51% of GOP now accept anthropogenic global warming

[bedowin62]

the whole man-made AGW theory is far from concluded and is a myth
libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[RollingThunder]

the whole man-made AGW theory is far from concluded and is a myth
libs are losers who lie to themselves

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

 

[sealybobo]

Facts: libs are useful dupes for the worlds biggest wealth redistribution scam

Really stupid? because while they were crying that libs wanted to take the rich people's money and distribute it, the rich now own more wealth than ever before. So yes class warfare does exist. It is them who are waging it on us. Either you are rich or stupid. Goodnight ****.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

FACTS: manmade global warming is real and you're a retarded nutjob.

How do you explain the temperature increase on Mars?

Don't have to, 'cause there has been no temperature increase on Mars. You've fallen for another propaganda myth that has no substance.

Global warming on Mars?
Dr. Steinn Sigurðsson
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa

Melting ice caps on Earth = Global Warming

Melting ice caps on Mars = Denier!!

 

[bedowin62]

Facts: libs are useful dupes for the worlds biggest wealth redistribution scam

Really stupid? because while they were crying that libs wanted to take the rich people's money and distribute it, the rich now own more wealth than ever before. So yes class warfare does exist. It is them who are waging it on us. Either you are rich or stupid. Goodnight ****.

awwww; a left-wing loser is angry?

lol idiot; you seem to be forgetting something you mindless moron; YOU LEFT-WINGERS ARE IN CHARGE

we're in the EIGHTH-STRAIGHT YEAR of Progressive majority rule
the rich are getting richer and that is TRUE LEFTARD
and it's happening ON YOUR WATCH.
just because you left-wing nutjobs cant find your ass with both hands; no reason to get all angry and blame the rich leftard

petty jealousy because you cant admit your agenda has failed and caused more of exactly what you were trying to avoid?Z

yup

good night "****"

 

[RollingThunder]

How do you explain the temperature increase on Mars?

Don't have to, 'cause there has been no temperature increase on Mars. You've fallen for another propaganda myth that has no substance.

Global warming on Mars?
Dr. Steinn Sigurðsson
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa

Melting ice caps on Earth = Global Warming

Melting ice caps on Mars = Denier!!

Not surprising that you are too stupid to understand, CrazyFruitcake, but at least you're finally admitting the reality of the melting ice caps on Earth.

There is no pattern of melting ice caps on Mars. All you have are delusional denier cult myths but no evidence to back them up.

 

[Iceweasel]

FACTS: manmade global warming is real and you're a retarded nutjob.

How do you explain the temperature increase on Mars?

Don't have to, 'cause there has been no temperature increase on Mars. You've fallen for another propaganda myth that has no substance.

Global warming on Mars?
Dr. Steinn Sigurðsson
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa

I'll raise you by bringing in NASA.

NASA - A Gloomy Mars Warms Up
For the past 30 years, NASA scientists have been using high-tech satellite equipment to study features on the face of Mars. It appears a slight change in the planet’s surface luster has caused its temperature to rise.

 

[Iceweasel]

the whole man-made AGW theory is far from concluded and is a myth
libs are losers who lie to themselves

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

 

[Old Rocks]

Algore got rich off the Global Warming Scam and so can YOU!

Is it real or is it imagined?

Who gives a rat's ass so long as there's money to be made off it!

The same corporations that are denying GW because they don't want to have to pay for it are already buying up all the solar and wind companies so when they can no longer lie they will then make the $

you dolt; china and india are responsible for more global warming than our companies are; why do you you expect them to have to "lie" or expect them to sign onto agreements that WONT HELP THE PLANET but will KILL JOBS IN AMERICA?

No, stupid ass, China and India are not responsible for most of the warming and most of the excess GHGs in the atmsophere. The US and EU are, even though China is now putting out more GHGs than anybody else, they are a latecomer to the party. Most of the 120 ppm over the normal interglacial is a result of industry in the US and the EU.

