nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,965
- 1,870
- Banned
- #1
It is seldom acknowledged that (as even Assange has alluded to) there were anti-Clinton moles within the DNC who (again, according to Assange) fed pilfered and perhaps even made up disinformation on the Clinton campaign.
Steele stated the following:
In the wider context campaign/Kremlin co-operation, Source E claimed that the intelligence network being used against CLINTON comprised three elements. Firstly there were agents/facilitators within the Democratic Party structure itself; secondly Russian emigre and associated offensive cyber operators based in the US... and thirdly, state-sponsored cyber operatives working in Russia.
The senate intelligence committee seems to be placing quite a bit of validity on Steele's dossier, having shown that several allegations by Steele have proven accurate.
It would be interesting if the investigations widened the scope to include who and how many moles actually were burrowed into the DNC.
Steele stated the following:
In the wider context campaign/Kremlin co-operation, Source E claimed that the intelligence network being used against CLINTON comprised three elements. Firstly there were agents/facilitators within the Democratic Party structure itself; secondly Russian emigre and associated offensive cyber operators based in the US... and thirdly, state-sponsored cyber operatives working in Russia.
The senate intelligence committee seems to be placing quite a bit of validity on Steele's dossier, having shown that several allegations by Steele have proven accurate.
It would be interesting if the investigations widened the scope to include who and how many moles actually were burrowed into the DNC.
Last edited: