shintao
Take Down ~ Tap Out
- Aug 27, 2010
- 7,230
- 362
The National Average wage in America in 2009 was $40,711.61. How close were you to that "average" figure? (1)
The average Union Wage in 2009 was $47,216.00 (908. x 52 weeks). How close were you that figure? (2)
The Top 500 CEOs averaged a $11.4 million wage in 2009. How close were you to that figure? (3)
Knowing these figures for 2009, I must ask the right why they are attacking Union members who only make $6,505. a year ($3.13 hr. more) more than unskilled workers, and $10.992,784. less than CEOs?
Maybe they can explain this flaw in logic that even a common sense con might understand, in capitalist terms that we would all enjoy to hear. Cons claim capitalism is about making profits whenever they defend a CEO, but not when they attack a Union member. Why is that? And I would expect most of those posting here make over the average of a common worker and union member, but I am fairly sure none are making more than a CEO. Yet they attack the Union member when they make more average wages a year than they do.
So tell us all about it cons. How do you explain this illogical position you hold? Or support your imbeciles in congress who want to tear down the capitalist system, for the average American worker. The only object being is to pay American workers less, yet shield the CEOs who make more.
(1) National Average Wage Index
(2) The Union Advantage: Facts and Figures
(3) CEO Compensation - Forbes.com
The average Union Wage in 2009 was $47,216.00 (908. x 52 weeks). How close were you that figure? (2)
The Top 500 CEOs averaged a $11.4 million wage in 2009. How close were you to that figure? (3)
Knowing these figures for 2009, I must ask the right why they are attacking Union members who only make $6,505. a year ($3.13 hr. more) more than unskilled workers, and $10.992,784. less than CEOs?
Maybe they can explain this flaw in logic that even a common sense con might understand, in capitalist terms that we would all enjoy to hear. Cons claim capitalism is about making profits whenever they defend a CEO, but not when they attack a Union member. Why is that? And I would expect most of those posting here make over the average of a common worker and union member, but I am fairly sure none are making more than a CEO. Yet they attack the Union member when they make more average wages a year than they do.
So tell us all about it cons. How do you explain this illogical position you hold? Or support your imbeciles in congress who want to tear down the capitalist system, for the average American worker. The only object being is to pay American workers less, yet shield the CEOs who make more.
(1) National Average Wage Index
(2) The Union Advantage: Facts and Figures
(3) CEO Compensation - Forbes.com
Last edited: