A vote for Hillary is a vote to send your kids and grandkids to war "to help Israel"

[LaDexter]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

 

[kaz]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

The only thing Clinton wants from Jews in their vote. She's head of the Jew hating Democrat party. Don't get your undies in a bundle, they are with you

 

[LaDexter]

First of all, the term is Zionist. Hillary has the support of all Zionist Jews. The sensible Jews like Jill Stein see right through her.

Hillary is Netanyahu's "horse" in this race.

Wikileaks: Netanyahu Prefers Hillary -- to Obama, not Trump

 

[kaz]

First of all, the term is Zionist. Hillary has the support of all Zionist Jews. The sensible Jews like Jill Stein see right through her.

Hillary is Netanyahu's "horse" in this race.

Wikileaks: Netanyahu Prefers Hillary -- to Obama, not Trump

Jew dog bastards, where do they think they get of deserving to have a homeland? They're lucky if we let them live, ay, Adolph?

I do appreciate though your view that we can let the ones who don't get all uppity live, very generous of you

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

Demagoguery – the last gasp of the desperate, ridiculous right.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

First of all, the term is Zionist. Hillary has the support of all Zionist Jews. The sensible Jews like Jill Stein see right through her.

Hillary is Netanyahu's "horse" in this race.

Wikileaks: Netanyahu Prefers Hillary -- to Obama, not Trump

First of all, your thread premise is a lie.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Unfortunately, permanent war is the "new" paradigm regardless of who you vote for, it is utterly bipartisan. It's just good for business and we are after all the arms dealer to the world.

 

[cnelsen]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

The only thing Clinton wants from Jews in their vote. She's head of the Jew hating Democrat party. Don't get your undies in a bundle, they are with you

I agree with your first two lines, but Jew-hating Democrat party?

Both parties always swear total fealty to Israel, if that counts as loving Jews. And they want Jewish money, certainly (and for saying he didn't need it, the Jerusalem Post listed as one of three reasons "no Jew in good conscience could vote for Donald Trump").

Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama

Here is the WikiLeaks-provided discussion within the Clinton campaign of the Politico story linked above (re-ordered chronologically):

On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Oren Shur <[email protected]> wrote: This article seems to make the case for the Mook approach - clear, direct and principled.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: I was just thinking: has she made a clear statement on Israel yet? I get this question from donors all the time. Does she need to state her principles on Israel before Iran? Or do both at the same time?

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]> wrote: That's basically the goal of the BDS letter.

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: Do we need to push it harder over the next few days? Get something written? I feel like we're going to want something to point to. Or maybe even just content on the website?

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Christina Reynolds < [email protected]> wrote: We could either get a donor to leak it or just give it to a reporter if we want to get it out there. I'm semi-surprised it's not out yet.

*From:* Jake Sullivan [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Friday, July 3, 2015 2:44 PM *To:* Christina Reynolds *Cc:* Robby Mook; Dan Schwerin; Oren Shur; John Podesta; Nick Merrill *Subject:* Re: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO We have a two pager I'm getting clearance from her on. That is what we have to ship around.

On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Christina Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: Right, but if we wanted to have a reporter cover the Israel support now, a leak of the letter could probably get written. Otherwise, we can work around the Israel support for reporters covering Iran.

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-07-03 17:07 Subject: Re: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO

Let's def give it to someone. I see zero downside to a story. Then we can circulate around right away (hopefully) in advance of Iran

 

[LaDexter]

If you tell the truth about Zionism and Hillary here, you get a bunch of cards tossed at you.

In fact, we were warned about Zionism being fascist by Albert Einstein


Einstein Letter Warning Of Zionist Facism In Israel

Einstein Letter Warning Of
Zionist Facism In Israel
Letter That Albert Einstein Sent to the New York Times
1948, Protesting the Visit of Menachem Begin
11-1-4

Letters to the Editor
New York Times
December 4, 1948
TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughoutthe world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants ? 240men, women, and children - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.
The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.
Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.
The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ
HANNAH ARENDT
ABRAHAM BRICK
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO
ALBERT EINSTEIN
HERMAN EISEN, M.D.
HAYIM FINEMAN
M. GALLEN, M.D.
H.H. HARRIS
ZELIG S. HARRIS
SIDNEY HOOK
FRED KARUSH
BRURIA KAUFMAN
IRMA L. LINDHEIM
NACHMAN MAISEL
SEYMOUR MELMAN
MYER D. MENDELSON
M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY
SAMUEL PITLICK
FRITZ ROHRLICH
LOUIS P. ROCKER
RUTH SAGIS
ITZHAK SANKOWSKY
I.J. SHOENBERG
SAMUEL SHUMAN
M. SINGER
IRMA WOLFE
STEFAN WOLF.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948

 

[kaz]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

The only thing Clinton wants from Jews in their vote. She's head of the Jew hating Democrat party. Don't get your undies in a bundle, they are with you

I agree with your first two lines, but Jew-hating Democrat party?

Both parties always swear total fealty to Israel, if that counts as loving Jews. And they want Jewish money, certainly (and for saying he didn't need it, the Jerusalem Post listed as one of three reasons "no Jew in good conscience could vote for Donald Trump").

Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama

Here is the WikiLeaks-provided discussion within the Clinton campaign of the Politico story linked above (re-ordered chronologically):

On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Oren Shur <[email protected]> wrote: This article seems to make the case for the Mook approach - clear, direct and principled.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: I was just thinking: has she made a clear statement on Israel yet? I get this question from donors all the time. Does she need to state her principles on Israel before Iran? Or do both at the same time?