We have the techinical capability to switch to non-polluting energy sources in a generation, and it will create jobs, not kill them. But we will not until there is a large enough catastrophe that it is imperative. Then knownothing assholes like you are going to screaming at the top of their lungs that the scientists never told them it was going to be a problem.

 

[Old Rocks]

the whole man-made AGW theory is far from concluded and is a myth
libs are losers who lie to themselves

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

OK, dumb fuck, name a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not real, and poses no danger. Just one, even in Outer Slobovia. How about a National Academy of Science, again, even that of Outer Slobovia. Or a major University.

You cannot because there are none. Just a bunch of willfully ignorant idiots like you.

 

[jc456]

The same corporations that are denying GW because they don't want to have to pay for it are already buying up all the solar and wind companies so when they can no longer lie they will then make the $

you dolt; china and india are responsible for more global warming than our companies are; why do you you expect them to have to "lie" or expect them to sign onto agreements that WONT HELP THE PLANET but will KILL JOBS IN AMERICA?

No, stupid ass, China and India are not responsible for most of the warming and most of the excess GHGs in the atmsophere. The US and EU are, even though China is now putting out more GHGs than anybody else, they are a latecomer to the party. Most of the 120 ppm over the normal interglacial is a result of industry in the US and the EU.

We have the techinical capability to switch to non-polluting energy sources in a generation, and it will create jobs, not kill them. But we will not until there is a large enough catastrophe that it is imperative. Then knownothing assholes like you are going to screaming at the top of their lungs that the scientists never told them it was going to be a problem.

So again, just where is that evidence of 120PPM of CO2 drives temperatures? hahahahahahaha you're still running into that brick wall eh?

 

[RollingThunder]

How do you explain the temperature increase on Mars?

Don't have to, 'cause there has been no temperature increase on Mars. You've fallen for another propaganda myth that has no substance.

Global warming on Mars?
Dr. Steinn Sigurðsson
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa

I'll raise you by bringing in NASA.

NASA - A Gloomy Mars Warms Up
For the past 30 years, NASA scientists have been using high-tech satellite equipment to study features on the face of Mars. It appears a slight change in the planet’s surface luster has caused its temperature to rise.

You'll "raise me" with an article about how changes in Mars's albedo caused by dust storms may be causing slight temperature changes? LOL. You are an incredibly stupid and probably insane little denier cultist. That article does not in any way support the denier cult myth that a non-existent increase in solar output is warming all of the planets. Instead the very first line of that article, which you quoted but obviously didn't understand, says:
"For the past 30 years, NASA scientists have been using high-tech satellite equipment to study features on the face of Mars. It appears a slight change in the planet’s surface luster has caused its temperature to rise.".

Right there, it attributes some small observed temperature changes to slight changes in the surface albedo, NOT solar irradiance. Way to shoot yourself in the foot, retard.

It goes on to say:
"They discovered that a wind-whipped, dusty surface has a measurable effect on the amount of sunlight that is reflected by the planet. The results of this research show that an increase in darkened surface areas may account for a one degree Fahrenheit rise in the surface air temperature of the planet. “We know that warmer temperatures and increased wind strengths are near the darkened areas where less sunlight is reflected by the surface, and cooler temperatures and weakened winds generally correspond to brightened areas” explained Lori Fenton, the experiment’s principal investigator at NASA Ames Research Center, in California's Silicon Valley. “What we don’t understand is how these changes in the planet’s brightness affect the martian climate.” “Albedo” is the technical term for a planet’s ability to reflect sunlight. According to scientists, variations in the planet’s albedo are generally attributed to changes in distribution of dust on the surface. Research indicates that as the dark areas on Mars expand and darken over time, its albedo decreases, and its surface air temperature rise."

In short, the NASA article has nothing to do with the warming and climate changes that are currently happening on Earth. I'd be curious to know what denier cult blog misinformed you about the meaning of that article. You obviously didn't read it or else you're just too stupid to understand it.

