45% of Democrats back Muslim immigration ban

Well Fox provide the methodology, you can analyse that for us if you wish?

Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
The terrorists have already defeated you. Sorry to see you go.
They've defeated you. You want to help them by flooding your country with their brethren and who knows how many ready made jihadis. Isis loves liberals.
Lol. You bedwetting pussy. Do you have any brown neighbors? You should probably be spying on them then. For your country's sake.
I see the 14 that got gunned down the other week, gave you some blood to put on your hands. Congradulations ! Now mind your own business with Christians.
 
Shame on the 45%. Of course, it is a Faux News poll. Who knows what the actual numbers are.
No, its true. Why let more in?

You want to let some refuges in? Sure why not. But I don't know why we need more Pakistani, Afghanistan, Saudi, Syria, Iran, Iraq, or Somalian Muslims coming to America.

Can as many people that want come to America? So we give out visas? Why do we have to give visas to Turks? I think my Greek immigrant parents won a lotto. Not every Greek that wanted got to come to America.
Truth be told, before the republican pants shitting fest I was in favor of more regulation of refugees and immigration from the middle east. Thankfully their bed-wetting hysteria has reminded me that there are standards Americans should strive to live up to, and pissing yourself in terror isn't one of them.
So you want free unregulated trade and immigration? Are you a libertarian? Let the market decide.
 
Shame on the 45%. Of course, it is a Faux News poll. Who knows what the actual numbers are.
Well Fox provide the methodology, you can analyse that for us if you wish?

Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
 
Shame on the 45%. Of course, it is a Faux News poll. Who knows what the actual numbers are.
Well Fox provide the methodology, you can analyse that for us if you wish?

Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
 
Well Fox provide the methodology, you can analyse that for us if you wish?

Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
 
Well Fox provide the methodology, you can analyse that for us if you wish?

Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
 
Poll question:

Do you favor or oppose temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States until government officials can say with confidence they can identify those who are coming here to cause the country harm?



Ridiculous question. If they had asked "do you favor temporarily banning Muslims who are not U.S. citizens from entering the United States" the results would have been a lot different. But they had to include the rest which is typical Faux News bias.
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
We already have gun control, works well doesn't it?
 
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
We already have gun control, works well doesn't it?
Now you're deflecting. Answering a question with a question. I'm just pointing out your limp risted hypocracy
 
you're right the vote is the most important thing to a politician
 
What's ridiculous is that terrorists can use our liberal ways against us. Can't spy because its unconstitutional. Bs. That should only be for American born citizens. You got to live here ten years before we stop spying. And we don't want to know about it.

I don't know what liberals are hoping for by letting more in.

Oh, and in Michigan all the Republicans have bent over on this because we have millions of Muslim voters. Political correctness is going to get people killed.

Just stop letting anyone new in. Or just Australians and Canadians.
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
We already have gun control, works well doesn't it?
I agree why let more Arab men and women from the middle East come here? We must need more people. Lol
 
you're right the vote is the most important thing to a politician
This is why they hype guys like Ben carson Cruz and trump early. Or carli for the white women. They rally the crazies. And hopefully they got them so fired up those people will show up for Jeb rubio Christie or kasich. The more moderate Republicans.
 
Political correctness already got 14 killed just over a week ago. Thanks to liberals.
You mean when an American born conservative religious person bought guns in a straw purchase and murdered people with them?
Most of the american mass shooters come out to be Looney liberals. Nice try to deflect though. You also proved your support for Muslim terrorist, by deflecting.
So the shooter shouldn't have had those guns? You're for gun control now too? What reason would you give for denying him that arsenal?
We already have gun control, works well doesn't it?
Now you're deflecting. Answering a question with a question. I'm just pointing out your limp risted hypocracy
So we don't have gun control?
 
Other countries have put the brakes on the refugees resettlement. It is about security. There are many ways to help the refugees beside letting them immigrate.
If you are sick or injured, it can be at times impossible to care for an infant. If a country is being attacked from within, like a virus, it does not have the strength to care for the refugees.
The people want better vetting and to put a temporary hold on letting people into the country. Security of the US has to come first. The first job of a government should be to protect a country. We also have to have the resources to provide aid. Right not we are trillions in debt. We can't pay our own bills, how can we pay for the support of so many refugees? We can give of our time and share what we have by donating to charities and NGOs that help the refugees. It is not up to our government to pay for the whole world with money we don't have.

