Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to this, he was charged:
The DA would be the one who filed the charges....So yes.Were the charges actually filed in court?
Again, persons out on bail for violent crimes have all sorts of bond conditions set up to where they cannot possess firearms, restraining orders to where they can't be around other people, etc...It appears the case evaporated leaving no basis to steal this person's property.
5 corpses in Colorado would probably disagree.It should be extremely difficult for the government to seize private property. Making it easier is stupid beyond belief.
Did they? I've not seen anything official, nor has any media outlet reported court filings. No charges, no bail conditions, no cause to steal property.The DA would be the one who filed the charges....So yes.
Again, persons out on bail for violent crimes have all sorts of bond conditions set up to where they cannot possess firearms, restraining orders to where they can't be around other people, etc...
5 corpses in Colorado would probably disagree.
So if there were charges, you'd agree that he shouldn't have been able to buy a gun? Charges...not a conviction?Did they? I've not seen anything official, nor has any media outlet reported court filings. No charges, no bail conditions, no cause to steal property.
If it was part of his bail conditions and he had legal council to oversee there was no impropriety. There simply does not appear to be filed charges, hence no cause to violate his rights. You have a right to bail and reasonable restrictions, then a trial. You folks want to seize property without charges based on hearsay and rumors with no due process in accordance with the Constitution. No thanks.So if there were charges, you'd agree that he shouldn't have been able to buy a gun? Charges...not a conviction?
He's on tape saying he was going to blow up his house if the officers tried to come inside. You're calling that "hearsay and rumors"?If it was part of his bail conditions and he had legal council to oversee there was no impropriety. There simply does not appear to be filed charges, hence no cause to violate his rights. You have a right to bail and reasonable restrictions, then a trial. You folks want to seize property without charges based on hearsay and rumors with no due process in accordance with the Constitution. No thanks.
If it was part of his bail conditions and he had legal council to oversee there was no impropriety. There simply does not appear to be filed charges, hence no cause to violate his rights. You have a right to bail and reasonable restrictions, then a trial. You folks want to seize property without charges based on hearsay and rumors with no due process in accordance with the Constitution. No thanks.
No, I'm talking about your unconstitutional red flag laws. You need to take up your concerns with the local authorities.He's on tape saying he was going to blow up his house if the officers tried to come inside. You're calling that "hearsay and rumors"?
Booked on charges and having charges filed in court are two separate things.
So, we should just throw out innocent until proven guilty then?He was arrested.
He was arrested for allegedly having committed a violent crime....and whatdoyouknow...he committed another violent crime 18 months later.
So, that’s a yes? Why do you hate the constitution?We should probably keep people who threaten to blow someone up from acquiring firearms...
Incredibly sad, totally unbelievable reasoning. Dude clearly should not be allowed to have a firearm.
Seems to me if they are threatening blowing people up they should not be walking around free, unless they live in the Middle East where that sort of thing is PC.We should probably keep people who threaten to blow someone up from acquiring firearms...
Well, his mom dropped the charges. And apparently that sealed his arrest for multiple felonies.Seems to me if they are threatening blowing people up they should not be walking around free, unless they live in the Middle East where that sort of thing is PC.
Why is it every gun tragedy ends up with people like you pushing for tougher gun legislation, then when the legislation passes, you wait for the next tragedy to push for tougher gun legislation, then when it passes, you pass for tougher gun legislation.So you're okay with folks who are out on bail for murder pending trial having guns?
Why do you hate humanity?
Is that the case here?So you're okay with folks who are out on bail for murder pending trial having guns?
Why do you hate humanity?