7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Faun]

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a fucking imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

LOLOL

You're such a rightard.

Try explaining how money given before December, 2014, was meant to influence an election that was scheduled IN December, 2014.......

So you believe it would be more effective to give the money after the election?

You're fucking nuts, con. No one suggested any such thing.

You just said it. You ridiculed the notion that giving the money before the election would be useful. That leaves after the election.

No I didn't. You freaks are simply fucking nuts.

I ridiculed the notion that giving money to an election no one knew was coming is rightarded logic at its finest.

Capiche?

 

[JonKoch]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

I don't speak for any other Liberals here, but I post purely for the entertainment value you rightards provide. Just as you are doing in this thread where you idiotically claim Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election no one knew would be held.

I'm certainly not here to educate you fools as I have learned a loooong time ago -- conservatives are ineducable.

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

So my black guy didn't explain it clearly enough for you?






.

You're even crazier than I gave you credit for if you think I'm gonna waste 7½ minutes of my life watching that video.

Sorry Fawn my apologies I forgot who I was talking too..

More your intellectual speed






.

 

[JonKoch]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

 

[Flash]

[QUO



Of course the Republicans today are not real conservatives any one younger then me never had a chance to vote for a real conservative , the last one we had was Reagan

.

I would like to agree with you but I don't share your same appreciation of Reagan. He talked a great Conservative game and he was a great leader and he was much better than any Democrat at the time (or any time). However, he grew the size of the Federal government, grew the welfare state and he increased the total tax burden on the American people. He also put us in debt about $ 2 trillion. That is not a Conservative.

He actually governed as a Liberal. You can thank the cost of a M-16 being $20,000 nowadays instead of only $25 more plus the $200 NFA fee of an AR-15 because of him signing the Hughes Amendment into law. .

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

EPA but Obama abused it and tried to destroy companies and small business


.

 

[rightwinger]

[QUO



Yup Obama was the epitome of number 6 in my OP


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personalfailing or a failure of the state?


.

There are many flaws with Liberalism but the inability to take personal responsibility is probably the greatest flaw in Liberalism. Those dumbasses think that the State should be responsibility for their well being, not themselves. They are willing to give up Liberty and prosperity for the false security of a welfare state because of their inability to take personal responsibility for their own well being. Despicable, isn't it?

Liberals not only take responsibility for themselves, but the rest of society

Conservatives only look out for themselves

 

[JonKoch]

They don't have ANY failing policies, they learn from real history, and do not repeat the devastating failures that liberals initiate.

LMAOROG

 

[Faun]

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

You trying to hard Fawn, again the question was about did Obama and his crew interfere in Israels election...


I provided enough evidence to convict Obama in the 9 circuit court.


You provided none to say he didn't.


.

Now you're lying. Clear confirmation even you know you lost the argument, even if you're not man enough to admit it.

As far as me not providing anything to disassemble your idiocy... to recap-- you claimed Obama funneled money in an election to overthrow Netanyahu and I used your own link to prove Obama gave the money before anyone knew there would even be an election.

This really upsets you doesn't it?

Did Obama meddle in the isreal elections?

That's the question and again I provided enough proof to convict Obama in the 9th circuit court..
.


You didn't prove nothing except being butt hurt



View attachment 127975

Why would your idiocy upset me? I think you're a moron. Your own posts confirm my suspicions. That doesn't anger me... it amuses me. Again, you claimed Obama gave money to thwart an election he didn't know about.

And that assertion is fucking hysterical, I don't care how rightarded you are.

 

[bripat9643]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

They were correct about staying out of WW I and WW II. They have always been correct about opposing socialist government boondoggles like Social Security, welfare and Medicare. They were correct about the folly of going off the gold standard, opposing the income tax and opposing the 17th Amendment.

 

[JonKoch]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

EPA but Obama abused it and tried to destroy companies and small business


.

WEIRD, RECORD US CORP PROFITS AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATES IN THE LOW TEENS? Obama did a horrible job trying to hurt Corps, longest jobs expansion on record WHILE cutting the deficit by $1 trillion

 

[Faun]

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

I don't speak for any other Liberals here, but I post purely for the entertainment value you rightards provide. Just as you are doing in this thread where you idiotically claim Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election no one knew would be held.

I'm certainly not here to educate you fools as I have learned a loooong time ago -- conservatives are ineducable.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

So my black guy didn't explain it clearly enough for you?






.

You're even crazier than I gave you credit for if you think I'm gonna waste 7½ minutes of my life watching that video.

Sorry Fawn my apologies I forgot who I was talking too..

More your intellectual speed






.

So that's what you watch??

 

[JonKoch]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

They were correct about staying out of WW I and WW II. They have always been correct about opposing socialist government boondoggles like Social Security, welfare and Medicare. They were correct about the folly of going off the gold standard, opposing the income tax and opposing the 17th Amendment.

