ACTUALLY, Rice says intel still says the same thing, Pubs and Fox still WRONG...

[1776]

Shitstain, she is a lying bitch with no legit National Security experience.

She only has her job because she is some mixed breed liberal shitbag woman.

She's the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, NIMRODS LOL...AND WE still DON'T know IT'S GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM...SO WHAT DOES YOUR BS MATTER...

 

[francoHFW]

Qed, subhuman . Lol

 

[tinydancer]

She's the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, NIMRODS LOL...AND WE still DON'T know IT'S GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM...SO WHAT DOES YOUR BS MATTER...As Hilllary would say, and DID.

Let's see we have the Secretary of Defense stating it was a terrorist attack. We have General Ham calling it a terrorist attack.

Oh and the former head of the CIA testified to:

November 16 -- Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified on Capitol Hill

Petreaus said that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was an act of terrorism committed by al Qaeda-linked militants.

Now you wouldn't want to call Hillary Clinton a liar would you? Mrs. Clinton said quite bluntly that they were hunting down "terrorists". Not demonstrators.

January 23 --- Hillary Clinton

"We continue to hunt the terrorists responsible for the attacks in Benghazi and are determined to bring them to justice."

"There's evidence that the attacks were deliberate, opportunistic and pre-coordinated but not necessarily indicative of extensive planning."

What the Obama administration has said about the Libya attack - CNN.com

 

[Kosh]

The far left will do anything to protect their king and his court.

 

[GWV5903]

"On the night of September 11, 2012"

There is nothing that ties this to TERRORIST, NOTHING!!!

The fact that it happened 11 years to the date after 9/11 is pure coincidence, no link can be found, none, zero, never going to get this SMFNPOTUS to admit that, oh no, never...

 

[francoHFW]

Correct. It was probably the video that triggered the anti-American militia. TD- YOU SAID PANETTA SAID IT WAS AN ACT OF TERROR, THEN YOU SAY HE SAID TERRORISTS- LINK.

Al-Qaeda linked militants are still militants. These guys are FOS. ANYONE WITH A BRAIN GOES WITH THE national security advisor. Certainly NOT the Pub Proganda Machine- it's a tissue of BULLSHYTTE.

 

[francoHFW]

In the end, it's all an incredible mess, no lies, no conspiracy, such an unknown, what does it matter at this point...duh

 

[francoHFW]

Where the hell did ham get his info anyway- it's ridiculous...

 

[tinydancer]

Correct. It was probably the video that triggered the anti-American militia. TD- YOU SAID PANETTA SAID IT WAS AN ACT OF TERROR, THEN YOU SAY HE SAID TERRORISTS- LINK.

Al-Qaeda linked militants are still militants. These guys are FOS. ANYONE WITH A BRAIN GOES WITH THE national security advisor. Certainly NOT the Pub Proganda Machine- it's a tissue of BULLSHYTTE.

No I said in that post that he called it a "terror attack". Words have meaning.

Here's the exact quote:

"There was no question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack," Panetta said of his early assessment of the situation on the ground in Benghazi.


Pentagon labeled Benghazi a terrorist attack as Obama administration wavered: newly declassified testimony - NY Daily News

 

[tinydancer]

And why would I go with Susan Rice just because she's the National Security Adviser now?

She lied her ass off on all those Sunday talk shows when she was the US Ambassador to the United Nations. Rice was fed her talking points and ran with them. This was no spontaneous event due to a video.

So right from the get go her credibility is shot all to pieces.

Secretary of Defense Panetta, General Ham, General Patreaus former head of the CIA and every one else and their mothers were testifying that this was a terrorist attack.

 

[tinydancer]

Where the hell did ham get his info anyway- it's ridiculous...

Geeze louise. He was the United States Africa Commander who was the "go to guy" in all of this.

And Susan Rice was the Ambassador to the United Nations. She wasn't even in the loop. And frankly it was crazy to send her on all the talk shows to be a puppet.

Ham, whose partially redacted transcript was declassified by the House on Monday, said at the 2013 hearing that he was alerted to the incident 15 minutes after it erupted at 9:42 p.m. Libya Time (3:42 p.m. EST) on Sep. 11, 2012.

"When we saw a rocket-propelled grenade attack, what appeared to be pretty well aimed small arms fire — again, this is all coming second and third hand through unclassified, you know, commercial cellphones for the most part initially. To me, it started to become clear pretty quickly that this was certainly a terrorist attack and not just not something sporadic," he stated.

Ham served as head of the United States Africa Command, which manages U.S. military operations in Africa. He served in that capacity from March 2011 to April 2013.

He describes how as soon as AFRICOM learned of the attack, the command control repositioned a drone to the consulate to gather intelligence on the ground movements. The unmanned, unarmed surveillance aircraft was ordered to be diverted to the Benghazi site at 9:59 p.m. Libya Time, 17 minutes after the attack.