 

[RollingThunder]

the whole man-made AGW theory is far from concluded and is a myth
libs are losers who lie to themselves

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

No little retard, that's the online equivalent of kicking another delusional denier cult retard's butt to the curb over an incredibly stupid remark. Like I just did with you over your moronic attempt to use a NASA quote that didn't actually support your idiotic myths.

 

[jc456]

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

No little retard, that's the online equivalent of kicking another delusional denier cult retard's butt to the curb over an incredibly stupid remark. Like I just did with you over your moronic attempt to use a NASA quote that didn't actually support your idiotic myths.

and evidence, you have none.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

OK, dumb fuck, name a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not real, and poses no danger. Just one, even in Outer Slobovia. How about a National Academy of Science, again, even that of Outer Slobovia. Or a major University.

You cannot because there are none. Just a bunch of willfully ignorant idiots like you.

East Angelia, remember them?

BBC - Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming

Phil Jones: Yes...

BBC: Do you agree that from January 2002 to the present there has been statistically significant global cooling?

Phil Jones No. This period is even shorter than 1995-2009. The trend this time is negative (-0.12C per decade)

 

[RollingThunder]

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

No little retard, that's the online equivalent of kicking another delusional denier cult retard's butt to the curb over an incredibly stupid remark. Like I just did with you over your moronic attempt to use a NASA quote that didn't actually support your idiotic myths.

and evidence, you have none.

And evidence, you have been shown tons of it and you still moronically deny that it exists. Like in my post #54 on this thread...

FACTS: manmade global warming is real and you're a retarded nutjob.

Well a nice experment proving that would be very influential in getting agreement on this and any message board. So I assume with that rant you have one?

There's an enormous amount of evidence supporting the effect of increased CO2 on temperatures. You just refuse to look at it because you're either a delusional brainwashed retard and the abundant evidence would disturb your blind allegiance to the crackpot myths of your cult of reality denial...OR...because you're a professional troll who is getting paid by the post to spread misinformation and anti-science denial.

Papers on laboratory measurements of CO2 absorption properties
AGW Observer
by Ari Jokimäki
September 25, 2009
This is a list of papers on laboratory measurements of the absorption properties of carbon dioxide. In the context of these paperlists, this is a difficult subject because only few of the papers are freely available online, so we have to settle on abstracts only (of course, interested reader can purchase the full texts for the papers from the linked abstract pages). However, I don’t think that matters that much because the main point of this list really is to show that the basic research on the subject exists. The list is not complete, and will most likely be updated in the future in order to make it more thorough and more representative.

UPDATE (September 23, 2012): Burch & Gryvnak (1966) added.
UPDATE (February 6, 2011): Miller & Watts (1984) added.
UPDATE (July 25, 2010): I modified the introduction paragraph a little to reflect the current content of the list. The old text was a little outdated.
UPDATE (June 22, 2010): Lecher & Pernter (1881) added.
UPDATE (March 31, 2010): Tubbs & Williams (1972), Rubens & Aschkinass (1898 ) and Ångström (1900) added.
UPDATE (March 6, 2010): Barker (1922) added.
UPDATE (November 19, 2009): Predoi-Cross et al. (2007) added.
UPDATE (September 25, 2009): Miller & Brown (2004) added.

Spectroscopic database of CO2 line parameters: 4300–7000 cm−1 – Toth et al. (2008 ) “A new spectroscopic database for carbon dioxide in the near infrared is presented to support remote sensing of the terrestrial planets (Mars, Venus and the Earth). The compilation contains over 28,500 transitions of 210 bands from 4300 to 7000 cm−1…”

Line shape parameters measurement and computations for self-broadened carbon dioxide transitions in the 30012 ← 00001 and 30013 ← 00001 bands, line mixing, and speed dependence – Predoi-Cross et al. (2007) “Transitions of pure carbon dioxide have been measured using a Fourier transform spectrometer in the 30012 ← 00001 and 30013 ← 00001 vibrational bands. The room temperature spectra, recorded at a resolution of 0.008 cm−1, were analyzed using the Voigt model and a Speed Dependent Voigt line shape model that includes a pressure dependent narrowing parameter. Intensities, self-induced pressure broadening, shifts, and weak line mixing coefficients are determined. The results obtained are consistent with other studies in addition to the theoretically calculated values.” [Full text]

