A great example of why socialism is better than "charity"

[Correll]

Only a socialist would pretend that all government is socialism.

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Without the road, economic activity is not possible, therefore, government is the driving force for that economic activity. That is the whole point. And that is why and how Socialism has always taken ownership of these key components that makes commerce possible. Not a very hard concept to understand.

Building a road, does not justify the government taking ownership of some business that might use the road.


That you actually try to claim it does, supports my point that you are a socialist.

 

[BWK]

To a lib, being sensitive about a protected class person's feelings is more important that protecting women from rape.

Says who? You? One subject has zero to do with the other. Right wingers are cowards because they are unable to engage the subject intelligently with any counter biological arguments. So they stick with hate and other distractions.You people are so damn pitiful.

Funny faces are for cowards. Man up and engage.

You want to force a woman's shelter to put a mentally ill man in with women, many fleeing/hiding from abusive situations, where they may have been raped.


That is you libs putting political correctness ahead of the safety of women. At risk, vulnerable women.


And you put on airs about it. And fucked up the quotes so it made it look like I was the one spouting your shit.

This is the same bullshit you put forward last year about trannies raping 6 year olds in the public toilets.

I only heard one example of that, and I don't recall that it was a tranny, just a standard faggot.


And yes, it is that same type of, as you call it, "bullshit" if by "bullshit" you mean that I want to protect innocent people from violent criminals or crazies.


While you are more concerned with Political Correctness, than the safety of women and children.

You are not only ignorant of biological science, your ignorance drives your hate.

 

[danielpalos]

Government stimulus has always been the catalyst for any Capitalist venture from its conception. The maintenance of our military, roads, and bridges, comes directly from Socialism. Without it, there is no military, roads, and bridges.

Only a socialist would pretend that all government is socialism.

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

 

[Correll]

Funny faces are for cowards. Man up and engage.

You want to force a woman's shelter to put a mentally ill man in with women, many fleeing/hiding from abusive situations, where they may have been raped.


That is you libs putting political correctness ahead of the safety of women. At risk, vulnerable women.


And you put on airs about it. And fucked up the quotes so it made it look like I was the one spouting your shit.

This is the same bullshit you put forward last year about trannies raping 6 year olds in the public toilets.

I only heard one example of that, and I don't recall that it was a tranny, just a standard faggot.


And yes, it is that same type of, as you call it, "bullshit" if by "bullshit" you mean that I want to protect innocent people from violent criminals or crazies.


While you are more concerned with Political Correctness, than the safety of women and children.

You are not only ignorant of biological science, your ignorance drives your hate.

Said the man that wants to force women's shelters to allow mentally ill men.

 

[Correll]

Only a socialist would pretend that all government is socialism.

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

 

[BWK]

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Without the road, economic activity is not possible, therefore, government is the driving force for that economic activity. That is the whole point. And that is why and how Socialism has always taken ownership of these key components that makes commerce possible. Not a very hard concept to understand.

Building a road, does not justify the government taking ownership of some business that might use the road.


That you actually try to claim it does, supports my point that you are a socialist.

Lol! It comes with the territory. Why do you people make this harder than it is? Government roads= commerce. No government roads = no commerce. Have you got a better formula? I don't think so.

 

[BWK]

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument. You just boxed yourself in with "no they are not".

 

[Correll]

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Without the road, economic activity is not possible, therefore, government is the driving force for that economic activity. That is the whole point. And that is why and how Socialism has always taken ownership of these key components that makes commerce possible. Not a very hard concept to understand.

Building a road, does not justify the government taking ownership of some business that might use the road.


That you actually try to claim it does, supports my point that you are a socialist.

Lol! It comes with the territory. Why do you people make this harder than it is? Government roads= commerce. No government roads = no commerce. Have you got a better formula? I don't think so.

The problem is that helping someone or something, does not give you the right to demand control of that person or thing.


I've helped plenty of people in my life. Exactly ZERO, times have I expected that my help would give me the moral right to control them afterwards.


ONly a tyrant thinks like that.

 

[Correll]

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument.

No one here needs a link to know that there are other forms of "fiscal policy" other than "command economics."



Everyone dumb enough to not know that, has inserted a fork into a electrical plug, or used rat poison thinking it was salt, or some such mishap, and is now dead.

 

[BWK]

Funny faces are for cowards. Man up and engage.

You want to force a woman's shelter to put a mentally ill man in with women, many fleeing/hiding from abusive situations, where they may have been raped.


That is you libs putting political correctness ahead of the safety of women. At risk, vulnerable women.


And you put on airs about it. And fucked up the quotes so it made it look like I was the one spouting your shit.

This is the same bullshit you put forward last year about trannies raping 6 year olds in the public toilets.

I only heard one example of that, and I don't recall that it was a tranny, just a standard faggot.


And yes, it is that same type of, as you call it, "bullshit" if by "bullshit" you mean that I want to protect innocent people from violent criminals or crazies.


While you are more concerned with Political Correctness, than the safety of women and children.

You are not only ignorant of biological science, your ignorance drives your hate.

Said the man that wants to force women's shelters to allow mentally ill men.

"Said the man" who said something I never said. Quote me please on what post.

 

[BWK]

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument.

No one here needs a link to know that there are other forms of "fiscal policy" other than "command economics."

We don't need one. You do, which is why I asked you to produce one Spoiler alert, "you can't" Like I said, you boxed yourself in.

