jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,560
- 29,291
- 2,180
Mr. Socks, it's funny, and yet you and yours can't produce one reason for the manipulation of datasets. Why?Mr. jc, you know nothing at all concerning science. It is evidenced in all your posting. However, you people do have a real problem. You see, reality is kicking your teeth in.dude, I don't. I take my daily beating in here because I know more than the experts. You know, those money hungry scientists who know nothing about what science actually is?hey Frank, I concluded after several discussions lately about the CO2 in the oceans, the manipulation likely occurring is the adding of heat due to back radiation temperatures. In one of the posts over the weekend, one of the lefties stated something about using a spectrometer and reading back radiation. Seems logical since that is there biggest belief is that added back radiation is heating the water right?So interesting in the study of human minds is it that 'belief' in a scientific phenomena is ALSO an issue that happens down partisan lines.
Oh what a coinkidink
Yeah, they can't show us in a lab how 120PPM of additional can warm air, now they have a bigger problem because they're claiming that the CO2, that can't warm air, is warming a far greater volume of water that takes far more energy to warm!
You just have to have faith that the data manipulators are telling us the truth
Who cares what they say, seriously. If their experts can't get it right (read my last post) why should we believe that these armchair experts have a clue!
2014 right up there with 1998, 2005, and 2010. Now 2015 looking to establish a new bar for heat. And you people just keep yapping about a cooling. Your continued denial of the present El Nino is a wonderful example of the idiocy of your positions. And your lack integrity in your denial of reality.