Spectroscopic challenges for high accuracy retrievals of atmospheric CO2 and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) experiment – Miller et al. (2005) “The space-based Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission will achieve global measurements needed to distinguish spatial and temporal gradients in the CO2 column. Scheduled by NASA to launch in 2008, the instrument will obtain averaged dry air mole fraction (XCO2) with a precision of 1 part per million (0.3%) in order to quantify the variation of CO2 sources and sinks and to improve future climate forecasts. Retrievals of XCO2 from ground-based measurements require even higher precisions to validate the satellite data and link them accurately and without bias to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) standard for atmospheric CO2 observations. These retrievals will require CO2 spectroscopic parameters with unprecedented accuracy. Here we present the experimental and data analysis methods implemented in laboratory studies in order to achieve this challenging goal.”

Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide I. 16O12C16O line positions – Miller & Brown (2004) “High-resolution near-infrared (4000–9000 cm-1) spectra of carbon dioxide have been recorded using the McMath–Pierce Fourier transform spectrometer at the Kitt Peak National Solar Observatory. Some 2500 observed positions have been used to determine spectroscopic constants for 53 different vibrational states of the 16O12C16O isotopologue, including eight vibrational states for which laboratory spectra have not previously been reported. … This work reduces CO2 near-infrared line position uncertainties by a factor of 10 or more compared to the 2000 HITRAN line list, which has not been modified since the comprehensive work of Rothman et al. [J. Quant. Spectrosc. Rad. Transfer 48 (1992) 537].” [Full text]

Spectra calculations in central and wing regions of CO2 IR bands between 10 and 20 μm. I: model and laboratory measurements – Niro et al. (2004) “Temperature (200–300 K) and pressure (70–200 atm) dependent laboratory measurements of infrared transmission by CO2–N2 mixtures have been made. From these experiments the absorption coefficient is reconstructed, over a range of several orders of magnitude, between 600 and 1000 cm−1.”

Collisional effects on spectral line-shapes – Boulet (2004) “The growing concern of mankind for the understanding and preserving of its environment has stimulated great interest for the study of planetary atmospheres and, first of all, for that of the Earth. Onboard spectrometers now provide more and more precise information on the transmission and emission of radiation by these atmospheres. Its treatment by ‘retrieval’ technics, in order to extract vertical profiles (pressure, temperature, volume mixing ratios) requires precise modeling of infrared absorption spectra. Within this framework, accounting for the influence of pressure on the absorption shape is crucial. These effects of inter-molecular collisions between the optically active species and the ‘perturbers’ are complex and of various types depending mostly on the density of perturbers. The present paper attempts to review and illustrate, through a few examples, the state of the art in this field.”

On far-wing Raman profiles by CO2 – Benech et al. (2002) “Despite the excellent agreement observed in N2 here, a substantial inconsistency between theory and experiment was found in the wing of the spectrum. Although the influence of other missing processes or neighboring bands cannot be totally excluded, our findings rather suggest that highly anisotropic perturbers, such as CO2, are improperly described when they are handled as point-like molecules, a cornerstone hypothesis in the approach employed.”

Collision-induced scattering in CO2 gas – Teboul et al. (1995) “Carbon-dioxide gas rototranslational scattering has been measured at 294.5 K in the frequency range 10–1000 cm−1 at 23 amagat. The depolarization ratio of scattered intensities in the frequency range 10–1000 cm−1 is recorded. The theoretical and experimental spectra in the frequency range 10–470 cm−1 are compared.”

The HITRAN database: 1986 edition – Rothman et al. (1987) “A description and summary of the latest edition of the AFGL HITRAN molecular absorption parameters database are presented. This new database combines the information for the seven principal atmospheric absorbers and twenty-one additional molecular species previously contained on the AFGL atmospheric absorption line parameter compilation and on the trace gas compilation.”

