A trump Campaign Ad Depicts A Police Being Attacked By Protesters Is A 2014 Photo From Ukraine

[bigrebnc1775]

trump used a shot taken 6 years ago in Ukraine and uses it in his campaign ad.

Wow. I bet his followers will believe it's of Americans. Which is what trump wants.

More lies and manipulations from trump. In other words, a typical day with trump as president.

A new Trump campaign ad depicting a police officer being attacked by protesters is actually a 2014 photo of pro-democracy protests in Ukraine

The Trump campaign ad says "public safety vs chaos & violence" and includes an image that's not from the US protests at all.

www.businessinsider.com

The tRump campaign lied?!?!?!?!?

Oh, wait.

It's the tRump campaign.

Of course they did.

That's all they've got.

Please disclose the lie you speak of

Go back and read the OP. It's there.

I did, I'll ask again, what is the lie

Better yet, how does the photo mislead the narrative of the ad

Or, do you simply have a problem with the picture not depicting
the current clashes between protesters and police here in America

Once more for the hard of thinking:

The.

Photo.

Is.

A.

Lie.

but the attacks on police is not

 

[Care4all]

This federal paramilitary sent by Trump, has got to stop, NOW!

F ing Nazi.

ACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366280


View attachment 366281

View attachment 366283

UNACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366284


View attachment 366285

View attachment 366286

View attachment 366287

Terrorizing people, vandalism, destruction of property and looting is criminal behavior
NOT A FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND PROTECTED AS SUCH

Trump HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INTERVENE TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER
WHERE STATE OFFICIALS HAVE FAILED THEIR OBLIGATION TO DO SO

I can only hope things continue to blow up in the faces of you and your ilk

I agree that protesters are not the criminal rioters....

I do not agree that this is a federal govt duty to police the states.... The Constitution specifically says, It Is Not.

You're suggestion?

Follow the Constitution .... let the State, or people within the State who elect their own public leaders in their state, handle it, as they have done in all 50 states for the near past 250 years.... it is NOT a federal job duty of some president and his paramilitary, and never has been....

 

[keepitreal]

This federal paramilitary sent by Trump, has got to stop, NOW!

F ing Nazi.

ACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366280


View attachment 366281

View attachment 366283

UNACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366284


View attachment 366285

View attachment 366286

View attachment 366287

Terrorizing people, vandalism, destruction of property and looting is criminal behavior
NOT A FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND PROTECTED AS SUCH

Trump HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INTERVENE TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER
WHERE STATE OFFICIALS HAVE FAILED THEIR OBLIGATION TO DO SO

I can only hope things continue to blow up in the faces of you and your ilk

I agree that protesters are not the criminal rioters....

I do not agree that this is a federal govt duty to police the states.... The Constitution specifically says, It Is Not.

You're suggestion?

Follow the Constitution .... let the State, or people within the State who elect their own public leaders in their state, handle it, as they have done in all 50 states for the near past 250 years.... it is NOT a federal job duty of some president and his paramilitary, and never has been....

It must not be the ex- ercise of a political discretion with which the legis- lature is invested, for that can never become the sub- ject of judicial cognizance.

The constitution declares, that Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia in three
specified cases: for organizing, arming, and disciplining them; and for governing such part of them
as may be employed in the service of the Uni- ted States ; reserving to the States, respectively, the
appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline pre- scribed
by Congress. It is further provided, that the President of the United States shall be commander of the militia, when called into the actual service of the United States.

The act of the 2d of May, 1792, which is re-en- acted almost verbatim by that of the 28th of Fe-
bruary, 1795, authorizes the President of the United States, in case of invasion, or of imminent danger of it, or when it may be necessary for executing the laws of the United States, or to suppress insurrec- tions, to call forth such number of the militia of the States most convenient to the scene of action, as he may judge necessary, and to issue his orders for that purpose, to such officer of the militia as he shall think proper.


Article I, Section 8, Clause 15:

[The Congress shall have Power . . .] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; . . .

The states as well as Congress may prescribe penalties for failure to obey the President's call of the militia. They also have a concurrent power to aid the National Government by calls under their own authority, and in emergencies may use the militia to put down armed insurrection. 1 The Federal Government may call out the militia in case of civil war; its authority to suppress rebellion is found in the power to suppress insurrection and to carry on war. 2 The act of February 28, 1795, 3which delegated to the President the power to call out the militia, was held constitutional. 4 A militiaman who refused to obey such a call was not employed in the service of the United States so as to be subject to the article of war, but was liable to be tried for disobedience of the act of 1795. 5

Power to Call Forth the Militia | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

An annotation about Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

 

[Care4all]

This federal paramilitary sent by Trump, has got to stop, NOW!

F ing Nazi.

ACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366280


View attachment 366281

View attachment 366283

UNACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366284


View attachment 366285

View attachment 366286

View attachment 366287

Terrorizing people, vandalism, destruction of property and looting is criminal behavior
NOT A FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND PROTECTED AS SUCH

Trump HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INTERVENE TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER
WHERE STATE OFFICIALS HAVE FAILED THEIR OBLIGATION TO DO SO

I can only hope things continue to blow up in the faces of you and your ilk

I agree that protesters are not the criminal rioters....

I do not agree that this is a federal govt duty to police the states.... The Constitution specifically says, It Is Not.

You're suggestion?

Follow the Constitution .... let the State, or people within the State who elect their own public leaders in their state, handle it, as they have done in all 50 states for the near past 250 years.... it is NOT a federal job duty of some president and his paramilitary, and never has been....

It must not be the ex- ercise of a political discretion with which the legis- lature is invested, for that can never become the sub- ject of judicial cognizance.

The constitution declares, that Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia in three
specified cases: for organizing, arming, and disciplining them; and for governing such part of them
as may be employed in the service of the Uni- ted States ; reserving to the States, respectively, the
appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline pre- scribed
by Congress. It is further provided, that the President of the United States shall be commander of the militia, when called into the actual service of the United States.

The act of the 2d of May, 1792, which is re-en- acted almost verbatim by that of the 28th of Fe-
bruary, 1795, authorizes the President of the United States, in case of invasion, or of imminent danger of it, or when it may be necessary for executing the laws of the United States, or to suppress insurrec- tions, to call forth such number of the militia of the States most convenient to the scene of action, as he may judge necessary, and to issue his orders for that purpose, to such officer of the militia as he shall think proper.


Article I, Section 8, Clause 15:

[The Congress shall have Power . . .] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; . . .

The states as well as Congress may prescribe penalties for failure to obey the President's call of the militia. They also have a concurrent power to aid the National Government by calls under their own authority, and in emergencies may use the militia to put down armed insurrection. 1 The Federal Government may call out the militia in case of civil war; its authority to suppress rebellion is found in the power to suppress insurrection and to carry on war. 2 The act of February 28, 1795, 3which delegated to the President the power to call out the militia, was held constitutional. 4 A militiaman who refused to obey such a call was not employed in the service of the United States so as to be subject to the article of war, but was liable to be tried for disobedience of the act of 1795. 5

Power to Call Forth the Militia | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

An annotation about Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

Ahemmm

A protest and riot, is NONE of those things and is delegated to the States to police....

We live in a republic.

 

[keepitreal]

This federal paramilitary sent by Trump, has got to stop, NOW!

F ing Nazi.

ACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366280


View attachment 366281

View attachment 366283

UNACCEPTABLE

View attachment 366284


View attachment 366285

View attachment 366286

View attachment 366287

Terrorizing people, vandalism, destruction of property and looting is criminal behavior
NOT A FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND PROTECTED AS SUCH

Trump HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INTERVENE TO RESTORE LAW AND ORDER
WHERE STATE OFFICIALS HAVE FAILED THEIR OBLIGATION TO DO SO

I can only hope things continue to blow up in the faces of you and your ilk

I agree that protesters are not the criminal rioters....

I do not agree that this is a federal govt duty to police the states.... The Constitution specifically says, It Is Not.

You're suggestion?

Follow the Constitution .... let the State, or people within the State who elect their own public leaders in their state, handle it, as they have done in all 50 states for the near past 250 years.... it is NOT a federal job duty of some president and his paramilitary, and never has been....

It must not be the ex- ercise of a political discretion with which the legis- lature is invested, for that can never become the sub- ject of judicial cognizance.

The constitution declares, that Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia in three
specified cases: for organizing, arming, and disciplining them; and for governing such part of them
as may be employed in the service of the Uni- ted States ; reserving to the States, respectively, the
appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline pre- scribed
by Congress. It is further provided, that the President of the United States shall be commander of the militia, when called into the actual service of the United States.

The act of the 2d of May, 1792, which is re-en- acted almost verbatim by that of the 28th of Fe-
bruary, 1795, authorizes the President of the United States, in case of invasion, or of imminent danger of it, or when it may be necessary for executing the laws of the United States, or to suppress insurrec- tions, to call forth such number of the militia of the States most convenient to the scene of action, as he may judge necessary, and to issue his orders for that purpose, to such officer of the militia as he shall think proper.


Article I, Section 8, Clause 15:

[The Congress shall have Power . . .] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; . . .

The states as well as Congress may prescribe penalties for failure to obey the President's call of the militia. They also have a concurrent power to aid the National Government by calls under their own authority, and in emergencies may use the militia to put down armed insurrection. 1 The Federal Government may call out the militia in case of civil war; its authority to suppress rebellion is found in the power to suppress insurrection and to carry on war. 2 The act of February 28, 1795, 3which delegated to the President the power to call out the militia, was held constitutional. 4 A militiaman who refused to obey such a call was not employed in the service of the United States so as to be subject to the article of war, but was liable to be tried for disobedience of the act of 1795. 5

Power to Call Forth the Militia | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

An annotation about Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

Ahemmm

A protest and riot, is NONE of those things and is delegated to the States to police....

We live in a republic.

Insurrection

a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Insurrection Act of 1807

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007) that empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection and rebellion.

The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard:

• when requested by a state's legislature, or governor if the legislature cannot be convened, to address an insurrection against that state (§ 251),
• to address an insurrection, in any state, which makes it impracticable to enforce the law (§ 252), or
• to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of Constitutionally-secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights (§ 253).

Insurrection Act of 1807 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Sorry, again,
Terrorizing people, vandalism, destruction of property and looting is criminal behavior
NOT A FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND PROTECTED AS SUCH

Ordering law enforcement to stand down IS CRIMINAL
Restoring the RULE OF LAW isn't a choice, it's an OBLIGATION

Law abiding protests are a Constitutional right and protected as such
People have THE RIGHT to collectively gather in support of or in opposition to
People DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to collectively gather and engage in criminal behavior
until their demands are met or are satisfied by negotiated compromises

When you are afforded a protected liberty, you are also bound by protected liberties

Gucci bags and Nike shoes had shit to do with George Floyd or racism or bad cops
Statues that have been around longer then most of these POS have been alive...WHY NOW
The latest demands to correct systemic racism and racist police
abolish rent and free houses....GO FUCK YOURSELF

178 people have been shot and killed in Chicago in the 2 months since GF..
Nearly 80% were BLACK... KILLED BY ANOTHER BLACK

396 people have been shot and killed in Chicago this year as of July 24th
304 WERE BLACK as of July 14
2 people were shot and killed in January and 1 person in February by police...
It is now July, it's been 5 months since someone was killed by a cop in Chicago
and when GF died, it had been 3 months since police were involved in someone's death
4 police have been shot this year

Maybe your kids ran the show in your house
and you let them do whatever the fuck they wanted...
but this isn't your house and Trump is shutting down the show