Pentagon labeled Benghazi a terrorist attack as Obama administration wavered: newly declassified testimony - NY Daily News

 

[francoHFW]

So, how many boots did the US Army have on the ground lol...where did he get THAT IDEA from, fools...

Rice had the intel back when, AND NOW. All your Ham and Panetta etc he said she said, terror/terrorist are interchangeable is pure Foxcrappe....

 

[francoHFW]

Not the gd drone bs AGAIN LOL...

SO HAM WAS PSYCHIC LOL...he heard the first report and just KNEW LOL...AND THAT'S how we know our best intel was a LIE lol...

 

[ScienceRocks]

I won't be silenced

 

[GISMYS]

so, how many boots did the us army have on the ground lol...where did he get that idea from, fools...

Rice had the intel back when, and now. All your ham and panetta etc he said she said, terror/terrorist are interchangeable is pure foxcrappe....

i saw my little brother get spankings for telling lies so i told him if you are going to lie then stick to your story. Later mon told us ,:don't eat those plums they may have worms" but we ate them and mom asked ,did you boys eat those plums? I said yes i did but my little brother said no!! Honest positive no with plum skins on his front teeth. Wow did he get another spanking!!!

 

[tinydancer]

So, how many boots did the US Army have on the ground lol...where did he get THAT IDEA from, fools...

Rice had the intel back when, AND NOW. All your Ham and Panetta etc he said she said, terror/terrorist are interchangeable is pure Foxcrappe....

Susan Rice wasn't even in the loop that night. Rice was a UN Ambassador. Nothing more. Throwing her on the Sunday talk show circuit with bullshit talking points was really nuts.

Ham is a General who testified. Panetta was Sec. of Defense. Dempsey was the other General that was in the thick of this as well.

These three key players briefed the President.

This is all on record. Just new declassified testimony has become available now. Rice was not there. Nor should she have been.

For crying out loud there is no dispute on how this all unfolded that fateful night. That particular timeline has never been in question.

Rice was a non player. Wasn't there as all of this was going down.

Ham's account of that fateful day was included in some 450 pages of testimony given by senior Pentagon officials in classified, closed-door hearings conducted last year by the Armed Services subcommittee.

The testimony, given under "Top Secret" clearance and only declassified this month, presents a rare glimpse into how information during a crisis travels at the top echelons of America's national security apparatus, all the way up to the president.

Also among those whose secret testimony was declassified was Dempsey, the first person Ham briefed about Benghazi.

Ham told lawmakers he considered it a fortuitous "happenstance" that he was able to rope Dempsey and Panetta into one meeting, so that, as Ham put it, "they had the basic information as they headed across for the meeting at the White House."

Ham also told lawmakers he met with Panetta and Dempsey when they returned from their 30-minute session with President Obama on Sept. 11.

Blog: Administration knew within minutes that Benghazi attack was terrorism

 

[francoHFW]

You Foxbots actually think the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR is making up intel- you're right off the wall lol...

 

[francoHFW]

Rice is NOW the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR AND SAID THIS 3 DAYS AGO- she was briefed by EVERYONE before the sunday talk shows and guess what, OUR BEST INTEL HASN'T CHANGED- despite a tidal wave of stupid irrelevant Pubcrappe. Jeebus you're functional tinfoil MORONS....WHERE THE FUCK DO THINK HAM WAS LOL...ay caramba..

 

[francoHFW]

breaking- Rice said this 3 days ago, same GD thing- and what Ham said on first reception of radio call is called ''fog of war'' and ''first conjecture''. Fox just cherry picks anything that agrees with their BS PROPAGANDA And repeats it endlessly, out of context and oblivious......And good night, Frau TD...

 

[tinydancer]

Not the gd drone bs AGAIN LOL...

SO HAM WAS PSYCHIC LOL...he heard the first report and just KNEW LOL...AND THAT'S how we know our best intel was a LIE lol...

What are you talking about? A drone was deployed immediately. He was getting reports coming in from the command center.

It wasn't a protest. It wasn't a demonstration. This was a terrorist attack. Plain and simple.

Panetta and other high ranking officials all believed it was a terrorist attack as they have testified.

This isn't "he said she said". Susan Rice was not part of this.

Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee in February of last year that it was him who informed the president that "there was an apparent attack going on in Benghazi." "Secretary Panetta, do you believe that unequivocally at that time we knew that this was a terrorist attack?" asked Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.

"There was no question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack," Panetta replied.

Senior State Department officials who were in direct, real-time contact with the Americans under assault in Benghazi have also made clear they, too, knew immediately -- from surveillance video and eyewitness accounts -- that the incident was a terrorist attack.

After providing the first substantive "tick-tock" of the events in Benghazi, during a background briefing conducted on the evening of Oct. 9, 2012, a reporter asked two top aides to then-Secretary Clinton: "What in all of these events that you've described led officials to believe for the first several days that this was prompted by protests against the video?"

"That is a question that you would have to ask others," replied one of the senior officials. "That was not our conclusion."


Blog: Administration knew within minutes that Benghazi attack was terrorism