Rotational structure in the infrared spectra of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide dimers – Miller & Watts (1984 ) “High-resolution infrared predissociation spectra have been measured for dilute mixtures of CO2 and N2O in helium. Rotational fine structure is clearly resolved for both (CO2)2 and (N2O)2, the linewidths being instrument-limited. This establishes that predissociation lifetimes are longer than approximately 50 ns.”

Broadening of Infrared Absorption Lines at Reduced Temperatures: Carbon Dioxide – Tubbs & Williams (1972) “An evacuated high-resolution Czerny-Turner spectrograph, which is described in this paper, has been used to determine the strengths S and self-broadening parameters γ0 for lines in the R branch of the ν3 fundamental of 12C16O2 at 298 and at 207 K. The values of γ0 at 207 K are greater than those to be expected on the basis of a fixed collision cross section σ.”

Investigation of the Absorption of Infrared Radiation by Atmospheric Gases – Burch et al. (1970) “From spectral transmittance curves of very large samples of CO2 we have determined coefficients for intrinsic absorption and pressure-induced absorption from approximately 1130/cm to 1835/cm.”

Absorption of Infrared Radiant Energy by CO2 and H2O. IV. Shapes of Collision-Broadened CO2 Lines – Burch et al. (1969) “The shapes of the extreme wings of self-broadened CO2 lines have been investigated in three spectral regions near 7000, 3800, and 2400 cm−1. … New information has been obtained about the shapes of self-broadened CO2 lines as well as CO2 lines broadened by N2, O2, Ar, He, and H2.”

High-Temperature Spectral Emissivities and Total Intensities of the 15-µ Band System of CO2 – Ludwig et al. (1966) “Spectral-emissivity measurements of the 15-µ band of CO2 were made in the temperature range from 1000° to 2300°K.”

Laboratory investigation of the absorption and emission of infrared radiation – Burch & Gryvnak (1966) “Extensive measurements of the absorption by H2O and CO2 have been made in the region from 0·6 to 5·5 microm. Two different multiple-pass absorption cells provided path lengths from 2 to 933 m, and sample pressures were varied from a few μHg to 15 atm. Approximately thirty new CO2 bands were observed and identified, and the strengths of the important bands determined. The H2O data provide enough information for the determination of the strengths and widths of several hundred of the more important lines. The wings of CO2absorption lines were found to be sub-Lorentzian, with the shapes depending on temperature, broadening gas, and wavelength in ways which cannot be explained by present theories. The absorption by H2O and CO2 samples at temperatures up to 1800°K has been studied from 1 to 5 microm. The transmission of radiation from hot CO2 through cold CO2 and from hot H2O through cold H2O has been investigated to determine the effect of the coincidence of emission lines with absorption lines.” Darrell E. Burch, David A. Gryvnak, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Volume 6, Issue 3, May–June 1966, Pages 229–240, Redirecting.

Line shape in the wing beyond the band head of the 4·3 μ band of CO2 – Winters et al. (1964) “Quantitative absorpance measurements have been made in pure CO2 and mixtures of CO2 with N2 and O2 in a 10 m White Perkin-Elmer cell. With absorbing paths up to 50 m-atm, results have been obtained from the band head at 2397 cm−1 to 2575 cm−1.”

Emissivity of Carbon Dioxide at 4.3 µ – Davies (1964) “The emissivity of carbon dioxide has been measured for temperatures from 1500° to 3000°K over the wavelength range from 4.40 to 5.30 µ.”

Absorption Line Broadening in the Infrared – Burch et al. (1962) “The effects of various gases on the absorption bands of nitrous oxide, carbon monoxide, methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor have been investigated.”

