Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't. I repeat, pictures aren't arguments.Sure they are. That one demolishes your pretense that your argument was over fine legal points.
You can't present any evidence and you any make any arguments that aren't in pictograph form, gee, no wonder so many doubt your sincerity.I've noted your arguments as you have made them in the past, when they were Moral Arguments and see no reason to waste time finding them so that you can dismiss them with shit talk.
The question of whether or not morality is a basis for objective arguments and whether or not society is more in line with my morality or yours are two separate issues. It's okay if you don't quite understand how. I don't expect you to.The fact remains. BLM is a moral argument. That you have revealed you don't have a moral problem with the killing of "unarmed" people, shows that your support of that movement, is NOT based on it's stated justification.
Of course not, unarmed doesn't mean not a threat. Each case must be determined on its own merits.And here we see again, that you have no problem with the use of deadly force by the police against unarmed individuals, in principle.
Subjective morality doesn't mean no morality you moron. Let's just agree you're too stupid to understand the nuance here.Thus, the moral outrage of BLM, is not your reason for supporting it.
My subjective beliefs are why I support BLM. Rationality is what you should use to craft strategy that accomplishes your subjective goals. My reasons for supporting the protests over the summer was to pressure law enforcement to investigate the murders of George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery, which they ended up doing to satisfying conclusions.THus, teh question becomes, what IS your reason for supporting it.
There were OathKeepers and other milita types who PLANNED to attack the Capitol from the beginning.They were demonstrators. If it was a planned insurrection it was a poor one with unarmed mam and pop participants. An unarmed demonstrator was shot and killed and the point is that the FBI had sympathy? What the hell does that mean?
So where is the evidence they organized the rioting? See a person can hold the flag and not be directed by any leader in the organization to cause violence.
I don’t believe there was any attempt to violently overthrow the election.You think attempting to violently overthrow an election is “nonsense”?
Yeah well, there wasI don’t believe there was any attempt to violently overthrow the election.
Actually you're rightUh no because they didn’t organize any rioting whatsoever.
There were OathKeepers and other milita types who PLANNED to attack the Capitol from the beginning.
Hence the Seditious Conspiracy charges and convictions.
Those assholes lead other gullible MAGA rats in the attack
Nothing like that happened during the George Floyd protests
It is a total false equivalency
You can make bullshit up if you want to but real adults are just going to ignore you lolActually you're right
The DNC organized it.
And paid for it.
You'll let me know when you become one.You can make bullshit up if you want to but real adults are just going to ignore you lol
You guessed it. They tried to use the summer riots as a whataboutism to justify it. Of course because they have
entirely different causes, it doesn’t even make sense to use it as a whataboutism.
This FBI email sums it up well:
“I literally had to explain to an agent from a ‘blue state’ office the difference between opportunists burning and looting during protests that stemmed legitimate grievance to police brutality vs. an insurgent mob whose purpose was to prevent the execution of democratic processes at the behest of a sitting president,” the email states. “One is a smattering of criminals, the other is an organized group of domestic terrorists.”
As FBI probed Jan. 6, many agents sympathized with insurrection, according to newly released email
"I literally had to explain to an agent" the difference between Black Lives Matter police protests and the insurrection, email warns.www.yahoo.com
Protests.You are a lying sack of shit as usual.
The DNC organized and paid for those protests.
They PAID, to rain terror down on every major population center in the United States.
RIOTS, you lying asshole.Protests.
Not riots
What they FUNDED...were PROTESTS...you assholeRIOTS, you lying asshole.
40 murders.
2000 injured cops
4 billion in property damage
Fucking RIOTS, you lying little scumbag
Lol dude most of the people dead were the black people involved. You asshats try to make this about liberals but I guarantee you the large majority of them did not give a shit about politics to begin with.RIOTS, you lying asshole.
40 murders.
2000 injured cops
4 billion in property damage
Fucking RIOTS, you lying little scumbag
So they were using violence to stop the certification…and looking to hang Pence for kicks?I don’t believe there was any attempt to violently overthrow the election.
Some of them used violence. But they had no guns inside the Capitol; so your thesis is that the revolution was going to be non-violent in the sense of shooting.So they were using violence to stop the certification…and looking to hang Pence for kicks?
What they FUNDED...were PROTESTS...you asshole
I know all about itYa know like SIGNS and shit
