JBG
Liberal democrat
It's warmed a lot since the winter of 1708-9.Earth's climate has been changing since long before humans ever appeared on it's surface. Now we find out from "scientists" that we've been the cause of it all along.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's warmed a lot since the winter of 1708-9.Earth's climate has been changing since long before humans ever appeared on it's surface. Now we find out from "scientists" that we've been the cause of it all along.
It's warmed a lot since the winter of 1708-9.
I picked it up during the freewheeling Napster era. Al Stewart has been a favorite of mine since Junior Year high school, in 1974. A friend with twice my IQ turned me on to him.OMG thanks! Great song, I'd not heard it before.
Robert, who is the highlighted person?Yup and breathe out Carbon Dioxide. We must be assholes to do this. I want to laugh. But his kind blame man and it makes me sad he is so anti human about climate.
I don't seem to have gotten a reply. Let's put this question out to the general audience here. Does anyone here believe that, across the entire world, there are more fat poor people than thin poor people?Morning Carl. Do you believe Dr Peterson when he says there are more fat poor people than thin poor people?
The last several large studies looked at research papers published in refereed journals. They were NOT self-selected.You didn't use big words, you engaged in the fallacy of excessive verbosity.
The "97%" were STILL self-selected, smug asshole.
I didn't write that material. I cut it and I pasted it. And every word was pertinent and on topic. So take your "excessive verbosity" and shove it up your uneducated ass.You didn't use big words, you engaged in the fallacy of excessive verbosity.
Here is the last entry in the surveys section of Wikipedia's article on the scientific consensus on climate change:The "97%" were STILL self-selected, smug asshole.
What you copy-pasted is the same old crap that you warmer cultist loons always copy-pasta...Just more of it.I didn't write that material. I cut it and I pasted it. And every word was pertinent and on topic. So take your "excessive verbosity" and shove it up your uneducated ass.
Here is the last entry in the surveys section of Wikipedia's article on the scientific consensus on climate change:
Also in 2021, a team led by Mark Lynas had found 80,000 climate-related studies published between 2012 and 2020, and chose to analyse a random subset of 3000. Four of these were skeptical of the human cause of climate change, 845 were endorsing the human cause perspective at different levels, and 1869 were indifferent to the question. The authors estimated the proportion of papers not skeptical of the human cause as 99.85% (95% confidence limit 99.62%–99.96%). Excluding papers which took no position on the human cause led to an estimate of the proportion of consensus papers as 99.53% (95% confidence limit 98.80%–99.87%). They confirmed their numbers by explicitly looking for alternative hypotheses in the entire dataset, which resulted in 28 papers.[7][85]
The numbers are not self selected. The papers surveyed were selected at random. The results are in EXCESS of 97% not skeptical of AGW. FOUR papers out of 3,000 expressed skepticism towards the human cause perspective.
97% is not a myth. It is an understatement.
Just saying it's crap doesn't mean shit. What you need is some evidence. Your problem is that there isn't any because these numbers are facts.What you copy-pasted is the same old crap that you warmer cultist loons always copy-pasta...Just more of it.
From your linkAnd your vaunted "97%" STILL self-selected, fucking liar....They're so embarrassed about getting caught at it, that they pulled the "study" from public vies.
I think you are asking about a general term .... kind. His kind.Robert, who is the highlighted person?
GW happens due to changes happening around the Planet. So who are the deniers?Just saying it's crap doesn't mean shit. What you need is some evidence. Your problem is that there isn't any because these numbers are facts.
From your link
The graphic below comes via our friends at skepticalscience, assuring us that while 97% of "climate scientists think that global warming is 'significantly' due to human activity," a shocking 72% of news coverage does not reflect this "consensus" and similarly 74% of the public are not convinced.
Here is the actual graphic from Skeptical Science
View attachment 880265
The Skeptical Science article examined the disconnect between what scientists actually believe, what the news reports and what the public thinks. There is no doubt that an overwhelming majority of climate scientists accept that the Earth is warming and that the primary cause is human GHG emissions.
Don't you find it a little embarrassing that with over 21 studies on the topic available for review, AGW deniers CONSISTENTLY single out a single, small scale study, done over twenty years ago, that statistically was completely valid? The problem is that the general public and, apparently AGW deniers in particular, are grossly unfamiliar with the tenets of statistical sampling. And then there's their propensity to just lie.
In your initial post you used the term "his kind" meaning people like this individual. I think we both know to whom you were referring. And earlier, you had asked me for examples. That's all.I think you are asking about a general term .... kind. His kind.
There are a range of them. Some deny that the world is getting warmer. Some deny that it is being caused by human GHG emissions. Some deny that the warming presents any threat or risk of harm. Many claim that it is a hoax propagated by liberals either seeking power, money, or the destruction of the modern world.GW happens due to changes happening around the Planet. So who are the deniers?
That was not what I look like when I'm upset Robert. Poster Ding might have a better idea. I don't actually mind people talking about me as long as they don't lie. A number of posters here frequently lie about me and what I have said or done here. I call THAT out when it happens.You got upset you were called out, but not by name.
Humans are responsible for AGW. It's what the A means.So here you are doubling down and blaming man again.
That wasn't huffy and what I was pointing out was you talking about me in the third person with others, something you seemed to claim you did not do.When it was pointed out you blame man, you got all huffy about it.
When his kind blames man for global climate, pardon me when I defend this man. I want to thank you for your kind reply.In your initial post you used the term "his kind" meaning people like this individual. I think we both know to whom you were referring. And earlier, you had asked me for examples. That's all.
Here is a poster acting very rude. But when I say his kind, well he brings it up.I didn't write that material. I cut it and I pasted it. And every word was pertinent and on topic. So take your "excessive verbosity" and shove it up your uneducated ass.
Here is a quote from Poster Oddball whom I was addressingHere is a poster acting very rude. But when I say his kind, well he brings it up.
What you copy-pasted is the same old crap that you warmer cultist loons always copy-pasta...Just more of it.
And your vaunted "97%" STILL self-selected, fucking liar....They're so embarrassed about getting caught at it, that they pulled the "study" from public vies.
There are a range of them. Some deny that the world is getting warmer. Some deny that it is being caused by human GHG emissions. Some deny that the warming presents any threat or risk of harm. Many claim that it is a hoax propagated by liberals either seeking power, money, or the destruction of the modern world.
YES. I would not even bring it up but for the complaint you have lodged involving me.Here is a quote from Poster Oddball whom I was addressing
Was it rude of poster Oddball to call me a "warmer cultist loon" and a "fucking liar"? Perhaps you could chat about that with one of the other posters.