A possible environmental disaster

[Stryder50]

If you had a choice between living the rest of your life next to Chernobyl or next to a mountain of used turbine blades, which would you pick?

God are you stupid.

You present a hobson's choice which is disconnected to reality.
There are several mountains of used wind turbine blades, FWIW.
A couple challenges with wind tech is that the blades (and other components) don't "live" their projected useful lifetime. i.e. proving not cost effective.
Other challenge/issue is they use a lot of "fossil fuel"(petroleum) in their production. Both for the basic material they are made of and also the energy to make them. An additional not cost effective factors.

 

[skookerasbil]

You present a hobson's choice which is disconnected to reality.
There are several mountains of used wind turbine blades, FWIW.
A couple challenges with wind tech is that the blades (and other components) don't "live" their projected useful lifetime. i.e. proving not cost effective.
Other challenge/issue is they use a lot of "fossil fuel"(petroleum) in their production. Both for the basic material they are made of and also the energy to make them. An additional not cost effective factors.

Progressives are not big picture people....no ability.

We have oil at $120/ barbell today and they are stuck on what the wind/solar landscape might look like in two to three decades. It a massive disconnect from real.

Indeed....the greens look like the biggest meatheads walking the planet this week as world events unfold. They are irrelevant now.

---