Total Absorptance of Carbon Dioxide in the Infrared – Burch et al. (1962) “Total absorptance… has been determined as a function of absorber concentration w and equivalent pressure Pe for the major infrared absorption bands of carbon dioxide with centers at 3716, 3609, 2350, 1064, and 961 cm−1.”

Rotation-Vibration Spectra of Diatomic and Simple Polyatomic Molecules with Long Absorbing Paths – Herzberg & Herzberg (1953) “The spectrum of CO2 in the photographic infrared has been studied with absorbing paths up to 5500 m. Thirteen absorption bands were found of which eleven have been analyzed in detail.”

The Infrared Absorption Spectrum of Carbon Dioxide – Martin & Barker (1932) “The complete infrared spectrum of CO2 may consistently be explained in terms of a linear symmetrical model, making use of the selection rules developed by Dennison and the resonance interaction introduced by Fermi. The inactive fundamental ν1 appears only in combination bands, but ν2 at 15μ and ν3 at 4.3μ absorb intensely.”

Carbon Dioxide Absorption in the Near Infra-Red – Barker (1922) “Infra-red absorption bands of CO2 at 2.7 and 4.3 μ. – New absorption curves have been obtained, using a special prism-grating double spectrometer of higher resolution (Figs. 1-3). The 2.7 μ region, heretofore considered to be a doublet, proves to be a pair of doublets, with centers at approximately 2.694 μ and 2.767 μ. The 4.3 μ band appears as a single doublet with center at 4.253 μ. The frequency difference between maxima is nearly the same for each of the three doublets, and equal to 4.5 x 1011. Complete resolution of the band series was not effected, even though the slit included only 12 A for the 2.7 μ region, but there is evidently a complicated structure, with a “head” in each case on the side of shorter wave-lengths. The existence of this head for the 4.3 μ band is also indicated by a comparison with the emission spectrum from a bunsen flame, and the difference in wave-length of the maxima of emission and absorption is explained as a temperature effect similar to that observed with other doublets.” [For free full text, click PDF or GIF links in the linked abstract page]

Ueber die Bedeutung des Wasserdampfes und der Kohlensäure bei der Absorption der Erdatmosphäre – Ångström (1900)

Observations on the Absorption and Emission of Aqueous Vapor and Carbon Dioxide in the Infra-Red Spectrum – Rubens & Aschkinass (1898) “Our experiments carried out as described above on the absorption spectrum carbon dioxide very soon showed that we were dealing with a single absorption band whose maximum lies near λ = 14.7 μ. … The whole region of absorption is limited to the interval from 12.5 μ to 16 μ, with the maximum at 14.7 μ.” [For free full text, click PDF or GIF links in the linked abstract page]

On the absorption of dark heat-rays by gases and vapours – Lecher & Pernter (1881) Svante Arrhenius wrote in his famous 1897 paper: “Tyndall held the opinion that the water-vapour has the greatest influence, whilst other authors, for instance Lecher and Pernter, are inclined to think that the carbonic acid plays the more important part.”.

The Bakerian Lecture – On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connexion of Radiation, Absorption, and Conduction – Tyndall (1861) 150 years ago John Tyndall already showed that carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation. [Full text] [Wikipedia: John Tyndall]

Closely related

The HITRAN Database – The laboratory work results on the absorption properties of carbon dioxide (and many other molecules) is contained in this database.

Would you like some more "evidence", little retard?

CO2 absorption of infrared (IR), theory:

* Kouzov, A. P., & Chrysos, M. (2009). Collision-induced absorption by CO 2 in the far infrared: Analysis of leading-order moments and interpretation of the experiment. Physical Review A, 80(4), 042703.

* Chrysos, M., Kouzov, A. P., Egorova, N. I., & Rachet, F. (2008 ). Exact Low-Order Classical Moments in Collision-Induced Bands by Linear Rotors: CO 2-CO 2. Physical review letters, 100(13), 133007.

* Buldyreva, J., & Chrysos, M. (2001). Semiclassical modeling of infrared pressure-broadened linewidths: A comparative analysis in CO2–Ar at various temperatures. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115(16), 7436-7441.

* Kratz, D. P., Gao, B. C., & Kiehl, J. T. (1991). A study of the radiative effects of the 9.4‐and 10.4‐micron bands of carbon dioxide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 96(D5), 9021-9026.

* Stull, V. R., Wyatt, P. J., & Plass, G. N. (1964). The infrared transmittance of carbon dioxide. Applied Optics, 3(2), 243-254.

CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements:

* R.A. Toth, et al., Spectroscopic database of CO2 line parameters: 4300–7000 cm−1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 109:6, April 2008, 906-921.

* Predoi-Cross, A., Unni, A. V., Liu, W., Schofield, I., Holladay, C., McKellar, A. R. W., & Hurtmans, D. (2007). Line shape parameters measurement and computations for self-broadened carbon dioxide transitions in the 30012← 00001 and 30013← 00001 bands, line mixing, and speed dependence. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 245(1), 34-51.

* Miller, C. E., & Brown, L. R. (2004). Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide I. 16 O 12 C 16 O line positions. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 228(2), 329-354.

* Niro, F., Boulet, C., & Hartmann, J. M. (2004). Spectra calculations in central and wing regions of CO 2 IR bands between 10 and 20μm. I: model and laboratory measurements. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88(4), 483-498.

* Benec'h, S., Rachet, F., Chrysos, M., Buldyreva, J., & Bonamy, L. (2002). On far‐wing Raman profiles by CO2. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 33(11‐12), 934-940.

Earth's upward emission of IR:

* Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M., & Wong, T. (2009). An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D17).

* Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth's global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(3).

* Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A., Lee III, R. B., Smith, G. L., Bush, K. A., & Willis, J. K. (2006). Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of the earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ERBS nonscanner WFOV data. Journal of Climate, 19(16).

* Harries, J. E. (2000). Physics of the Earth's radiative energy balance. Contemporary Physics, 41(5), 309-322.

* Kyle, H. L., Arking, A., Hickey, J. R., Ardanuy, P. E., Jacobowitz, H., Stowe, L. L., ... & Smith, G. L. (1993). The Nimbus Earth radiation budget (ERB) experiment: 1975 to 1992. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(5), 815-830.

* Barkstrom, B. R. (1984). The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 65(11), 1170-1185.

Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:

* Gastineau, G., Soden, B. J., Jackson, D. L., & O'Dell, C. W. (2014). Satellite-Based Reconstruction of the Tropical Oceanic Clear-Sky Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Comparison with Climate Models. Journal of Climate, 27(2).

* Chapman, D., Nguyen, P., & Halem, M. (2013, May). A decade of measured greenhouse forcings from AIRS. In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing (pp. 874313-874313). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

* Chen, C., Harries, J., Brindley, H., & Ringer, M. (2007). Spectral signatures of climate change in the Earth's infrared spectrum between 1970 and 2006. Retrieved October, 13, 2009.

* Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2007). Comparison of Spectrally Resolved Outgoing Longwave Radiation over the Tropical Pacific between 1970 and 2003 Using IRIS, IMG, and AIRS. Journal of climate, 20(15).

* Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2004, November). Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. In Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 164-174). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:

* Wang, K., & Liang, S. (2009). Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all‐sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D19).

* Wild, M., Grieser, J., & Schär, C. (2008 ). Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land‐based hydrological cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).

* Prata, F. (2008 ). The climatological record of clear‐sky longwave radiation at the Earth's surface: evidence for water vapour feedback?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17-18 ), 5247-5263.

* Allan, R. P. (2006). Variability in clear‐sky longwave radiative cooling of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22).

* Philipona, R., Dürr, B., Marty, C., Ohmura, A., & Wild, M. (2004). Radiative forcing‐measured at Earth's surface‐corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3).

Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:

* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger Causality Analyses for Climatic Attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515.

* Attanasio, A. (2012). Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110(1-2), 281-289.

* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2012). A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out‐of‐sample Granger causality analysis. Atmospheric Science Letters, 13(1), 67-72.