Everyone dumb enough to not know that, has inserted a fork into a electrical plug, or used rat poison thinking it was salt, or some such mishap, and is now dead.

Your random distraction won't save you. You cannot produce a link that reinforces your point. You best be heading to the back of the bus before you start looking foolish.

 

[Correll]

You want to force a woman's shelter to put a mentally ill man in with women, many fleeing/hiding from abusive situations, where they may have been raped.


That is you libs putting political correctness ahead of the safety of women. At risk, vulnerable women.


And you put on airs about it. And fucked up the quotes so it made it look like I was the one spouting your shit.

This is the same bullshit you put forward last year about trannies raping 6 year olds in the public toilets.

I only heard one example of that, and I don't recall that it was a tranny, just a standard faggot.


And yes, it is that same type of, as you call it, "bullshit" if by "bullshit" you mean that I want to protect innocent people from violent criminals or crazies.


While you are more concerned with Political Correctness, than the safety of women and children.

You are not only ignorant of biological science, your ignorance drives your hate.

Said the man that wants to force women's shelters to allow mentally ill men.

"Said the man" who said something I never said. Quote me please on what post.

Are you saying that you support the shelter turning away the mentally ill man?

 

[Correll]

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument.

No one here needs a link to know that there are other forms of "fiscal policy" other than "command economics."

We don't need one. You do, which is why I asked you to produce one Spoiler alert, "you can't" Like I said, you boxed yourself in.

Everyone dumb enough to not know that, has inserted a fork into a electrical plug, or used rat poison thinking it was salt, or some such mishap, and is now dead.

Your random distraction won't save you. You cannot produce a link that reinforces your point. You best be heading to the back of the bus before you start looking foolish.

YOu need a link to know that there are other forms of fiscial policy than "command economics"?

 

[TNHarley]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

/—-/ Give him bus fare to the men’s shelter.

Why did the cops keep taking someone who isn't a woman to a shelter that only takes women? Does Anchorage not have other homeless shelters where this wouldn't have been a problem?

Do you have biological evidence where this should be a problem?

Dont hold your breath. He is thick as shit.

He also doesn't have an answer. These homophobic ass holes haven't got any answers, as a matter of fact.Which is why they won't touch me, or this subject with a ten foot pole. They're so afraid that I'm right, that they had to check for themselves, what is and what isn't there. Lol!

You just compared homosexuality to transgenderism you stupid fucking hick.
You arent right about shit. You dont even know what you're talking about.

 

[danielpalos]

I never said that. You must have?

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

lol. Yes, they are.

 

[BWK]

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument.

No one here needs a link to know that there are other forms of "fiscal policy" other than "command economics."

We don't need one. You do, which is why I asked you to produce one Spoiler alert, "you can't" Like I said, you boxed yourself in.

Everyone dumb enough to not know that, has inserted a fork into a electrical plug, or used rat poison thinking it was salt, or some such mishap, and is now dead.

Your random distraction won't save you. You cannot produce a link that reinforces your point. You best be heading to the back of the bus before you start looking foolish.

YOu need a link to know that there are other forms of fiscial policy than "command economics"?

I do? Why me? You were the one who said "no they are not". It wasn't me. You were the one who said "there were other forms of "fiscal policy" not me. Lol! Why should I produce a link from which I never made a claim to? You really are making a fool of yourself now.

 

[BWK]

/—-/ Give him bus fare to the men’s shelter.

Why did the cops keep taking someone who isn't a woman to a shelter that only takes women? Does Anchorage not have other homeless shelters where this wouldn't have been a problem?

Do you have biological evidence where this should be a problem?

Dont hold your breath. He is thick as shit.

He also doesn't have an answer. These homophobic ass holes haven't got any answers, as a matter of fact.Which is why they won't touch me, or this subject with a ten foot pole. They're so afraid that I'm right, that they had to check for themselves, what is and what isn't there. Lol!

You just compared homosexuality to transgenderism you stupid fucking hick.
You arent right about shit. You dont even know what you're talking about.

Do you want to debate the subject or play cowardly semantics? I didn't think so. It's way over your Sheep sheered head.

 

[Correll]

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Fiscal and monetary policy are command economics and socialism.

No, they are not.

lol. Yes, they are.

laissez faire is a form of fiscal policy. It is the opposite of command economics.


Right there that refutes what you said.

 

[Correll]

No, they are not.

Links to prove him wrong?" No they are not" is not a substitute for a counter argument.

No one here needs a link to know that there are other forms of "fiscal policy" other than "command economics."

We don't need one. You do, which is why I asked you to produce one Spoiler alert, "you can't" Like I said, you boxed yourself in.

Everyone dumb enough to not know that, has inserted a fork into a electrical plug, or used rat poison thinking it was salt, or some such mishap, and is now dead.

Your random distraction won't save you. You cannot produce a link that reinforces your point. You best be heading to the back of the bus before you start looking foolish.

YOu need a link to know that there are other forms of fiscial policy than "command economics"?

I do? Why me? You were the one who said "no they are not". It wasn't me. You were the one who said "there were other forms of "fiscal policy" not me. Lol! Why should I produce a link from which I never made a claim to? You really are making a fool of yourself now.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics?


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

 

[Oddball]

If you think military, roads, and bridges are "Socialism" you are now making a distinction without a difference.

Take it at face value....The roads are generally sucky, too many bridges rated sub-par to mention, and the military is a gigantic money pit that couldn't pass an audit if they even submitted to one....If those are examples of the "success" of socialism, I want to see what failure looks like