Refugees should be kept as close as possible to their homeland to make it easy for them to return and rebuild their homes and country. Moving them half way around the world is not the answer.
There's a problem in providing just aid to refugees. No one wants them. Look at Europe, they are overrun with refugees. If no country wants them, then they end up in refugee camps which become training grounds for terrorist and criminals.
What do you suggest then?
Over the last 2 years, the UN has referred 22,000 Syrian refugees to the the US. Of those approximately 2,100 have been accepted lest than 10% of those that applied. The vast majority are women and children under the age 18. Obama has called for upping the number to approximately 1500 a year. I don't see any problem with this. There are somewhere between 3 and 7 million Muslims living in the US and we have more 10 million Muslim visitors the US each year. I seriously doubt that another 1500 women and children a year is going have any effect on the number of terrorist attacks a year (2 in 2015 down from 5 in 2014).
How do you know it's actually women and children? And aren't you concerned that the head of the FBI said they cannot be vetted properly? You can't vet people from a war zone, even less so when it's a country that's been in turmoil for years. I don't see what's wrong with Arabic/Muslim countries taking them. Better for everyone, imho.
It's pretty easy to spot women and children in an immigration interview. Last year we had over 100,000 immigrants from predominately Muslim countries and over 10 million Muslim visitors, any one of them could be an Islamic terrorist. Their screening which takes an average of less than 3 weeks to process amounts to running through a terrorist watch list. The FBI said screening a Syrian refugee would take an average of 18 to 24 months!

Most of the refugees are going to countries in the region. 2.1 million Syrians registered by UNHCR in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon, 1.9 million Syrians registered by the Government of Turkey, as well as more than 26,700 Syrian refugees registered in North Africa.

UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response
Of course it's easy to spot women and children in immigration interviews. Are you conducting these immigration interviews?
 
There's a problem in providing just aid to refugees. No one wants them. Look at Europe, they are overrun with refugees. If no country wants them, then they end up in refugee camps which become training grounds for terrorist and criminals.
What do you suggest then?
Over the last 2 years, the UN has referred 22,000 Syrian refugees to the the US. Of those approximately 2,100 have been accepted lest than 10% of those that applied. The vast majority are women and children under the age 18. Obama has called for upping the number to approximately 1500 a year. I don't see any problem with this. There are somewhere between 3 and 7 million Muslims living in the US and we have more 10 million Muslim visitors the US each year. I seriously doubt that another 1500 women and children a year is going have any effect on the number of terrorist attacks a year (2 in 2015 down from 5 in 2014).
How do you know it's actually women and children? And aren't you concerned that the head of the FBI said they cannot be vetted properly? You can't vet people from a war zone, even less so when it's a country that's been in turmoil for years. I don't see what's wrong with Arabic/Muslim countries taking them. Better for everyone, imho.
It's pretty easy to spot women and children in an immigration interview. Last year we had over 100,000 immigrants from predominately Muslim countries and over 10 million Muslim visitors, any one of them could be an Islamic terrorist. Their screening which takes an average of less than 3 weeks to process amounts to running through a terrorist watch list. The FBI said screening a Syrian refugee would take an average of 18 to 24 months!

Most of the refugees are going to countries in the region. 2.1 million Syrians registered by UNHCR in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon, 1.9 million Syrians registered by the Government of Turkey, as well as more than 26,700 Syrian refugees registered in North Africa.

UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response
Of course it's easy to spot women and children in immigration interviews. Are you conducting these immigration interviews?
Initial interviews are conducted by UNHCR. Those selected to be referred to US immigration would complete an application with immigration and at least one interview would be scheduled. Considering the process would take 18 to 24 months, there would be probably more interviews plus investigations.
Sex and age is not a criteria for selection so the applicant has no reason to lie. The fact is most refugees are women and children. There is nothing written in stone that a terrorist can't be a women or a child, just the probability is a lot less.
 
Last edited:
Unless of course they are pulling a marriage or relatives visa - then you get fast tracked and have limited investigations (and I believe it's less than a year wait.)

Jihad weddings for all >.<
 

Forum List

Back
Top