genesis, the moon is referred to as a "light" ("lesser light" actually). The moon is merely a reflector of the sun's light, and produces no visible light, although it does shine in different wavelengths not perceivable to the human eye, such as the infrareds.
you fail again.
The bible doesn't say how many animals were on the arc. Only an idiot would include species that could survive without the benefit of the ark. I doubt the 30 million species claim, it's more like 1 million.
And I've already proved that carbon dating is flawed.
carbon dating support an the old earth theory. if you actually look at the website that try to discredit carbon dating that are all religious website. there is not one university or scientific research website that discredits carbon dating. you know cant disprove this so dont even try.
and no, you have not provided an solid scientific argument that proves anything in the bible. you try to quote science and apply it to you argument, but you fail to prove that anything in the bible in scientifically accurate.
the same way the Noah built this ark to house ever species of animal. the bible says he had about 16,000 species, well we all know that there are approx. 30 million species of animals (including plants and insects) on the planet. in order to have a boat that large it would need to be approximately 1,548,384 m long x 100 m wide (this is assuming each species get 4 square inches of space) not the 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet deep that the bible says it is.
also for it to rain for 40 continuous days and cover the earth, it would need to raid approx. 12" per second to cover the entire surface of the earth including the mountains in 40 days. simply not possible.
there are more scientific errors bible you even care to acknowledge:
- The Holy Bible makes it clear that stars are tiny objects in sky that will fall down when Jesus comes back
- All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. (insects have 6 legs)
- In Genesis, the moon is referred to as a "light" ("lesser light" actually). The moon is merely a reflector of the sun's light, and produces no visible light, although it does shine in different wavelengths not perceivable to the human eye, such as the infrareds.
you fail again.
The bible doesn't say how many animals were on the arc. Only an idiot would include species that could survive without the benefit of the ark. I doubt the 30 million species claim, it's more like 1 million.
And I've already proved that carbon dating is flawed.
"While it may be dangerous to extrapolate numbers like these to other places, it gives at least a high estimate of the number of species that could exist on earth - that high estimate being around 100 million species. A low estimate is 2 million."
How many species are there in the world?
and you have not disproven carbon dating, you made an argument claiming its in accurate. i have since posted proof from several different sources that prove carbon dating is accurate to within 1% currently. if you dont like the answers which then disprove the bible, its not my problem, youre just closed minded and ignorant.
"This is a very good question, but the truth is, its very hard to know, or even estimate. Currently there are about 1.4 million species described. Yet, we're probably far from being close to the actual number of species."
carbon dating support an the old earth theory. if you actually look at the website that try to discredit carbon dating that are all religious website. there is not one university or scientific research website that discredits carbon dating. you know cant disprove this so dont even try.
and no, you have not provided an solid scientific argument that proves anything in the bible. you try to quote science and apply it to you argument, but you fail to prove that anything in the bible in scientifically accurate.
the same way the Noah built this ark to house ever species of animal. the bible says he had about 16,000 species, well we all know that there are approx. 30 million species of animals (including plants and insects) on the planet. in order to have a boat that large it would need to be approximately 1,548,384 m long x 100 m wide (this is assuming each species get 4 square inches of space) not the 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet deep that the bible says it is.
also for it to rain for 40 continuous days and cover the earth, it would need to raid approx. 12" per second to cover the entire surface of the earth including the mountains in 40 days. simply not possible.
there are more scientific errors bible you even care to acknowledge:
- The Holy Bible makes it clear that stars are tiny objects in sky that will fall down when Jesus comes back
- All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. (insects have 6 legs)
- In Genesis, the moon is referred to as a "light" ("lesser light" actually). The moon is merely a reflector of the sun's light, and produces no visible light, although it does shine in different wavelengths not perceivable to the human eye, such as the infrareds.
you fail again.
The bible doesn't say how many animals were on the arc. Only an idiot would include species that could survive without the benefit of the ark. I doubt the 30 million species claim, it's more like 1 million.
And I've already proved that carbon dating is flawed.
can you please provide a list of all the animals and plant life that would not require the benefits of the arc that were know during the time of Noah?
The bible doesn't say how many animals were on the arc. Only an idiot would include species that could survive without the benefit of the ark. I doubt the 30 million species claim, it's more like 1 million.
And I've already proved that carbon dating is flawed.
can you please provide a list of all the animals and plant life that would not require the benefits of the arc that were know during the time of Noah?
According to Ernest Mayr, America's leading taxonomist, there are over 1 million species of animals in the world.
However, the vast majority of these are capable of surviving in water and would not need to be brought aboard the ark. Noah need make no provision for the 21,000 species of fish or the 1,700 tunicates (marine chordates like sea squirts) found throughout the seas of the world, or the 600 echinoderms including star fish and sea urchins, or the 107,000 mollusks such as mussels, clams and oysters, or the 10,000 coelenterates like corals and sea anemones, jelly fish and hydroids or the 5,000 species of sponges, or the 30,000 protozoans, the microscopic single-celled creatures.
In addition, some of the mammals are aquatic. For example, the whales, seals and porpoises. The amphibians need not all have been included, nor all the reptiles, such as sea turtles, and alligators. Moreover, a large number of the arthropods numbering 838,000 species, such as lobsters, shrimp, crabs and water fleas and barnacles are marine creatures. And the insect species among arthropoda are usually very small. Also, many of the 35,000 species of worms as well as many of the insects could have survived outside the Ark.
