A remedy to gerrymandering.

[Supposn]

Simple remedy to gerrymandering of congressional districts. Weigh the vote of U.S. House of Representatives members.

Each congressional district's representative's votes within congressional proceedings should have weight proportional to the percentage of votes that favored the winner of that district's last representative election.
This proposal doesn't require a constitutional amendment or passage of a congressional bill. At the initialization of each congress, (after the new members have been sworn in), each congressional chamber has always determined their own rules of procedures; those rules have sometimes changed since the first session of United States Congress,
Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No.

 

[miketx]

Simple remedy to gerrymandering of congressional districts. Weigh the vote of U.S. House of Representatives members.

Each congressional district's representative's votes within congressional proceedings should have weight proportional to the percentage of votes that favored the winner of that district's last representative election.
This proposal doesn't require a constitutional amendment or passage of a congressional bill. At the initialization of each congress, (after the new members have been sworn in), each congressional chamber has always determined their own rules of procedures; those rules have sometimes changed since the first session of United States Congress,
Respectfully, Supposn

Who does the weighin?

 

[Supposn]

Who does the weighin?

Simple remedy to gerrymandering of congressional districts. Weigh the vote of U.S. House of Representatives members.

Each congressional district's representative's votes within congressional proceedings should have weight proportional to the percentage of votes that favored the winner of that district's last representative election. ...

Miketx, as I explicitly posted, "Each congressional district's representative's votes within congressional proceedings should have weight proportional to the percentage of votes that favored the winner of that district's last representative election. ...".

I can only repeat what I explicitly posted. You consider my post as ambiguous? The voters determine the weight of their district Representative's votes within our U.S. Congressional proceedings. Respectfully, Supposn

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Someone who won with 60% of the vote get more “weight” than someone with 51%????

The democrat Party already has over 1 million fake votes in NY, so how does this proposal end gerrymandering as we know it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Someone who won with 60% of the vote get more “weight” than someone with 51%????

The democrat Party already has over 1 million fake votes in NY, so how does this proposal end gerrymandering as we know it?

Exactly! It would reward gerrymandering and additional vote fraud.

 

[Supposn]

Someone who won with 60% of the vote get more “weight” than someone with 51%????

The democrat Party already has over 1 million fake votes in NY, so how does this proposal end gerrymandering as we know it?

CrusadeFrank, Donald Trump came close, but he wasn't the choice of USA's majority of voters in2018 or 2022 elections in both 2018 and 2022, but in 2018 the majority of those chosen to be members of the Electoral College were Trump supporters. In 2019, in accordance with USA's laws, Trump was elected to be our president of the United Sates of America.

In 2022, many of those who voted for Trump, regretted their 2018 choice. In 2022, Joseph Biden was favored by a greater majority of USA's voters and more importantly, a majority of those elected to serve in the Electoral College were Biden supporters.
In 2023, the majority of electors, in accordance with USA's laws, elected Biden to be our president.

Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit.
Respectfully, Supposn

 

[miketx]

CrusadeFrank, Donald Trump came close, but he wasn't the choice of USA's majority of voters in2018 or 2022 elections in both 2018 and 2022, but in 2018 the majority of those chosen to be members of the Electoral College were Trump supporters. In 2019, in accordance with USA's laws, Trump was elected to be our president of the United Sates of America.

In 2022, many of those who voted for Trump, regretted their 2018 choice. In 2022, Joseph Biden was favored by a greater majority of USA's voters and more importantly, a majority of those elected to serve in the Electoral College were Biden supporters.
In 2023, the majority of electors, in accordance with USA's laws, elected Biden to be our president.

Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit.
Respectfully, Supposn

You're full of crap.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

in 2018 the majority of those chosen to be members of the Electoral College were Trump supporters.

Which electors were chosen in 2018?

What country are you posting from?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

CrusadeFrank, Donald Trump came close, but he wasn't the choice of USA's majority of voters in2018 or 2022 elections in both 2018 and 2022, but in 2018 the majority of those chosen to be members of the Electoral College were Trump supporters. In 2019, in accordance with USA's laws, Trump was elected to be our president of the United Sates of America.

In 2022, many of those who voted for Trump, regretted their 2018 choice. In 2022, Joseph Biden was favored by a greater majority of USA's voters and more importantly, a majority of those elected to serve in the Electoral College were Biden supporters.
In 2023, the majority of electors, in accordance with USA's laws, elected Biden to be our president.

Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit.
Respectfully, Supposn

The democrats cheated in the tens of millions column. We've reached the point where we can no longer vote our way out of the democrat 1,000 Year Reich

 

[Supposn]

The democrats cheated in the tens of millions column. We've reached the point where we can no longer vote our way out of the democrat 1,000 Year Reich

CrusaderFrank, you've stated an opinion.
Are you able to cite any links to credible information and/or authoritative sources that contending the statement "Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have, [thus far] found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit", is less than factual? Respectfully, Supposn

 

[miketx]

CrusaderFrank, you've stated an opinion.
Are you able to cite any links to credible information and/or authoritative sources that contending the statement "Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have, [thus far] found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit", is less than factual? Respectfully, Supposn

Lol, leftist bullshit.

 

[Supposn]

Lol, leftist bullshit.

Miketx, other than I'm apparently left of your positions, your post provides no additional facts or logical concepts to this thread. You embarrass yourself.
Respectfully, Supposn

 

[miketx]

Miketx, other than I'm apparently left of your positions, your post provides no additional facts or logical concepts to this thread. You embarrass yourself.
Respectfully, Supposn

Leftist babble.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Miketx, other than I'm apparently left of your positions, your post provides no additional facts or logical concepts to this thread. You embarrass yourself.
Respectfully, Supposn

There are no logical concepts in your OP.

 

[Supposn]

There are no logical concepts in your OP.

CrusaderFrank & Toddstrepatriot, all of the statement, "Many, possibly the majority of the USA state's election boards were headed by the same people in both the 2018 and 2022 elections. Many, possibly the majority of the USA congressional district's election workers served in both 2018 and 2019. U.S. federal courts have, [thus far] found all challenges to Biden's election to be without merit",

Toddsterpstriot & Miketx, I'm unaware of USA states experiencing substantial turnover of their election boards or other election administrative organizations between 2018 - 20222.
all of the statement is factual and/or logical. Can you guys provide any links from credible and/or authoritative sources which would give people good reason to conclude otherwise? Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpstriot & Miketx, I'm unaware of USA states experiencing substantial turnover of their election boards or other election administrative organizations between 2018 - 20222.
all of the statement is factual and/or logical. Can you guys provide any links from credible and/or authoritative sources which would give people good reason to conclude otherwise? Respectfully, Supposn

A remedy to gerrymandering.​

How is increasing the reward for gerrymandering a remedy for gerrymandering?

 

[miketx]

Toddsterpstriot & Miketx, I'm unaware of USA states experiencing substantial turnover of their election boards or other election administrative organizations between 2018 - 20222.
all of the statement is factual and/or logical. Can you guys provide any links from credible and/or authoritative sources which would give people good reason to conclude otherwise? Respectfully, Supposn

Supply your own gd links.

 

[Supposn]

Simple remedy to gerrymandering of congressional districts. Weigh the vote of U.S. House of Representatives members.

Each congressional district's representative's votes within congressional proceedings should have weight proportional to the percentage of votes that favored the winner of that district's last representative election. ...

A remedy to gerrymandering.​

How is increasing the reward for gerrymandering a remedy for gerrymandering?

Toddsterpatiot, it's difficult to determine if you're pretending or really do lack normal intelligence.


Within this proposal, although the U.S constitution and federal laws regarding each state's numbers of congressional representatives remain fully intact, and regardless of how congressional districts are drawn on the maps of each state, there's little or no political advantage to gerrymandering. (i.e. this proposal doesn't directly or indirectly “reward gerrymandering”. Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpatiot, it's difficult to determine if you're pretending or really do lack normal intelligence.


Within this proposal, although the U.S constitution and federal laws regarding each state's numbers of congressional representatives remain fully intact, and regardless of how congressional districts are drawn on the maps of each state, there's little or no political advantage to gerrymandering. (i.e. this proposal doesn't directly or indirectly “reward gerrymandering”. Respectfully, Supposn

there's little or no political advantage to gerrymandering

Your silly proposal will give parties more incentive to gerrymander their districts.
A Dem district with 90% of the vote gives that politician a much larger vote in Congress than a Dem district with 51% of the vote.

(i.e. this proposal doesn't directly or indirectly “reward gerrymandering”.

Based on previous interactions with you, I'm confident that you really do lack normal intelligence.