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]> wrote: That's basically the goal of the BDS letter.

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: Do we need to push it harder over the next few days? Get something written? I feel like we're going to want something to point to. Or maybe even just content on the website?

On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Christina Reynolds < [email protected]> wrote: We could either get a donor to leak it or just give it to a reporter if we want to get it out there. I'm semi-surprised it's not out yet.

*From:* Jake Sullivan [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Friday, July 3, 2015 2:44 PM *To:* Christina Reynolds *Cc:* Robby Mook; Dan Schwerin; Oren Shur; John Podesta; Nick Merrill *Subject:* Re: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO We have a two pager I'm getting clearance from her on. That is what we have to ship around.

On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Christina Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: Right, but if we wanted to have a reporter cover the Israel support now, a leak of the letter could probably get written. Otherwise, we can work around the Israel support for reporters covering Iran.

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-07-03 17:07 Subject: Re: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO

Let's def give it to someone. I see zero downside to a story. Then we can circulate around right away (hopefully) in advance of Iran

Sure, Democrats say that, but then they turn around and blame Israel for every conflict. When Israel targets terrorists, they say that's the same as Palestinians shooting weapons into Israeli neighborhoods. And they blame Israel's existence for the conflicts. Jew hating is the one prejudice that is internationally still considered just fine. I don't get it. You need to pay more attention to what Democrats say about Israel

 

[LaDexter]

blame Israel for every conflict

... which is a truth you HATE and toss cards at all day here.

 

[kaz]

blame Israel for every conflict

... which is a truth you HATE and toss cards at all day here.

Yes, the bastards, going around being victims of terrorist Muslims, what are they thinking?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump: I'm Israel's best friend

 

[Little-Acorn]

First of all, the term is Zionist. Hillary has the support of all Zionist Jews. The sensible Jews like Jill Stein see right through her.

All little dexter sees in any issue is JEW JEW JEW.

A number of people in Europe in the 1930s and 40s were that way too.

We tried to negotiate them away from it for many years. Finally had to kill quite a few of them to get them to stop acting out their hatred. It was called "World War 2".

Looks like we missed a few.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

'A vote for Hillary is a vote to send your kids and grandkids to war "to help Israel"'

This idiocy of this, of course, is that it was the last Republican president that started a failed, illegal war.

Republicans are in no position to accuse others of being ‘warmongers.’

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

She has promised Netanyahu a US war with Iran. If elected, she will deliver, most likely by allowing the Mossad to stage yet another fraudulent 911 style terror attack, this time to be blamed on iran.

You cannot be pro Hillary and anti-war.

They are two things 180 degrees apart.

The hook nose Jew relishes in delight of this news.

 

[LaDexter]

it was the last Republican president that started a failed, illegal war.

... and all of the core supporters of W's treason are "with her..."

And a ton of Democrats were with W and "her"

Feinstein
Schumer
Waxman
Lieberman
Ed Koch
the "US" media

 

[LaDexter]

Let's have a refresher course on the US relationship with Israel

Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK, then Jacob Rubenstein shot Oswald.
That put LBJ in the White House, where the Vietnam war was escalated... to keep our defense factories running full blast... to arm ISRAEL.

LBJ and the "US media" told the American people that Israel was attacked in 1967. That was a lie...

CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency

"The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"

With LBJ's eager approval, Israel started the 67 war with US weapons given to them for free by LBJ (Vietnam was just smoke for LBJ, the re-conquest of the Promised Land was the motive for JFK's assassination by Jew Oswald (and others)).

then Israel refused to move off the land they took. Reports started of Zionist extermination of the residents of the Strip the Bank and the Heights. In response, the Navy sent the USS Liberty to investigate. The Israelis didn't like that, so they took planes given to them by the US and deliberately murdered the USS Liberty because fascist Zionists were exterminating the residence... with US weapons...

The USS Liberty Cover-Up


In 1982, Israel wanted the US to take out Hezbollah. So, instead of fighting that war themselves, they tried to bait us to do it for them by slaughtering 250 US Marines in Lebanon and blaming it, initially on Hezbo, then on the ficticious "Islamic Jihad," which was not heard from again until episode 17 of the "24" show...

Then, with Traitor W in office, Jew CIA-Mossad Tom Osman (OBL) ready to claim responsibility, Israel did 911 with W's full approval...

Google


So, our relation with that which Einstein warned us about, is that we GIVE GIVE GIVE money and weapons to Israel, and in exchange we are murdered, lied to, and baited into wars we have no national interest in fighting.

If you want that to continue, vote for Hillary, because that's who will continue it...

 

[francoHFW]

Unfortunately, permanent war is the "new" paradigm regardless of who you vote for, it is utterly bipartisan. It's just good for business and we are after all the arms dealer to the world.

So which party wants to rebuild our bloated military- and lied to get us into the longest stupidest war EVER? BS.

 

[francoHFW]

it was the last Republican president that started a failed, illegal war.

... and all of the core supporters of W's treason are "with her..."

And a ton of Democrats were with W and "her"

Feinstein
Schumer
Waxman
Lieberman
Ed Koch
the "US" media

All based on Booooshie BS, and they voted to give Boooosh LEVERAGE to avoid war. The GOP is the problem, dupe. duh.