Looks like you lack all honesty!The passage was quoted several times where he calls for SLAYING his ENEMIES before him. Obviously the astrologers allowed him to "REIGN OVER THEM" and were spared. Anyone not on their knees will be slaughtered.25 Large crowds were traveling with Jesus, and turning to them he said: 26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sistersyes, even their own lifesuch a person cannot be my disciple. 27 And whoever does not carry their cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.
28 Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Wont you first sit down and estimate the cost to see if you have enough money to complete it? 29 For if you lay the foundation and are not able to finish it, everyone who sees it will ridicule you, 30 saying, This person began to build and wasnt able to finish.
31 Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Wont he first sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to oppose the one coming against him with twenty thousand? 32 If he is not able, he will send a delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of peace. 33 In the same way, those of you who do not give up everything you have cannot be my disciples.
34 Salt is good, but if it loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? 35 It is fit neither for the soil nor for the manure pile; it is thrown out.
Whoever has ears to hear, let them hear.
He is preparing them for the sacrifices that will be required of a disciple. He is letting them know how hard it is to follow in His footsteps. If you read about how the disciples die, you would have to agree, it was pretty hard.
Where is he telling them to "wipe out" another culture, another religion?
There was a passage in the NT that showed the Lord reaching out to "other religions": when the wise men used astrology to locate the Child Yeshua, they did so as followers of another faith. Yeshua did not demand that they follow Him. The Lord did not "kill" them because they did not convert on the discovery of the Child. They were protected and warned to flee before a jealous king.
And clearly in the passage you quoted the HATE comes BEFORE the SACRIFICE.
The point of my posts was to counter the claim that despite the many different authors the bible is still congruous. Obviously it is not. It is on both sides of many issues. It preaches both love and hate, a fixed, unmoving and unremoved Earth and a reeling, moving and removed Earth.
1Jo 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
1Jo 4:16 And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.
1 Corinthians 13:4) Love is long-suffering and kind. Love is not jealous, it does not brag, does not get puffed up,
5) does not behave indecently, does not look for its own interests, does not become provoked. It does not keep account of the injury.
6) It does not rejoice over unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth.
7) It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
Na 1:2 God is jealous, and the LORD revengeth; the LORD revengeth, and is furious; the LORD will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth wrath for his enemies.
Ex 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
Ex 34:14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:
Looks like those passages sum up a "ruler" that is very patient. His subjects are encouraged to follow the laws, when they do not, the punishments become more harsh. If they do not learn by judgement day, they will receive sentence. That sentence will be served.
Damn you are dishonest. You can't show anything out of context or you would have already, and you know it.So by default, you can't show that anything was out of context.Read the chapters in their entirety.
Thank you!
When you take one or two verses out of an entire chapter the verses by default are out of context.
Damn you're stupid.
BULLSHIT!!!Hell scientist can't even come to a concensus on the shroud of Turin after years of carbon dating.
BULLSHIT!!!Hell scientist can't even come to a concensus on the shroud of Turin after years of carbon dating.
The shroud of Turin was exposed as a fraud beyond redemption by a simple microscope!!!!!!
[
Carbon dating has been proven to be accurate within a 1% time frame by multiple sources. thats a scientific fact! it doesnt rely on some random story written and embellished by man a few thousand years ago.
A microscope is not used in carbon dating.BULLSHIT!!!Hell scientist can't even come to a concensus on the shroud of Turin after years of carbon dating.
The shroud of Turin was exposed as a fraud beyond redemption by a simple microscope!!!!!!
Carbon 14 dating in 1988 did not prove that the Turin Shroud was medieval. Carbon 14 dating only proved that what was tested, on average, was medieval. New studies conducted between 2001 and 2008 demonstrate that what was tested was chemically different than the rest of the cloth. Splices and the presence of dyestuff and cotton fibers suggest that the carbon 14 samples were taken from a medieval repair patch to the cloth. Furthermore, recent analysis of Lignin Decomposition Kinetics shows that the cloth is at least twice as old as the carbon 14 estimates. The results of these studies are reported in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Thermochimica Acta in a paper by the late Raymond N. Rogers, a Fellow of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of California (See: Volume 425 pp. 189-194) and Chemistry Today (Vol 26, Num 4, Jul/Aug 2008), Discrepancies in the radiocarbon dating area of the Turin shroud, Benford M.S., Marino J.G.
[
Carbon dating has been proven to be accurate within a 1% time frame by multiple sources. thats a scientific fact! it doesnt rely on some random story written and embellished by man a few thousand years ago.
Carbon dating, like all radioactive dating, is flawed because it assumes that carbon decays the same rate today that it did 200 years ago, 1000 years ago, 10,000 years ago, etc.
You can't rely on those assumptions. Circumstances in nature may be very different than t hey were 500 years ago, or 1000 years ago or even longer.
You can hypothesize. You can make educated guesses. You can even rely on those. But until you can prove your assumptions, which unless you've developed time travel, you can't. You are just making guesses.
The problem with people who try to use science to attack faith is they refuse to admit the very real limits science has and it's purpose as a tool to help us understand the world around us.
They also have a tendency to ignore all evidence they don't like. Funny how that works.
as for how old the earth is? I don't know. I haven't asked God about it. He hasnt told me. Frankly it's not one of my more pressing matters with Him.
I really wish people would look at reality instead of insisting that they know everything based on their own assumptions.
