A lot of us see no way for the Jury to convict Trump

[progressive hunter]

 

[Robert W]

Any General would resist a presidential coup.

There was no coup. You would find Generals involved were there a Coup. Waging a coup is my meaning.

 

[Robert W]

Irrelevant and unimportant.

That is ridiculous to say that. It is very important.

 

[Robert W]

I understand justice just fine. Trump is being tried for illegal shit he's done.

That's justice.

Not that he has done, that the prosecutor imagines he did. The Jury will free Trump.

 

[JoeB131]

Not that he has done, that the prosecutor imagines he did. The Jury will free Trump.

Dream on, buddy.

Even Trump is unhappy with his representation.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There was no coup. You would find Generals involved were there a Coup. Waging a coup is my meaning.

Yes, if Trump engaged in a coup, the military would take him out. Milley made it clear to Trump that whatever it was that he was up to the military would not be involved.

 

[Robert W]

Yes, if Trump engaged in a coup, the military would take him out. Milley made it clear to Trump that whatever it was that he was up to the military would not be involved.

I don't want your bullshit. Show us that Milley did as you claim. Trump never asked Milley to engage in a coup.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I don't want your bullshit. Show us that Milley did as you claim. Trump never asked Milley to engage in a coup.

You have no idea. And the military never would support such a thing, as you well know.

 

[Robert W]

You have no idea. And the military never would support such a thing, as you well know.

Because Trump did not attempt a coup.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Robert, you have unwillful understanding of normal terms and definitions.

That means nothing under law.

 

[Robert W]

Robert, you have unwillful understanding of normal terms and definitions.

That means nothing under law.

You are not able to communicate.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You are not able to communicate.

You willfully do not understand normal definitions and terms.

 

[Robert W]

You willfully do not understand normal definitions and terms.

That is your problem, not mine.

 

[d0gbreath]

It really should be an acquittal, but you know that there will be just a few hard-left radicals that don’t care about the law - only getting Trump.

My expectation is that it will be a hung jury, and my fear is that the Soros-funded DA will call for a new trial.

If the jury hangs, there will be a new trial. Count on it.

 

[d0gbreath]

Yup, you can’t negate my point. You are still unable to name a crime, other than an expired misdemeanor.

The felony charge is election interference. It's clearly stated in the documents that none of us read. Well, maybe one or two. But not you. That's why you don't know anything.

 

[Lisa558]

If the jury hangs, there will be a new trial. Count on it.

Just how much Stalin-style persecution of political opponents do you think decent Americans will tolerate? There would be massive backlash.

 

[JoeB131]

Just how much Stalin-style persecution of political opponents do you think decent Americans will tolerate? There would be massive backlash.

Again, most people realize what Trump did was wrong.

Even if you don't buy that he broke the law, paying off a porn star to keep quiet about a sexual encounter you had while your third wife is at home with your fifth child isn't exactly "Party of Family Values" material.

Your side impeached Clinton for a lot less, and spent 70 million dollars on the investigation.

 

[Lisa558]

The felony charge is election interference. It's clearly stated in the documents that none of us read. Well, maybe one or two. But not you. That's why you don't know anything.

Paying a non-disclosure agreement and labeling it Legal Expenses is not election interference.

Now, getting 51 retired intelligence officers to lie and say Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian disinformation”? THAT is election interference.

And this bogus case designed to keep Trump off the campaign trail is election interference.

 

[d0gbreath]

Just how much Stalin-style persecution of political opponents do you think decent Americans will tolerate? There would be massive backlash.

Are you threatening blood in the streets, or just bitching online?

 

[Lisa558]

Are you threatening blood in the streets, or just bitching online?

I’m responding to your statement.

And blood in the streers is a leftist thing.