A detailed view on what ignorance will cost the human race

[BackAgain]

The solution to this is the solution to this, it is not an excuse to increase government authority, to beggar the nation or to restrict our freedoms. Use your fucking head.

The proposed solution. And the word “solution” is not very persuasive anyway. The use of the problem to cover a desire for socialism and similar social issues is illicit.

 

[skookerasbil]

The proposed solution. And the word “solution” is not very persuasive anyway. The use of the problem to cover a desire for socialism and similar social issues is illicit.

Yep....capitalism making a HUGE comeback this week.
The socialists and particularly the green bozos getting punched in the mouth....hard!
I have to admit....I'm laughing

 

[BackAgain]

The AGW Cult has never once show any statistically significant "warming" solely due to increasing CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM.

They also love to engage in a pretty obvious bit of spin. They can point to one thing (let’s call it overall climate warming) but they don’t call it that. They call it AGW. THEN, anyone who contests the “A” is accused of denying the “W.”

Obviously, if reliable data shows that the overall climate is warming, then opponents of the notion of “AGW” aren’t denying the warming. They are denying or challenging the contention that it is significantly or primarily caused by humankind and greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere by human industry.

That gets us back to Crusader Frank’s post. To the AGW faithful (it is more akin to a faith-based religion than it is to “science”), put up or shut up.

 

[Stryder50]

Manchin Objects to New Greenhouse Gas and Environmental Impact Policies on Natural Gas Pipelines​

...
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) February policy statements on interstate natural gas projects drew strong objections from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and the two FERC commissioners on the five-person panel who voted against the statements.

Those statements, which add consideration of greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts, including on “environmental justice communities,” for FERC to approve natural gas infrastructure, were the subject of a March 3 hearing of the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources (ENR).

While FERC had previously determined project need on the basis of contracts to ship the gas from a prospective pipeline, the first new policy statement adds factors to assess “need.” It also directs FERC to consider environmental impacts, landowner impacts, and impacts on “environmental justice communities,” among other factors.

The second statement presumes that a project emitting 100,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents has a significant impact on climate change, meaning that the project must undergo more extensive environmental review.

Manchin, who serves as ENR chair, testified that “the recent action taken by Democratic commissioners … served to elevate environmental considerations above American energy reliability, security, and independence.”

“To deny or put up barriers to natural gas projects and the benefits they provide, while Putin is actively and effectively using energy as an economic and political weapon against our allies, is just beyond the pale,” Manchin said.
...

Manchin Objects to New Greenhouse Gas and Environmental Impact Policies on Natural Gas Pipelines

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[BoSoxGal]

Hate to break it to you s0n.......but the past week has taken climate alarmism completely off the board as a public concern. Your shit is irrelevant right now. Watch what transpires in the coming weeks and months. Your "science" bs will be getting laughed at......almost unanimously.

That big glass pyramid in the background of your avatar just got nuked!


How does it feel?

That’s one very limited view.

Another view is that the actions of the madman Putin give the whole world incentive to speed the transition to renewable energy and finally give the great big FUCK YOU to the petrostate tyrants who have held the world’s nuts over the price of oil/gas.

In a world transitioned to renewables, we could get the warming under control and enjoy the fantastic bonus of being done with murdering twats like Putin, the Saudi royal family, the ayatollahs in Iran, etc. Let all those fuckers find some other was to make money in the sand and on the steppes.

 

[Crick]

THEN, anyone who contests the “A” is accused of denying the “W.”

Obviously, if reliable data shows that the overall climate is warming, then opponents of the notion of “AGW” aren’t denying the warming. They are denying or challenging the contention that it is significantly or primarily caused by humankind and greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere by human industry.

That gets us back to Crusader Frank’s post. To the AGW faithful (it is more akin to a faith-based religion than it is to “science”), put up or shut up.

You'll have to show me someone contesting anthropogenicity being accused of denying the warming.

As to the rest of your post, here:

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-07/climate-forcing-figure2-2016.png

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The solution to this is the solution to this, it is not an excuse to increase government authority, to beggar the nation or to restrict our freedoms. Use your fucking head.

That sounds like something Kamala would say

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That’s one very limited view.

Another view is that the actions of the madman Putin give the whole world incentive to speed the transition to renewable energy and finally give the great big FUCK YOU to the petrostate tyrants who have held the world’s nuts over the price of oil/gas.

In a world transitioned to renewables, we could get the warming under control and enjoy the fantastic bonus of being done with murdering twats like Putin, the Saudi royal family, the ayatollahs in Iran, etc. Let all those fuckers find some other was to make money in the sand and on the steppes.

WWIII or man madeup global climate warming change...tough call

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You'll have to show me someone contesting anthropogenicity being accused of denying the warming.

As to the rest of your post, here:

View attachment 610857

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-07/climate-forcing-figure2-2016.png

How can CO2 be both "long-lived" AND acidify the oceans?

Bizarre

It causes floods and fires and is "long-lived" but dissolves on contact with the oceans

It's a miracle molecule!

 

[BackAgain]

You'll have to show me someone contesting anthropogenicity being accused of denying the warming.

As to the rest of your post, here:

View attachment 610857

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-07/climate-forcing-figure2-2016.png

Oh please. Your label of “climate denier” almost universally gets slapped on anyone who challenges the validity of the AGW faith. By you? Probably. But by others of your faith? No question.

 

[skookerasbil]

You'll have to show me someone contesting anthropogenicity being accused of denying the warming.

As to the rest of your post, here:

View attachment 610857

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-07/climate-forcing-figure2-2016.png

My God....nobody is caring about this in March of 2022. Might as well be bantering about the social influences of disco music in 1978.

No serious person is debating climate change today.

The entire world concerned about one thing only:fossil fuels.