* Kodra, E., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011). Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature. Theoretical and applied climatology, 104(3-4), 325-335.

* Verdes, P. F. (2005). Assessing causality from multivariate time series. PHYSICAL REVIEW-SERIES E-, 72(2), 026222.

 

[mamooth]

And the bad news for the kooks keeps coming. Only 38% say they'd be willing to vote for a denier. Tough to win elections with those kinds of percentages.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2014/ClimatePollMemo.pdf

The poor Republicans are in a pickle. They can't win general elections with this stupidity, except in the redder states. But their base is so crazy, they can't win a primary unless they embrace the crazy.

 

[Iceweasel]

LOLOL.

With the world scientific community saying that mankind caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are, in fact, what is happening, your statement amounts to very insane, ideology-driven reality denial.

That's the online equivalent of slobbering all over your baby bib.

OK, dumb fuck, name a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not real, and poses no danger. Just one, even in Outer Slobovia. How about a National Academy of Science, again, even that of Outer Slobovia. Or a major University.

You cannot because there are none. Just a bunch of willfully ignorant idiots like you.

And bite the titty that feeds them? Are you serious? Answer the question genius, how is Mars warming? Could it be the .....sun? Gasp.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How big a dope do you have to be to USE REALLY BIG FONTS to post articles that don't answer the question?

 

[jc456]

No little retard, that's the online equivalent of kicking another delusional denier cult retard's butt to the curb over an incredibly stupid remark. Like I just did with you over your moronic attempt to use a NASA quote that didn't actually support your idiotic myths.

and evidence, you have none.

Well a nice experment proving that would be very influential in getting agreement on this and any message board. So I assume with that rant you have one?

There's an enormous amount of evidence supporting the effect of increased CO2 on temperatures. You just refuse to look at it because you're either a delusional brainwashed retard and the abundant evidence would disturb your blind allegiance to the crackpot myths of your cult of reality denial...OR...because you're a professional troll who is getting paid by the post to spread misinformation and anti-science denial.
* Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2004, November). Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. In Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 164-174). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:

* Wang, K., & Liang, S. (2009). Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all‐sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D19).

* Wild, M., Grieser, J., & Schär, C. (2008 ). Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land‐based hydrological cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).

* Prata, F. (2008 ). The climatological record of clear‐sky longwave radiation at the Earth's surface: evidence for water vapour feedback?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17-18 ), 5247-5263.

* Allan, R. P. (2006). Variability in clear‐sky longwave radiative cooling of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22).

* Philipona, R., Dürr, B., Marty, C., Ohmura, A., & Wild, M. (2004). Radiative forcing‐measured at Earth's surface‐corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3).

Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:

* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger Causality Analyses for Climatic Attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515.

* Attanasio, A. (2012). Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110(1-2), 281-289.

* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2012). A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out‐of‐sample Granger causality analysis. Atmospheric Science Letters, 13(1), 67-72.

* Kodra, E., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011). Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature. Theoretical and applied climatology, 104(3-4), 325-335.

* Verdes, P. F. (2005). Assessing causality from multivariate time series. PHYSICAL REVIEW-SERIES E-, 72(2), 026222.[

Granger Causality, interesting yet still statistical.

Defined: "Granger causality is a statistical concept of causality that is based on prediction. According to Granger causality, if a signal X1 "Granger-causes" (or "G-causes") a signal X2, then past values of X1 should contain information that helps predict X2 above and beyond the information contained in past values of X2 alone. Its mathematical formulation is based on linear regression modeling of stochastic processes (Granger 1969). More complex extensions to nonlinear cases exist, however these extensions are often more difficult to apply in practice."

So based on the mere fact that temperatures have not increased over the previous fifteen years as explained in the IPCC report, even the statistical Granger Causality is not proven. So we're back at you or yours providing some fundamental experimental evidence since CO2 did not drive climate for the past fifteen years, nor did it from 1940 to 1970. So, statistically speaking, this fails.