So NOTHING were they on the correct side of US history, though I'm happy to see someone is being honest about them being isolationist during BOTH WW's

SS the best anti poverty program in the US? Keeps almost half of seniors out of poverty?? lol

Medicare? Oh right that thing that gets above 80% approval rating and costs 3% to administer...

 

[bripat9643]

[QUO



Yup Obama was the epitome of number 6 in my OP


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personalfailing or a failure of the state?


.

There are many flaws with Liberalism but the inability to take personal responsibility is probably the greatest flaw in Liberalism. Those dumbasses think that the State should be responsibility for their well being, not themselves. They are willing to give up Liberty and prosperity for the false security of a welfare state because of their inability to take personal responsibility for their own well being. Despicable, isn't it?

Liberals not only take responsibility for themselves, but the rest of society

Conservatives only look out for themselves

You mean liberals force everyone to fund their schemes to save humanity, and they never work.

The world would be a lot better off if everyone stuck to looking out for themselves.

 

[bripat9643]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

They were correct about staying out of WW I and WW II. They have always been correct about opposing socialist government boondoggles like Social Security, welfare and Medicare. They were correct about the folly of going off the gold standard, opposing the income tax and opposing the 17th Amendment.

So NOTHING were they on the correct side of US history, though I'm happy to see someone is being honest about them being isolationist during BOTH WW's

SS the best anti poverty program in the US? Keeps almost half of seniors out of poverty?? lol

Medicare? Oh right that thing that gets above 80% approval rating and costs 3% to administer...

Your claims are all leftwing propaganda and bullshit. everyone would be far wealthier when they retire if they had the 15% of their income the government takes to invest. Our GDP would have increased at a far greater rate if government hadn't pissed that money down the sewer.,

The idea that getting involved in WW I was a good idea was rejected by the entire country after the war. Any fool could see that taking sides in that mess was a foolish.

I could go on all day, but that's enough to show what a moron you are.

 

[Flash]

[QU

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

I am not a Republican so you are barking up the wrong tree there Sport. I gave up on the Republican Party being a party of real Conservatives a long time go. The Republicans are Democrat Light for the most part. They talk a good game but usually give us the same big fiscally irresponsible big welfare state government as the filthy ass Democrats. The distinction sounds great in a debate but once the Republicans get into office you can't tell them from the Democrats.

The policies of personal Liberty, personal responsibility, fiscal responsibility, appreciation of life, low taxation, limited government interference in our lives and rejection of the filthy ass welfare state are the core beliefs of Conservatives.

On the other hand the filthy ass greedy Libtards believe in state corresponded thievery. They are pretty much the scum of America. The Democrat Party is a coalition of a the despicable assholes in the country. The Negroes that vote their race and their welfare check, environmental wackos, anti gun nuts, welfare queens, illegals, Feminazis, confused college kids and their batshit crazy Marxists professors, socialist, queers, union thugs and abortionists.

 

[Flash]

They don't have ANY failing policies, they learn from real history, and do not repeat the devastating failures that liberals initiate.

LMAOROG

Only dumbass Moon Bats believe that it is better for a filthy ass bureaucrat, whose boss is a corrupt politician, elected by special interest groups is better at spending the money that they earned rather than themselves. Then they wonder why we ridicule them so much for being nitwits.

 

[Flash]

[Q


You mean liberals force everyone to fund their schemes to save humanity, and they never work.

The world would be a lot better off if everyone stuck to looking out for themselves.

The idea of personal responsibility and personal accountability are like worse ideas in the world for these Libtards.

They want somebody else to pay their bills for them. You know, for social justice reasons. They think they are entitled to have somebody else pay their bills simply because they are alive.

 

[JonKoch]

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Liberals do 'tax and spend' , but at least they balance the budget. Republicans did 'borrow and spend' and like Reagan and Bush, tripled and doubled the national debt. For people like you, it means they left debts three times, and two times the size they inherited.

Really? How did that go during the Obama administration?

Yep, Dubya inheriting 20% of GDP in revenues and spending while Obama inherited 14.6% of GDP in revenues and almost 24% in spending is Obama's fault *shaking head*

POLICIES THAT OBAMA PUT IN PLACE THAT CAUSED THE DEBT? HINT OBAMA LOWERED DUBYA'S FINAL F/Y DEFICIT BY 2/3RDS!

 

[rightwinger]

[QUO



Yup Obama was the epitome of number 6 in my OP


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personalfailing or a failure of the state?


.

There are many flaws with Liberalism but the inability to take personal responsibility is probably the greatest flaw in Liberalism. Those dumbasses think that the State should be responsibility for their well being, not themselves. They are willing to give up Liberty and prosperity for the false security of a welfare state because of their inability to take personal responsibility for their own well being. Despicable, isn't it?

Liberals not only take responsibility for themselves, but the rest of society

Conservatives only look out for themselves

You mean liberals force everyone to fund their schemes to save humanity, and they never work.

The world would be a lot better off if everyone stuck to looking out for themselves.

Seems to work to me....we have public education, take care of our handicapped, elderly and less fortunate

It is what modern societies do