Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,388
- 1,170
NO, it's not.....Torture is illegal in all 50 states.........And there is no proof that torture doesn't result in the info you need to save a life.....None whatsoever!What is YOUR answer?
That anyone's answer is irrelevant to US policy on legal interrogations.
There is no proof that torturing someone for info will result in the info you need to save a life, so it is a false premise as if it's a guarantee, also it would never occur to me to TORTURE anyone under those circumstances... And if I ever ended up breaking a law trying to get my child back I would plead my case before the court.
Personally, my twin daughters and son are my life........I would torture the piss out of somebody if that was all that was left to save their life, and take whatever punishment befell me......As long as they live, that's all that matters.
Now, why shouldn't we used enhanced interrogation to save american lives?
It's not illegal to deprive sleep, cause hunger, cause cold, subject to loud music, or use our version of waterboarding........Our version of waterboarding is the same used on our own troops......So, what the hell is the problem?
Contrary to Foxfyre's implications, other interrogation techniques were never mentioned as torture... NO ONE said terrorists shouldn't endure discomfort or "unpleasantries", as she put it... These other interrogation techniques have proven effective and legal.
fox said:The few who seem to be commenting--and I'm not going to say they are typical of ALL liberals/leftwingers--mostly seem to be saying that they would not use any form of discomfort or unpleasantry on a terrorist even if it meant their family would be brutally murdered